Impact of Privatization on Healthcare System: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tareq M Alayed, Assem S Alrumeh, Ibrahim A Alkanhal, Raghad T Alhuthil
{"title":"Impact of Privatization on Healthcare System: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Tareq M Alayed, Assem S Alrumeh, Ibrahim A Alkanhal, Raghad T Alhuthil","doi":"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_510_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A notable shift in healthcare policy is healthcare privatization, which refers to the transfer of ownership, management, or provision of healthcare services from the public sector to private entities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide a narrative examination of the impact of privatization on various dimensions of healthcare, including quality, equity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. Policymakers can utilize the findings of this study to make well-informed decisions regarding privatization strategies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review was implemented using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Studies conducted from January 2000 to January 2023 in developing or developed countries that assessed the impact of healthcare privatization on population health within public sector institutions were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies were included. The findings revealed diverse perspectives on the impact of healthcare privatization, with four studies (36.4%) supporting privatization (two of these were conducted in Saudi Arabia), six studies (54.5%) opposing it (three of these were conducted in European countries), and one study (9.1%) taking a neutral stance. Two studies investigated the impact on healthcare quality, and both revealed that privatization negatively impacts uninsured patients and low-income populations. In addition, five studies investigated the healthcare access and equity dimensions following privatization: one was in favor, one was neutral, and three were opposing it. Four studies investigated the cost-effectiveness dimension, with three in favor and one study opposing it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights different perspectives on healthcare privatization. While studies, as those from Saudi Arabia, suggest benefits in terms of efficiency and innovation, others, particularly from European countries, emphasize negative consequences such as inequity and reduced quality. This emphasizes the need for more investigations to understand privatization's impact on healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":21442,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_510_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A notable shift in healthcare policy is healthcare privatization, which refers to the transfer of ownership, management, or provision of healthcare services from the public sector to private entities.

Objectives: To provide a narrative examination of the impact of privatization on various dimensions of healthcare, including quality, equity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. Policymakers can utilize the findings of this study to make well-informed decisions regarding privatization strategies.

Materials and methods: A systematic review was implemented using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Studies conducted from January 2000 to January 2023 in developing or developed countries that assessed the impact of healthcare privatization on population health within public sector institutions were included.

Results: Eleven studies were included. The findings revealed diverse perspectives on the impact of healthcare privatization, with four studies (36.4%) supporting privatization (two of these were conducted in Saudi Arabia), six studies (54.5%) opposing it (three of these were conducted in European countries), and one study (9.1%) taking a neutral stance. Two studies investigated the impact on healthcare quality, and both revealed that privatization negatively impacts uninsured patients and low-income populations. In addition, five studies investigated the healthcare access and equity dimensions following privatization: one was in favor, one was neutral, and three were opposing it. Four studies investigated the cost-effectiveness dimension, with three in favor and one study opposing it.

Conclusion: This review highlights different perspectives on healthcare privatization. While studies, as those from Saudi Arabia, suggest benefits in terms of efficiency and innovation, others, particularly from European countries, emphasize negative consequences such as inequity and reduced quality. This emphasizes the need for more investigations to understand privatization's impact on healthcare.

私有化对医疗保健系统的影响:系统回顾
背景:医疗保健政策的一个显著转变是医疗保健私有化,它是指将医疗保健服务的所有权、管理权或提供权从公共部门转移给私营实体:叙述私有化对医疗保健各方面的影响,包括质量、公平性、可及性和成本效益。政策制定者可以利用本研究的结果,就私有化战略做出明智的决策:使用以下数据库进行了系统性综述:PubMed、Scopus 和 Google Scholar。结果:共纳入了 11 项研究:结果:共纳入 11 项研究。研究结果显示,人们对医疗私有化的影响持不同观点,其中 4 项研究(36.4%)支持私有化(其中 2 项研究在沙特阿拉伯进行),6 项研究(54.5%)反对私有化(其中 3 项研究在欧洲国家进行),1 项研究(9.1%)持中立立场。有两项研究调查了私有化对医疗质量的影响,这两项研究都表明私有化对没有保险的病人和低收入人群产生了负面影响。此外,五项研究调查了私有化后医疗服务的获取和公平性:一项赞成,一项中立,三项反对。四项研究调查了成本效益维度,其中三项赞成,一项反对:本综述强调了对医疗私有化的不同观点。沙特阿拉伯等国的研究表明,私有化有利于提高效率和创新,而其他国家,尤其是欧洲国家的研究则强调了不公平和质量下降等负面影响。这强调有必要开展更多调查,以了解私有化对医疗保健的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences (SJMMS) is the official scientific journal of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. It is an international peer-reviewed, general medical journal. The scope of the Journal is to publish research that will be of interest to health specialties both in academic and clinical practice. The Journal aims at disseminating high-powered research results with the objective of turning research into knowledge. It seeks to promote scholarly publishing in medicine and medical sciences. The Journal is published in print and online. The target readers of the Journal include all medical and health professionals in the health cluster such as in medicine, dentistry, nursing, applied medical sciences, clinical pharmacology, public health, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信