Influence of residues from bioceramic sealer on the bond interface with universal adhesive in different application modes

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Joatan Lucas de Sousa Gomes Costa, Antonia Patricia Oliveira Barros, Adirson Jorge Junior, Mariana Bena Gelio, Andréa Abi Rached Dantas, Milton Carlos Kuga
{"title":"Influence of residues from bioceramic sealer on the bond interface with universal adhesive in different application modes","authors":"Joatan Lucas de Sousa Gomes Costa,&nbsp;Antonia Patricia Oliveira Barros,&nbsp;Adirson Jorge Junior,&nbsp;Mariana Bena Gelio,&nbsp;Andréa Abi Rached Dantas,&nbsp;Milton Carlos Kuga","doi":"10.1111/eos.12994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated the effect on adhesive layer thickness, bond strength, and adhesive failure pattern of the application of universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal) using either manual or rotary brush in dentin previously impregnated with bioceramic sealer (Sealer Plus BC) using a manual brush, at 24 h and 1 year. Eighty-eight bovine crowns were divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 22) according to the intervention: (i) use of bioceramic sealer and adhesive application using manual brush, (ii) use of bioceramic sealer and adhesive application using rotary brush, (iii) use of resin sealer and adhesive application using manual brush, and (iv) use of resin sealer and adhesive application using rotary brush. Subsequently, specimens were restored with a composite resin (Filtek Z-250). Adhesive layer thickness was evaluated using confocal microscopy. Bond strength was assessed using the microtensile bond strength test, and adhesive failure pattern was evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA/Tukey tests. Specimens where a rotary brush had been used exhibited lower adhesive layer thickness. Specimens treated with resin sealer and using a manual brush showed lower bond strength values and a higher occurrence of adhesive failures at 24 h and 1 year than specimens treated with bioceramic sealer and using rotary brush for adhesive application.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"132 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.12994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect on adhesive layer thickness, bond strength, and adhesive failure pattern of the application of universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal) using either manual or rotary brush in dentin previously impregnated with bioceramic sealer (Sealer Plus BC) using a manual brush, at 24 h and 1 year. Eighty-eight bovine crowns were divided into four groups (n = 22) according to the intervention: (i) use of bioceramic sealer and adhesive application using manual brush, (ii) use of bioceramic sealer and adhesive application using rotary brush, (iii) use of resin sealer and adhesive application using manual brush, and (iv) use of resin sealer and adhesive application using rotary brush. Subsequently, specimens were restored with a composite resin (Filtek Z-250). Adhesive layer thickness was evaluated using confocal microscopy. Bond strength was assessed using the microtensile bond strength test, and adhesive failure pattern was evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA/Tukey tests. Specimens where a rotary brush had been used exhibited lower adhesive layer thickness. Specimens treated with resin sealer and using a manual brush showed lower bond strength values and a higher occurrence of adhesive failures at 24 h and 1 year than specimens treated with bioceramic sealer and using rotary brush for adhesive application.

不同应用模式下生物陶瓷密封剂残留物对通用粘合剂粘接界面的影响。
本研究评估了使用手动刷或旋转刷在浸渍了生物陶瓷封闭剂(Sealer Plus BC)的牙本质上涂抹通用粘合剂(思高邦通用粘合剂)在24小时和1年后对粘合层厚度、粘接强度和粘接失败模式的影响。88 个牛冠按照干预方法分为四组(n = 22):(i) 使用手动刷涂抹生物陶瓷封闭剂和粘合剂;(ii) 使用旋转刷涂抹生物陶瓷封闭剂和粘合剂;(iii) 使用手动刷涂抹树脂封闭剂和粘合剂;(iv) 使用旋转刷涂抹树脂封闭剂和粘合剂。随后,用复合树脂(Filtek Z-250)对试样进行修复。使用共聚焦显微镜评估粘合剂层厚度。粘接强度采用显微拉伸粘接强度测试进行评估,粘接失效模式在体视显微镜下进行评估。数据采用双向方差分析/Tukey 检验进行分析。使用旋转刷的试样粘合层厚度较低。与使用生物陶瓷密封剂和旋转刷涂抹粘合剂的试样相比,使用树脂密封剂和手动刷处理的试样在 24 小时和 1 年后的粘合强度值较低,粘合失效的发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信