Task shifting from general practitioners to other health professionals in out-of-hours primary care - a systematic literature review on content and quality of task shifting.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2024.2351807
Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt, Mette Amalie Nebsbjerg, Viola Burau, Anna Mygind, Morten Bondo Christensen, Linda Huibers
{"title":"Task shifting from general practitioners to other health professionals in out-of-hours primary care - a systematic literature review on content and quality of task shifting.","authors":"Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt, Mette Amalie Nebsbjerg, Viola Burau, Anna Mygind, Morten Bondo Christensen, Linda Huibers","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2024.2351807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Task shifting from general practitioners (GPs) to other health professionals could solve the increased workload, but an overview of the evidence is lacking for out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the content and quality of task shifting from GPs to other health professionals in clinic consultations and home visits in OOH-PC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four database literature searches were performed on 13 December 2021, and updated in August 2023. We included articles that studied content (patient characteristics, reason for encounter) and/or quality (patient satisfaction, safety, efficiency) of task shifting in face-to-face contacts at OOH-PC. Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion and assessed the methodological quality of included articles using the JBI critical appraisal checklist. Data was extracted and results were synthesised in a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1,829 articles, resulting in the final inclusion of seven articles conducted in the UK or the Netherlands. Studies compared GPs with other health professionals (mainly nurses). These other health professionals saw patients with less urgent health problems, younger patients, and patients with less complex health problems than GPs. Most studies concluded that other health professionals provided safe and vastly efficient care corresponding to the level of GPs but findings about productivity were inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of safety and efficiency of care provided by other health professionals in OOH-PC seems like that of GPs, although they mainly see patients presenting with less urgent and less complex health problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"30 1","pages":"2351807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11123461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2351807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Task shifting from general practitioners (GPs) to other health professionals could solve the increased workload, but an overview of the evidence is lacking for out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC).

Objectives: To evaluate the content and quality of task shifting from GPs to other health professionals in clinic consultations and home visits in OOH-PC.

Methods: Four database literature searches were performed on 13 December 2021, and updated in August 2023. We included articles that studied content (patient characteristics, reason for encounter) and/or quality (patient satisfaction, safety, efficiency) of task shifting in face-to-face contacts at OOH-PC. Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion and assessed the methodological quality of included articles using the JBI critical appraisal checklist. Data was extracted and results were synthesised in a narrative summary.

Results: The search identified 1,829 articles, resulting in the final inclusion of seven articles conducted in the UK or the Netherlands. Studies compared GPs with other health professionals (mainly nurses). These other health professionals saw patients with less urgent health problems, younger patients, and patients with less complex health problems than GPs. Most studies concluded that other health professionals provided safe and vastly efficient care corresponding to the level of GPs but findings about productivity were inconclusive.

Conclusion: The level of safety and efficiency of care provided by other health professionals in OOH-PC seems like that of GPs, although they mainly see patients presenting with less urgent and less complex health problems.

全科医生在非工作时间基层医疗服务中向其他医疗专业人员的任务转移--关于任务转移的内容和质量的系统文献综述。
背景:将任务从全科医生(GP)转移到其他医疗专业人员身上可以解决工作量增加的问题,但对于非工作时间的初级保健(OOH-PC)却缺乏相关证据:全科医生(GPs)向其他医疗专业人员的任务转移可以解决工作量增加的问题,但缺乏对非工作时间初级医疗(OOH-PC)证据的概述:目的:评估在非工作时间初级保健的门诊咨询和家访中由全科医生向其他医疗专业人员进行任务转移的内容和质量:于 2021 年 12 月 13 日进行了四次数据库文献检索,并于 2023 年 8 月进行了更新。我们收录了对其他医疗机构面对面接触中任务转移的内容(患者特征、接触原因)和/或质量(患者满意度、安全性、效率)进行研究的文章。两位作者独立筛选纳入文章,并使用 JBI 临界评估清单评估纳入文章的方法学质量。对数据进行提取,并在叙述性摘要中对结果进行综合:检索共发现 1,829 篇文章,最终纳入了 7 篇在英国或荷兰进行的文章。研究将全科医生与其他医疗专业人员(主要是护士)进行了比较。与全科医生相比,这些其他医疗专业人员所诊治的患者健康问题不那么紧急、患者年龄更小、患者健康问题不那么复杂。大多数研究得出结论,其他医疗专业人员提供的医疗服务安全高效,与全科医生的水平相当,但关于工作效率的研究结果尚无定论:结论:其他医疗专业人员在门诊-急诊室提供的医疗服务的安全和效率水平似乎与全科医生相当,尽管他们主要接诊的是病情不太紧急和不太复杂的病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信