Qualitative analysis of the factors associated with whistleblowing intentions among athletes from six European countries

John Toner, Luke Jones, Lucas R. W. Fairs, C. Mantis, Vassilis Barkoukis, Garyfallia Daroglou, John L. Perry, Andrei V. Micle, Nikolaos C. Theodorou, Sabina Shakhverdieva, Marius Stoicescu, Constantin Pompiliu-Nicolae, M. Vesić, N. Dikić, M. Andjelkovic, Jesús Muñoz-Guerra Revilla, Elena García-Grimau, Miguel A. E. Martínez, Javier A. Amigo, Anne Schomöller, A. Nicholls
{"title":"Qualitative analysis of the factors associated with whistleblowing intentions among athletes from six European countries","authors":"John Toner, Luke Jones, Lucas R. W. Fairs, C. Mantis, Vassilis Barkoukis, Garyfallia Daroglou, John L. Perry, Andrei V. Micle, Nikolaos C. Theodorou, Sabina Shakhverdieva, Marius Stoicescu, Constantin Pompiliu-Nicolae, M. Vesić, N. Dikić, M. Andjelkovic, Jesús Muñoz-Guerra Revilla, Elena García-Grimau, Miguel A. E. Martínez, Javier A. Amigo, Anne Schomöller, A. Nicholls","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1335258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although whistleblowing is thought to represent an effective mechanism for detecting and uncovering doping in sport, it has yet to become a widely adopted practice. Understanding the factors that encourage or discourage whistleblowing is of vital importance for the promotion of this practice and the development of pedagogical material to enhance the likelihood of whistleblowing. The current study employed a qualitative methodology to explore the personal and organisational factors that underpin intentions to blow the whistle or that may lead to engagement in whistleblowing behaviours in sport. Thirty-three competitive athletes across a range of sports took part in a semi-structured interview which sought to explore what they would do should they encounter a doping scenario. Content analysis revealed that whistleblowing is a dynamic process characterised by the interaction of a range of personal and organisational factors in determining the intention to report PED use. These factors included moral reasoning, a desire to keep the matter “in-house”, perceived personal costs, institutional attitudes to doping, and social support. Analysis revealed a number of “intervening events”, including a perceived lack of organisational protection (e.g., ethical leadership) within some sporting sub-cultures, which present an important obstacle to whistleblowing. The intention to report doping was underpinned by a “fairness-loyalty trade-off” which involved athletes choosing to adhere to either fairness norms (which relate to a sense that all people and groups are treated equally) or loyalty norms (which reflect preferential treatment towards an in-group) when deciding whether they would blow the whistle. The promotion of fairness norms that emphasise a group's collective interests might encourage athletes to view whistleblowing as a means of increasing group cohesiveness and effectiveness and thereby increase the likelihood of this practice.","PeriodicalId":509602,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1335258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although whistleblowing is thought to represent an effective mechanism for detecting and uncovering doping in sport, it has yet to become a widely adopted practice. Understanding the factors that encourage or discourage whistleblowing is of vital importance for the promotion of this practice and the development of pedagogical material to enhance the likelihood of whistleblowing. The current study employed a qualitative methodology to explore the personal and organisational factors that underpin intentions to blow the whistle or that may lead to engagement in whistleblowing behaviours in sport. Thirty-three competitive athletes across a range of sports took part in a semi-structured interview which sought to explore what they would do should they encounter a doping scenario. Content analysis revealed that whistleblowing is a dynamic process characterised by the interaction of a range of personal and organisational factors in determining the intention to report PED use. These factors included moral reasoning, a desire to keep the matter “in-house”, perceived personal costs, institutional attitudes to doping, and social support. Analysis revealed a number of “intervening events”, including a perceived lack of organisational protection (e.g., ethical leadership) within some sporting sub-cultures, which present an important obstacle to whistleblowing. The intention to report doping was underpinned by a “fairness-loyalty trade-off” which involved athletes choosing to adhere to either fairness norms (which relate to a sense that all people and groups are treated equally) or loyalty norms (which reflect preferential treatment towards an in-group) when deciding whether they would blow the whistle. The promotion of fairness norms that emphasise a group's collective interests might encourage athletes to view whistleblowing as a means of increasing group cohesiveness and effectiveness and thereby increase the likelihood of this practice.
对欧洲六国运动员举报意向相关因素的定性分析
尽管举报被认为是发现和揭露在体育运动中使用兴奋剂的一种有效机制,但它尚未被 广泛采用。了解鼓励或阻止举报的因素,对于推广这种做法和编写教材以提高举报的可能性至关重 要。本研究采用定性方法,探讨了支持举报意图或可能导致参与体育举报行为的个人和组织因素。33 名不同运动项目的竞技运动员参加了半结构式访谈,目的是探讨他们在遇到使用兴奋剂的情况时会怎么做。内容分析显示,举报是一个动态过程,其特点是一系列个人和组织因素相互作用,决定了举报使用 PED 的意向。这些因素包括道德推理、"内部 "处理的愿望、感知到的个人成本、机构对使用兴奋剂的态度以及社会支持。分析表明了一些 "干预事件",包括在一些体育亚文化中,人们认为缺乏组织保护(如道德领导),这对举报构成了重要障碍。运动员在决定是否举报时,会根据 "公平与忠诚的权衡 "来选择遵守公平准则(与所有 人和群体都受到平等对待的意识有关)或忠诚准则(反映了对内部群体的优待)。提倡强调群体集体利益的公平准则,可能会鼓励运动员将揭发视为增强群体凝聚力和效率的一种手段,从而增加这种做法的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信