Unraveling the complexity of cyberbullying: Development and validation of a comprehensive questionnaire

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS
Kanakarn Phanniphong , Laongsri Niangchaem , Khahan Na-Nan , Apiwat Arunyaphum
{"title":"Unraveling the complexity of cyberbullying: Development and validation of a comprehensive questionnaire","authors":"Kanakarn Phanniphong ,&nbsp;Laongsri Niangchaem ,&nbsp;Khahan Na-Nan ,&nbsp;Apiwat Arunyaphum","doi":"10.1016/j.tncr.2024.200073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to examine the construct validity and discriminant validity of a cyberbullying questionnaire, as well as explore the practical implications of the findings. The study utilizes exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the measurement model of the cyberbullying questionnaire. Data analysis is conducted using established statistical techniques. The results reveal the presence of six distinct dimensions of cyberbullying: Online Privacy Violation, Online Harassment and Discomfort, Online Exclusion and Privacy Violation, Disturbance and Intimidation, Identity Impersonation, and Spread of Secrets. The questionnaire demonstrates good construct validity and discriminant validity, providing a reliable tool to measure cyberbullying experiences. This study is limited to a specific population and cultural context. Further research is needed to validate the questionnaire in diverse populations and explore the relationship between cyberbullying dimensions and associated outcomes. This study contributes to the understanding of cyberbullying by providing a comprehensive framework and validated measurement tool.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45011,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Corporations Review","volume":"16 3","pages":"Article 200073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1925209924005990/pdfft?md5=c4e24fcf1996209fecfd65ad8c522a5a&pid=1-s2.0-S1925209924005990-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Corporations Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1925209924005990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the construct validity and discriminant validity of a cyberbullying questionnaire, as well as explore the practical implications of the findings. The study utilizes exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the measurement model of the cyberbullying questionnaire. Data analysis is conducted using established statistical techniques. The results reveal the presence of six distinct dimensions of cyberbullying: Online Privacy Violation, Online Harassment and Discomfort, Online Exclusion and Privacy Violation, Disturbance and Intimidation, Identity Impersonation, and Spread of Secrets. The questionnaire demonstrates good construct validity and discriminant validity, providing a reliable tool to measure cyberbullying experiences. This study is limited to a specific population and cultural context. Further research is needed to validate the questionnaire in diverse populations and explore the relationship between cyberbullying dimensions and associated outcomes. This study contributes to the understanding of cyberbullying by providing a comprehensive framework and validated measurement tool.

揭示网络欺凌的复杂性:综合问卷的开发与验证
本研究旨在检验网络欺凌问卷的建构效度和判别效度,并探讨研究结果的实际意义。研究采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)来验证网络欺凌问卷的测量模型。数据分析采用了成熟的统计技术。结果显示,网络欺凌存在六个不同的维度:在线隐私侵犯、在线骚扰和不适、在线排斥和隐私侵犯、干扰和恐吓、身份冒充和秘密传播。该问卷具有良好的建构效度和判别效度,是测量网络欺凌经历的可靠工具。本研究仅限于特定人群和文化背景。还需要进一步研究在不同人群中验证问卷,并探索网络欺凌维度与相关结果之间的关系。本研究提供了一个全面的框架和经过验证的测量工具,有助于加深对网络欺凌的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信