Steroid responsiveness predicts olfactory function recovery in dupilumab treated CRSwNP.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin23.452
J J Otten, R J L van der Lans, L B Benoist, G F J P M Adriaensen, R D Hoven, V Verkest, W J Fokkens, S Reitsma
{"title":"Steroid responsiveness predicts olfactory function recovery in dupilumab treated CRSwNP.","authors":"J J Otten, R J L van der Lans, L B Benoist, G F J P M Adriaensen, R D Hoven, V Verkest, W J Fokkens, S Reitsma","doi":"10.4193/Rhin23.452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no known predictor for olfactory function recovery with dupilumab treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This study assessed whether patient-reported recovery of olfactory function on oral corticosteroids (OCS) is a prognostic factor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of pre-biological OCS-responsiveness on olfactory functioning (OCS-responsive or OCS-unresponsive; OCS-r and OCR-u, respectively) as predictor for olfactory functioning after 6 months of dupilumab therapy for severe CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>212 CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab were divided between OCS-r (reported improvement of olfactory function with OCS before dupilumab treatment, n = 152), and OCS-u (OCS-unresponsive; no such improvement, n = 60). Olfactory function was tested with Sniffin's Sticks Identification Test (12 pens; SSIT-12). At baseline, both groups had a median SSIT-12 score of 3 / 12 indicating anosmia. Hyposmia and normosmia rates were also comparable (5.9% and 3.3% in OCS-r, respectively; 5.0% and 1.7% in OCS-u, respectively). After 6 months of dupilumab treatment, OCS-r showed higher olfactory scores (median SSIT-12: 8/12; 52.6% hyposmia and 17.8% normosmia) than OCS-u (median SSIT-12: 5/12; 31.7% hyposmia and 3.3% normosmia). The positive predictive value of OCS-responsiveness on scoring <7 (normosmia/hyposmia) on the SSIT-12 after 6 months of dupilumab treatment was 70.4%. Conversely, the negative predictive value of OCS-unresponsiveness on scoring <7 (anosmia) on the SSIT-12 after 6 months of dupilumab treatment was 65.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who report olfactory function improvement on OCS have a higher chance of recovery of olfactory function during the first six months of treatment with dupilumab than patients who do not.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"403-409"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no known predictor for olfactory function recovery with dupilumab treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This study assessed whether patient-reported recovery of olfactory function on oral corticosteroids (OCS) is a prognostic factor.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of pre-biological OCS-responsiveness on olfactory functioning (OCS-responsive or OCS-unresponsive; OCS-r and OCR-u, respectively) as predictor for olfactory functioning after 6 months of dupilumab therapy for severe CRSwNP.

Results: 212 CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab were divided between OCS-r (reported improvement of olfactory function with OCS before dupilumab treatment, n = 152), and OCS-u (OCS-unresponsive; no such improvement, n = 60). Olfactory function was tested with Sniffin's Sticks Identification Test (12 pens; SSIT-12). At baseline, both groups had a median SSIT-12 score of 3 / 12 indicating anosmia. Hyposmia and normosmia rates were also comparable (5.9% and 3.3% in OCS-r, respectively; 5.0% and 1.7% in OCS-u, respectively). After 6 months of dupilumab treatment, OCS-r showed higher olfactory scores (median SSIT-12: 8/12; 52.6% hyposmia and 17.8% normosmia) than OCS-u (median SSIT-12: 5/12; 31.7% hyposmia and 3.3% normosmia). The positive predictive value of OCS-responsiveness on scoring <7 (normosmia/hyposmia) on the SSIT-12 after 6 months of dupilumab treatment was 70.4%. Conversely, the negative predictive value of OCS-unresponsiveness on scoring <7 (anosmia) on the SSIT-12 after 6 months of dupilumab treatment was 65.0%.

Conclusion: Patients who report olfactory function improvement on OCS have a higher chance of recovery of olfactory function during the first six months of treatment with dupilumab than patients who do not.

类固醇反应性可预测接受杜匹单抗治疗的 CRSwNP 患者的嗅觉功能恢复情况。
背景:目前尚无已知的预测因素可预测慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者接受杜必鲁单抗治疗后嗅觉功能的恢复情况。本研究评估了患者报告的口服皮质类固醇(OCS)嗅觉功能恢复情况是否是预后因素:方法:回顾性分析生物前 OCS 反应性对嗅觉功能的影响(分别为 OCS 反应性或 OCS 无反应性;OCS-r 和 OCR-u),以此预测重度 CRSwNP 患者接受 6 个月杜比鲁单抗治疗后的嗅觉功能。结果:212 名接受双鲁单抗治疗的 CRSwNP 患者被分为 OCS-r(据报告在接受双鲁单抗治疗前通过 OCS 改善了嗅觉功能,n = 152)和 OCS-u(OCS 无反应;无改善,n = 60)。嗅觉功能用嗅棒识别测试(12 支;SSIT-12)进行测试。基线时,两组的 SSIT-12 评分中位数均为 3/12 分,表明存在嗅觉缺失。低滲透率和正常滲透率也不相上下(OCS-r 組分別為 5.9% 和 3.3%;OCS-u 組分別為 5.0% 和 1.7%)。在接受 6 个月的杜普鲁单抗治疗后,OCS-r 的嗅觉评分(SSIT-12 中位数:8/12;52.6%嗅觉减退,17.8%嗅觉正常)高于 OCS-u(SSIT-12 中位数:5/12;31.7%嗅觉减退,3.3%嗅觉正常)。在杜匹单抗治疗 6 个月后,OCS 反应性在 SSIT-12 评分≥7 分(正常滲透/滲透不足)的阳性预测值为 70.4%。反之,OCS-无反应评分的阴性预测值为 70.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信