Diagnostic yield of an inherited retinal disease gene panel in retinopathy of unknown origin

Stéphane Abramowicz, Audrey Meunier, L. Postelmans, L. Caspers, Francis Corazza, M. De Bruyne, S. Van de Sompele, E. de Baere, Bart P Leroy, F. Willermain, D. Draganova
{"title":"Diagnostic yield of an inherited retinal disease gene panel in retinopathy of unknown origin","authors":"Stéphane Abramowicz, Audrey Meunier, L. Postelmans, L. Caspers, Francis Corazza, M. De Bruyne, S. Van de Sompele, E. de Baere, Bart P Leroy, F. Willermain, D. Draganova","doi":"10.1097/iae.0000000000004155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Evaluating the presence of class 3, 4 and 5 genetic variants in inherited retinal disease (IRD) genes in patients with retinopathy of unknown origin (RUO).\n \n \n \n Multicentric retrospective study of RUO cases diagnosed between January 2012 and February 2022. General and ophthalmological history, complete ophthalmological examination, anti-retinal antibodies and IRD gene panel results were analyzed in every patient. Four RUO categories were defined: non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR), unilateral pigmentary retinopathy (UPR), asymmetrical pigmentary retinopathy (APR) and acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR).\n \n \n \n We included 12 patients (9 females) across these four RUO categories. Mean age at inclusion was 45.6 years (20 – 68 years). Seven patients demonstrated class 3 variants in IRD genes. Of these, 2 also demonstrated class 5 variants in other IRD genes. The remaining 5 patients had negative panel results. IRD gene panel analysis allowed diagnosis refinement in 1 (8.3%) npAIR patient in our RUO cohort. When considering the npAIR subpopulation only, a higher diagnostic yield of 20% (1/5 patients) was achieved.\n \n \n \n Every suspected npAIR patient should benefit from gene panel testing in order not to overlook undiagnosed IRDs. In contrast, UPR, APR and AZOOR subpopulations did not benefit from genetic analysis in this study.\n","PeriodicalId":21178,"journal":{"name":"Retina","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating the presence of class 3, 4 and 5 genetic variants in inherited retinal disease (IRD) genes in patients with retinopathy of unknown origin (RUO). Multicentric retrospective study of RUO cases diagnosed between January 2012 and February 2022. General and ophthalmological history, complete ophthalmological examination, anti-retinal antibodies and IRD gene panel results were analyzed in every patient. Four RUO categories were defined: non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR), unilateral pigmentary retinopathy (UPR), asymmetrical pigmentary retinopathy (APR) and acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR). We included 12 patients (9 females) across these four RUO categories. Mean age at inclusion was 45.6 years (20 – 68 years). Seven patients demonstrated class 3 variants in IRD genes. Of these, 2 also demonstrated class 5 variants in other IRD genes. The remaining 5 patients had negative panel results. IRD gene panel analysis allowed diagnosis refinement in 1 (8.3%) npAIR patient in our RUO cohort. When considering the npAIR subpopulation only, a higher diagnostic yield of 20% (1/5 patients) was achieved. Every suspected npAIR patient should benefit from gene panel testing in order not to overlook undiagnosed IRDs. In contrast, UPR, APR and AZOOR subpopulations did not benefit from genetic analysis in this study.
遗传性视网膜疾病基因面板对不明原因视网膜病变的诊断率
评估不明原因视网膜病变(RUO)患者中是否存在遗传性视网膜疾病(IRD)基因的 3、4 和 5 类遗传变异。 对2012年1月至2022年2月期间确诊的RUO病例进行多中心回顾性研究。对每位患者的一般病史和眼科病史、全面眼科检查、抗视网膜抗体和 IRD 基因面板结果进行了分析。我们定义了四种视网膜病变类型:非副肿瘤性自身免疫性视网膜病变(npAIR)、单侧色素性视网膜病变(UPR)、不对称色素性视网膜病变(APR)和急性带状隐匿性外层视网膜病变(AZOOR)。 我们共纳入了这四类视网膜病变的 12 名患者(9 名女性)。纳入时的平均年龄为 45.6 岁(20 - 68 岁)。七名患者的 IRD 基因出现了 3 级变异。其中,2 名患者的其他 IRD 基因也出现了 5 级变异。其余 5 名患者的基因组结果为阴性。在我们的 RUO 队列中,IRD 基因面板分析使 1 名(8.3%)npAIR 患者的诊断得到细化。如果只考虑 npAIR 亚群,则诊断率更高,达到 20%(1/5 例患者)。 每一位疑似 npAIR 患者都应受益于基因组检测,以免忽视未确诊的 IRD。相比之下,本研究中的 UPR、APR 和 AZOOR 亚群并未从基因分析中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信