Effectiveness of Postburn Pruritus Treatment and Improvement of Insomnia-A Randomized Trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Elliott Arko-Boham, Albert Bedford Paintsil, Benjamin Arko-Boham, George Obeng Adjei
{"title":"Effectiveness of Postburn Pruritus Treatment and Improvement of Insomnia-A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Elliott Arko-Boham, Albert Bedford Paintsil, Benjamin Arko-Boham, George Obeng Adjei","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postburn pruritus is difficult to assess and treat. Antihistamines used in its treatment provide little relief. Identification of the itch neuronal pathway has inspired new alternatives, including gabapentin, for its management. The study compared the effectiveness of cetirizine, gabapentin, and a combination of gabapentin and cetirizine in treating postburn pruritus. Burn patients were randomly assigned to treatment with Cetirizine (n = 23), Gabapentin (n = 23), or Cetirizine plus Gabapentin (n = 23). A baseline assessment of the intensity or the severity of pruritus was evaluated, after which treatment commenced with standard doses of the 3 study regimens. Quality of sleep was assessed at baseline (day 0) and repeated on day 3, day 7, and day 14. Approximately 97% of participants presented with moderate or severe itch; 69% with acute itch; and the majority (94.2%) experienced pruritus between the first and fourth weeks. Gabapentin reduced itch by 92.9% in 14 days compared to cetirizine's 61.8%. The combined effect of cetirizine and gabapentin was comparable using gabapentin alone. When the itch became protracted over 6 weeks, the effectiveness of cetirizine in controlling itch worsened. It reduced itch intensity by only 37.7%, whilst gabapentin did so at 89.4%. Itch intensity correlated positively with insomnia, and controlling itch intensity improved sleep. Gabapentin was more effective for the treatment of postburn pruritus than cetirizine. Controlling itch intensity improved sleep. In acute and moderate itch, low-dose gabapentin could be added if cetirizine is the drug intended for its treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1165-1174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postburn pruritus is difficult to assess and treat. Antihistamines used in its treatment provide little relief. Identification of the itch neuronal pathway has inspired new alternatives, including gabapentin, for its management. The study compared the effectiveness of cetirizine, gabapentin, and a combination of gabapentin and cetirizine in treating postburn pruritus. Burn patients were randomly assigned to treatment with Cetirizine (n = 23), Gabapentin (n = 23), or Cetirizine plus Gabapentin (n = 23). A baseline assessment of the intensity or the severity of pruritus was evaluated, after which treatment commenced with standard doses of the 3 study regimens. Quality of sleep was assessed at baseline (day 0) and repeated on day 3, day 7, and day 14. Approximately 97% of participants presented with moderate or severe itch; 69% with acute itch; and the majority (94.2%) experienced pruritus between the first and fourth weeks. Gabapentin reduced itch by 92.9% in 14 days compared to cetirizine's 61.8%. The combined effect of cetirizine and gabapentin was comparable using gabapentin alone. When the itch became protracted over 6 weeks, the effectiveness of cetirizine in controlling itch worsened. It reduced itch intensity by only 37.7%, whilst gabapentin did so at 89.4%. Itch intensity correlated positively with insomnia, and controlling itch intensity improved sleep. Gabapentin was more effective for the treatment of postburn pruritus than cetirizine. Controlling itch intensity improved sleep. In acute and moderate itch, low-dose gabapentin could be added if cetirizine is the drug intended for its treatment.

烧伤后瘙痒症治疗和改善失眠的效果--随机试验。
烧伤后瘙痒症很难评估和治疗。用于治疗的抗组胺药几乎没有缓解作用。痒神经元通路的确定激发了包括加巴喷丁在内的新替代治疗方法。这项研究比较了西替利嗪、加巴喷丁以及加巴喷丁和西替利嗪组合治疗烧伤后瘙痒症的效果。烧伤患者被随机分配接受西替利嗪(23 人)、加巴喷丁(23 人)或西替利嗪加加巴喷丁(23 人)治疗。对瘙痒强度或严重程度进行基线评估后,开始使用标准剂量的三种研究方案进行治疗。睡眠质量在基线(第 0 天)进行评估,并在第 3 天、第 7 天和第 14 天重复评估。约 97% 的参与者出现中度或重度瘙痒;69% 的参与者出现急性瘙痒;大多数参与者(94.2%)在第一周至第四周出现瘙痒。加巴喷丁在 14 天内的止痒率为 92.9%,而西替利嗪的止痒率为 61.8%。西替利嗪和加巴喷丁的综合效果与单独使用加巴喷丁的效果相当。如果瘙痒持续 6 周以上,西替利嗪的止痒效果就会下降。西替利嗪的止痒效果仅为 37.7%,而加巴喷丁的止痒效果为 89.4%。瘙痒强度与失眠呈正相关,控制瘙痒强度可改善睡眠。加巴喷丁治疗烧伤后瘙痒比西替利嗪更有效。控制瘙痒强度可改善睡眠。对于急性和中度瘙痒,如果西替利嗪是治疗瘙痒的首选药物,则可加用小剂量加巴喷丁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信