Nasal axis lateralization suture technique in crooked nose.

IF 1.9 3区医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08740-8

Ibrahim Erdim, Beyza Akcan

{"title":"Nasal axis lateralization suture technique in crooked nose.","authors":"Ibrahim Erdim, Beyza Akcan","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08740-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the present study was to objectively and subjectively compare the preoperative and postoperative aesthetic and functional outcomes of the correction of crooked noses using a suture technique we call \"nasal axis lateralization suture (NALS)\".Method: A total of 36 patients who had preoperative and postoperative photographs taken and who completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire were included in the study.Results: Crooked noses were divided into two groups: C-shaped (17 patients) and I-shaped (19 patients). The preoperative and postoperative nasal axis angles were 145.3 ± 11.9 and 178.5 ± 3.3, respectively, in C-shaped nasal deviation. In I-shaped nasal deviation, on the other hand, the preoperative nasal axis angle was 8.8 ± 2.8, while the postoperative nasal axis angle was 1.4 ± 2.4. In terms of the ideal axis percentage before and after surgery, a significant difference was found between the C-shaped and I-shaped nasal deviation patient groups (p < 0.05). While there was a significant improvement in both groups in the evaluation based on the ROE questionnaire, satisfaction was much higher in the C-shaped nasal deviation group. In both groups, the ROE values of functional and aesthetic outcomes were significantly different compared to the preoperative values of both groups (p < 0.005).Conclusion: NALS can be used as an alternative technique to correct both I-shaped and C-shaped nasal axis deviations.","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08740-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to objectively and subjectively compare the preoperative and postoperative aesthetic and functional outcomes of the correction of crooked noses using a suture technique we call "nasal axis lateralization suture (NALS)".

Method: A total of 36 patients who had preoperative and postoperative photographs taken and who completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire were included in the study.

Results: Crooked noses were divided into two groups: C-shaped (17 patients) and I-shaped (19 patients). The preoperative and postoperative nasal axis angles were 145.3 ± 11.9 and 178.5 ± 3.3, respectively, in C-shaped nasal deviation. In I-shaped nasal deviation, on the other hand, the preoperative nasal axis angle was 8.8 ± 2.8, while the postoperative nasal axis angle was 1.4 ± 2.4. In terms of the ideal axis percentage before and after surgery, a significant difference was found between the C-shaped and I-shaped nasal deviation patient groups (p < 0.05). While there was a significant improvement in both groups in the evaluation based on the ROE questionnaire, satisfaction was much higher in the C-shaped nasal deviation group. In both groups, the ROE values of functional and aesthetic outcomes were significantly different compared to the preoperative values of both groups (p < 0.005).

Conclusion: NALS can be used as an alternative technique to correct both I-shaped and C-shaped nasal axis deviations.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

歪鼻的鼻轴侧向缝合技术。

目的：本研究旨在客观和主观地比较使用我们称之为 "鼻轴侧向缝合（NALS）"的缝合技术矫正歪鼻的术前和术后美学和功能效果：方法：共对36名患者进行了术前和术后拍照，并填写了鼻整形术效果评估（ROE）问卷：歪鼻分为两组：结果：歪鼻分为两组：C 形（17 名患者）和 I 形（19 名患者）。C 型鼻偏斜患者的术前和术后鼻轴角分别为 145.3 ± 11.9 和 178.5 ± 3.3。而 I 型鼻偏斜患者的术前鼻轴角为 8.8 ± 2.8，术后鼻轴角为 1.4 ± 2.4。就手术前后的理想轴线百分比而言，C 型鼻偏曲患者组和 I 型鼻偏曲患者组之间存在显著差异（p 结论：NALS 可作为鼻偏曲治疗的一种替代方法：NALS 可作为矫正 I 型和 C 型鼻轴线偏差的替代技术。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

7.70%

发文量

537

审稿时长

2-4 weeks

期刊介绍： Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.