Tela’ah Kajian Aksiologi dalam Persepektif Islam dan Sains Modern

Alfi Farikhatul Ula, Muniron
{"title":"Tela’ah Kajian Aksiologi dalam Persepektif Islam dan Sains Modern","authors":"Alfi Farikhatul Ula, Muniron","doi":"10.58401/takwiluna.v5i1.1270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Axiology, as a branch of philosophy, means the knowledge that philosophically explores the 'values' inherent in something. This implies a critical, rational, and speculative examination. Axiology provides benefits in order to anticipate negative developments in human life. Broadly speaking, axiology is divided into two fields, namely ethics and aesthetics. The discussion of these two fields has different starting points between Islamic scholarship and modern Western science. In the construction of Islamic scholarship, knowledge operates within the framework of the Islamic paradigm, where knowledge directly derives from the Qur'an as a revelation text. In the Western historical context, the emergence of the Enlightenment period in the 17th century, which transformed into modernity, became a dividing line between science and religion in the West. This event is interpreted as a rebellion of humanity against God (Christianity), with modernity being the offspring of this rebellious spirit born from the Renaissance. Using a literary approach, this article explores insights by conducting a comparative analysis between the two perspectives. The result indicates that the starting point for ethics as a branch of philosophy is reason, not religion, while Islamic ethics is grounded in the Qur'an and hadith.","PeriodicalId":515491,"journal":{"name":"Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v5i1.1270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Axiology, as a branch of philosophy, means the knowledge that philosophically explores the 'values' inherent in something. This implies a critical, rational, and speculative examination. Axiology provides benefits in order to anticipate negative developments in human life. Broadly speaking, axiology is divided into two fields, namely ethics and aesthetics. The discussion of these two fields has different starting points between Islamic scholarship and modern Western science. In the construction of Islamic scholarship, knowledge operates within the framework of the Islamic paradigm, where knowledge directly derives from the Qur'an as a revelation text. In the Western historical context, the emergence of the Enlightenment period in the 17th century, which transformed into modernity, became a dividing line between science and religion in the West. This event is interpreted as a rebellion of humanity against God (Christianity), with modernity being the offspring of this rebellious spirit born from the Renaissance. Using a literary approach, this article explores insights by conducting a comparative analysis between the two perspectives. The result indicates that the starting point for ethics as a branch of philosophy is reason, not religion, while Islamic ethics is grounded in the Qur'an and hadith.
伊斯兰和现代科学视角下的公理学研究
公理学作为哲学的一个分支,是指从哲学角度探索事物内在 "价值 "的知识。这意味着一种批判性的、理性的和推测性的研究。公理学为预测人类生活中的负面发展提供益处。从广义上讲,公理学分为两个领域,即伦理学和美学。伊斯兰学术和西方现代科学对这两个领域的讨论有着不同的出发点。在伊斯兰学术的构建中,知识在伊斯兰范式的框架内运行,知识直接来源于作为启示文本的《古兰经》。在西方历史背景下,17 世纪启蒙运动时期的兴起转变为现代性,成为西方科学与宗教的分界线。这一事件被解释为人类对上帝(基督教)的反叛,现代性则是文艺复兴时期诞生的反叛精神的后代。本文采用文学方法,通过对这两种观点进行比较分析,探索其中的真知灼见。结果表明,伦理学作为哲学的一个分支,其出发点是理性而非宗教,而伊斯兰伦理学的基础则是《古兰经》和圣训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信