Calcium channel blockers and Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2024-05-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864241252713
Junyu Lin, Dejiang Pang, Chunyu Li, Ruwei Ou, Yujiao Yu, Yiyuan Cui, Jingxuan Huang, Huifang Shang
{"title":"Calcium channel blockers and Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Junyu Lin, Dejiang Pang, Chunyu Li, Ruwei Ou, Yujiao Yu, Yiyuan Cui, Jingxuan Huang, Huifang Shang","doi":"10.1177/17562864241252713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The calcium channel has been considered to have great potential as a drug target for neuroprotective therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD), but previous studies yielded inconsistent results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between using calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and the risk and progression of PD.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>The terms such as 'Parkinson's disease', 'PD', 'calcium channel blockers', and 'CCB' were used to search the literature published before 1 May 2023 in English databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for studies on CCB and PD. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 190 works of literature were preliminarily retrieved, and 177 works of literature were excluded by eliminating duplicates, reading abstracts, and reading full texts. A total of nine studies were finally included in the meta-analysis of the CCB and the risk of PD, and five studies were included in the systematic review of the CCB and the progression of PD. A total of 2,961,695 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The random-effects model was used for analysis due to significant heterogeneity. The main results of the meta-analysis showed that the use of CCB could reduce the risk of PD (relative risk 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCB use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of PD. Whether CCB use has a disease-modifying effect on PD needs further study.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42024508242.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11104025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241252713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The calcium channel has been considered to have great potential as a drug target for neuroprotective therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD), but previous studies yielded inconsistent results.

Objectives: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between using calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and the risk and progression of PD.

Data sources and methods: The terms such as 'Parkinson's disease', 'PD', 'calcium channel blockers', and 'CCB' were used to search the literature published before 1 May 2023 in English databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for studies on CCB and PD. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software.

Results: A total of 190 works of literature were preliminarily retrieved, and 177 works of literature were excluded by eliminating duplicates, reading abstracts, and reading full texts. A total of nine studies were finally included in the meta-analysis of the CCB and the risk of PD, and five studies were included in the systematic review of the CCB and the progression of PD. A total of 2,961,695 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The random-effects model was used for analysis due to significant heterogeneity. The main results of the meta-analysis showed that the use of CCB could reduce the risk of PD (relative risk 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.99).

Conclusion: CCB use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of PD. Whether CCB use has a disease-modifying effect on PD needs further study.

Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024508242.

钙通道阻滞剂与帕金森病:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:钙通道被认为是帕金森病(PD)神经保护疗法的一个极具潜力的药物靶点,但以往的研究结果并不一致:本研究旨在进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估使用钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)与帕金森病的风险和进展之间的关系:使用 "帕金森病"、"帕金森病"、"钙通道阻滞剂 "和 "CCB "等术语在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library等英文数据库中检索2023年5月1日前发表的有关CCB和帕金森病的研究文献。使用Review Manager 5.3软件进行数据分析:初步检索到190篇文献,通过剔除重复文献、阅读摘要和阅读全文,排除了177篇文献。最终共有9项研究被纳入CCB与帕金森病风险的荟萃分析,5项研究被纳入CCB与帕金森病进展的系统综述。共有2,961,695名参与者被纳入荟萃分析。由于存在显著的异质性,因此采用随机效应模型进行分析。荟萃分析的主要结果显示,使用CCB可降低PD的风险(相对风险为0.78,95%置信区间为0.62-0.99):结论:CCB的使用与PD风险的显著降低有关。结论:服用氯解磷定可明显降低帕金森氏症的风险,但服用氯解磷定是否对帕金森氏症有疾病调节作用还需进一步研究:PROCROPERO:CRD42024508242。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信