Assessment of bulk-fill of resins microhardness longitudinal

Fernanda Santos Araújo, W. M. Takeshita, R. C. D. Amaral, Adriano Augusto Melo de Mendonça
{"title":"Assessment of bulk-fill of resins microhardness longitudinal","authors":"Fernanda Santos Araújo, W. M. Takeshita, R. C. D. Amaral, Adriano Augusto Melo de Mendonça","doi":"10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to assess the polymerization effectiveness of bulk-fill composite resins in longitudinal microhardness. Methods: Blocks of bulk-fill composite resin with thicknesses of 6 mm were analyzed with Vickers microhardness. The resin blocks were divided into two groups (n=6): resin AURA and OPUS. The microhardness test was performed before (base and top) and after (longitudinal microhardness) sectioning the blocks at distances of 2 mm,  4 mm, and 6 mm from the top of the block. The mean microhardness values were tabulated and subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results: The OPUS bulk-fill resin samples presented microhardness means of 55.9 kgf/mm2, 53.7 kgf/mm2, and 49.3 kgf/mm2, the AURA bulk-fill resin samples presented microhardness means of 57,02 kgf/mm2, 55,86 kgf/mm2 e 51,77 kgf/mm2 for the distances of 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm, respectively. Tukey’s statistical test showed a significant difference in microhardness values at different distances of 2 mm,  4 mm, and 6 mm (p<0.001) for each resin. Although there was a statistically significant difference within and between the groups assessed, all samples showed polymerization effectiveness when comparing the top and base of the block. Conclusion: Polymerization was effective in different thicknesses (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm) in both resins studied. The microhardness ratio was adequate when comparing the base and top.","PeriodicalId":504767,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess the polymerization effectiveness of bulk-fill composite resins in longitudinal microhardness. Methods: Blocks of bulk-fill composite resin with thicknesses of 6 mm were analyzed with Vickers microhardness. The resin blocks were divided into two groups (n=6): resin AURA and OPUS. The microhardness test was performed before (base and top) and after (longitudinal microhardness) sectioning the blocks at distances of 2 mm,  4 mm, and 6 mm from the top of the block. The mean microhardness values were tabulated and subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results: The OPUS bulk-fill resin samples presented microhardness means of 55.9 kgf/mm2, 53.7 kgf/mm2, and 49.3 kgf/mm2, the AURA bulk-fill resin samples presented microhardness means of 57,02 kgf/mm2, 55,86 kgf/mm2 e 51,77 kgf/mm2 for the distances of 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm, respectively. Tukey’s statistical test showed a significant difference in microhardness values at different distances of 2 mm,  4 mm, and 6 mm (p<0.001) for each resin. Although there was a statistically significant difference within and between the groups assessed, all samples showed polymerization effectiveness when comparing the top and base of the block. Conclusion: Polymerization was effective in different thicknesses (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm) in both resins studied. The microhardness ratio was adequate when comparing the base and top.
树脂微硬度纵向体积填充评估
目的:本研究旨在评估体积填充复合树脂在纵向微硬度方面的聚合效果。方法:对厚度为 6 毫米的块状体填充复合树脂进行维氏硬度分析:用维氏硬度分析厚度为 6 毫米的块状填充复合树脂。树脂块分为两组(n=6):AURA 树脂和 OPUS 树脂。显微硬度测试分别在从树脂块顶部开始的 2 毫米、4 毫米和 6 毫米距离处进行(底部和顶部)和(纵向显微硬度)切片之前和之后进行。将平均显微硬度值制成表格,并进行方差分析和 Tukey 检验(P<0.05)。结果OPUS 体积填充树脂样品的显微硬度平均值分别为 55.9 kgf/mm2、53.7 kgf/mm2 和 49.3 kgf/mm2,AURA 体积填充树脂样品在距离 2 mm、4 mm 和 6 mm 处的显微硬度平均值分别为 57.02 kgf/mm2、55.86 kgf/mm2 和 51.77 kgf/mm2。Tukey 统计检验表明,每种树脂在 2 毫米、4 毫米和 6 毫米的不同距离上的显微硬度值差异显著(p<0.001)。尽管在所评估的组内和组间存在显著的统计学差异,但所有样品在块体顶部和底部的聚合效果都有比较。结论所研究的两种树脂在不同厚度(2 毫米、4 毫米和 6 毫米)下的聚合均有效。在比较底部和顶部时,显微硬度比是适当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信