Weak Correlation Between Perceived and Measured Intensive Care Unit Nursing Workload

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
F. Wallet, Audrey Bonnet, Vincent Thiriaud, Anaëlle Caillet, Vincent Piriou, C. Vacheron, Arnaud Friggeri, Mikhail Dziadzko
{"title":"Weak Correlation Between Perceived and Measured Intensive Care Unit Nursing Workload","authors":"F. Wallet, Audrey Bonnet, Vincent Thiriaud, Anaëlle Caillet, Vincent Piriou, C. Vacheron, Arnaud Friggeri, Mikhail Dziadzko","doi":"10.1097/ncq.0000000000000774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Efficient management of nursing workload in the intensive care unit (ICU) is essential for patient safety, care quality, and nurse well-being. Current ICU-specific workload assessment scores lack comprehensive coverage of nursing activities and perceived workload.\n \n \n \n The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between ICU nurses’ perceived workload and the Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS).\n \n \n \n In a 45-bed adult ICU at a tertiary academic hospital, nurses’ perceived shift workload (measured with an 11-point Likert scale) was correlated with the NEMS, calculated manually and electronically.\n \n \n \n The study included 1734 observations. The perceived workload was recorded for 77.6% of observations. A weak positive correlation was found between perceived and objectively measured workload.\n \n \n \n Findings indicate a need to consider the multifaceted nature of nursing activities and individual workload perceptions in the ICU.\n","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ncq.0000000000000774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient management of nursing workload in the intensive care unit (ICU) is essential for patient safety, care quality, and nurse well-being. Current ICU-specific workload assessment scores lack comprehensive coverage of nursing activities and perceived workload. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between ICU nurses’ perceived workload and the Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS). In a 45-bed adult ICU at a tertiary academic hospital, nurses’ perceived shift workload (measured with an 11-point Likert scale) was correlated with the NEMS, calculated manually and electronically. The study included 1734 observations. The perceived workload was recorded for 77.6% of observations. A weak positive correlation was found between perceived and objectively measured workload. Findings indicate a need to consider the multifaceted nature of nursing activities and individual workload perceptions in the ICU.
重症监护室护理工作量的感知与测量之间的相关性较弱
有效管理重症监护室(ICU)的护理工作量对患者安全、护理质量和护士福祉至关重要。目前针对 ICU 的工作量评估评分缺乏对护理活动和感知工作量的全面覆盖。 本研究旨在评估重症监护室护士感知工作量与九等量护理人力使用评分(NEMS)之间的相关性。 在一家拥有 45 张病床的三级学术医院成人重症监护病房中,护士的感知轮班工作量(采用 11 点李克特量表测量)与 NEMS(手动和电子计算)之间存在相关性。 研究包括 1734 次观察。77.6%的观察记录了感知工作量。研究发现,感知工作量与客观测量的工作量之间存在微弱的正相关。 研究结果表明,有必要考虑重症监护室护理活动的多面性和个人的工作量感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信