Summarizing the advantages of the intraflap versus cranial-caudal anastomoses in stacked free flap breast reconstruction.

Alberto Franchi, L. Patanè, Bettina Gogh, Florian Jung, Abdul Rahman Jandali
{"title":"Summarizing the advantages of the intraflap versus cranial-caudal anastomoses in stacked free flap breast reconstruction.","authors":"Alberto Franchi, L. Patanè, Bettina Gogh, Florian Jung, Abdul Rahman Jandali","doi":"10.1055/a-2321-6279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Getting enough volume in autologous breast reconstruction can be difficult and transferring multiple free flaps to reconstruct a single breast can provide a solution to that problem. How to connect the free flaps pedicles to the recipient site has been a point of discussion in the literature and two main approaches have been described. The first one involves using the caudal stumps of the internal mammary (IM) vessels and is usually referred to “cranial-caudal” approach. The second one implies the anastomosis between one flap’s pedicle to a branch of the other one . This technique has been named in different ways in the literature: intraflap, flow-through, daisy-chain, chain-link and others.\nIn the present letter we want to list what we think are all the advantages of the intraflap approach compared to the cranial-caudal one. To our knowledge, some of them have not been mentioned in the available literature. \n","PeriodicalId":505284,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2321-6279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Getting enough volume in autologous breast reconstruction can be difficult and transferring multiple free flaps to reconstruct a single breast can provide a solution to that problem. How to connect the free flaps pedicles to the recipient site has been a point of discussion in the literature and two main approaches have been described. The first one involves using the caudal stumps of the internal mammary (IM) vessels and is usually referred to “cranial-caudal” approach. The second one implies the anastomosis between one flap’s pedicle to a branch of the other one . This technique has been named in different ways in the literature: intraflap, flow-through, daisy-chain, chain-link and others. In the present letter we want to list what we think are all the advantages of the intraflap approach compared to the cranial-caudal one. To our knowledge, some of them have not been mentioned in the available literature.
总结堆叠式游离皮瓣乳房重建中皮瓣内吻合与颅尾吻合的优势。
要在自体乳房重建中获得足够的乳房体积是很困难的,而转移多个游离瓣重建单个乳房可以解决这一问题。如何将游离瓣蒂连接到受体部位一直是文献讨论的焦点,主要有两种方法。第一种是使用乳腺内(IM)血管的尾部残端,通常称为 "头颅-尾部 "法。第二种方法是将一个皮瓣的蒂与另一个皮瓣的分支吻合。在这封信中,我们想列出我们认为瓣内法与头颅-尾骨法相比的所有优点。据我们所知,其中一些优点在现有文献中尚未提及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信