Comparative Efficacy of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexamethasone/Metoclopramide in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Headaches

Khurram Zohaib, Muhammad Ilyas, Sawera Tahir, Muhammad Asif, Waqar Qamar, Faisal Shiraz, Muhammad Waseem Abbas Khan, Ayesha Saman, Aqsa Iqbal, Sonya Bashir, Obidullah
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexamethasone/Metoclopramide in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Headaches","authors":"Khurram Zohaib, Muhammad Ilyas, Sawera Tahir, Muhammad Asif, Waqar Qamar, Faisal Shiraz, Muhammad Waseem Abbas Khan, Ayesha Saman, Aqsa Iqbal, Sonya Bashir, Obidullah","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Migraine, a neurological condition characterized by intense and debilitating headaches, poses a significant public health issue affecting millions worldwide. The complexity of migraine pathophysiology often makes its management challenging. Despite various treatment modalities, the quest for the most effective and rapid relief from acute migraine episodes remains a pertinent concern in clinical practice.\nObjective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of magnesium sulfate and a combination of dexamethasone/metoclopramide in treating acute migraine headaches to identify the most effective treatment option for rapid pain relief.\nMethods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Emergency Medicine, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, over six months from November 25, 2015, to May 24, 2016. A total of 70 patients were enrolled, with 35 patients assigned to Group A and 35 to Group B. Group A received 1g of magnesium sulfate in 100ml normal saline over 15 minutes, while Group B received 8mg of dexamethasone and 10mg of metoclopramide in a similar saline solution and infusion time. Pain severity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline and two hours after medication administration. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 25, with mean ± standard deviation calculated for age and NRS scores. Frequency and percentages were computed for gender and efficacy. Efficacy between the groups was compared using Chi-square tests, and stratification was applied to control for age and gender, followed by post-stratification Chi-square testing. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\nResults: The results showed a significant difference in pain relief between the two groups. In Group A, 23 patients (65.7%) reported significant pain relief compared to 13 patients (34.3%) in Group B (p=0.017). Stratification by age revealed that in patients under 30 years, 11 patients (31.4%) in Group A experienced pain relief compared to 8 patients (22.9%) in Group B (p=0.202). For patients over 30 years, 12 patients (34.3%) in Group A reported pain relief, compared to 5 patients (14.3%) in Group B (p=0.084). Gender stratification showed that among males, 5 (14.3%) in Group A experienced pain relief compared to 9 (25.7%) in Group B (p=0.408), while among females, 18 (51.4%) in Group A reported pain relief compared to 4 (11.4%) in Group B (p=0.000).\nConclusion: Magnesium sulfate was found to be a more effective and faster-acting medication compared to a combination of dexamethasone and metoclopramide for the treatment of acute migraine headaches. This finding highlights the potential of magnesium sulfate as a preferred option for rapid pain relief in clinical settings, particularly for female patients.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Migraine, a neurological condition characterized by intense and debilitating headaches, poses a significant public health issue affecting millions worldwide. The complexity of migraine pathophysiology often makes its management challenging. Despite various treatment modalities, the quest for the most effective and rapid relief from acute migraine episodes remains a pertinent concern in clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of magnesium sulfate and a combination of dexamethasone/metoclopramide in treating acute migraine headaches to identify the most effective treatment option for rapid pain relief. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Emergency Medicine, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, over six months from November 25, 2015, to May 24, 2016. A total of 70 patients were enrolled, with 35 patients assigned to Group A and 35 to Group B. Group A received 1g of magnesium sulfate in 100ml normal saline over 15 minutes, while Group B received 8mg of dexamethasone and 10mg of metoclopramide in a similar saline solution and infusion time. Pain severity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline and two hours after medication administration. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 25, with mean ± standard deviation calculated for age and NRS scores. Frequency and percentages were computed for gender and efficacy. Efficacy between the groups was compared using Chi-square tests, and stratification was applied to control for age and gender, followed by post-stratification Chi-square testing. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The results showed a significant difference in pain relief between the two groups. In Group A, 23 patients (65.7%) reported significant pain relief compared to 13 patients (34.3%) in Group B (p=0.017). Stratification by age revealed that in patients under 30 years, 11 patients (31.4%) in Group A experienced pain relief compared to 8 patients (22.9%) in Group B (p=0.202). For patients over 30 years, 12 patients (34.3%) in Group A reported pain relief, compared to 5 patients (14.3%) in Group B (p=0.084). Gender stratification showed that among males, 5 (14.3%) in Group A experienced pain relief compared to 9 (25.7%) in Group B (p=0.408), while among females, 18 (51.4%) in Group A reported pain relief compared to 4 (11.4%) in Group B (p=0.000). Conclusion: Magnesium sulfate was found to be a more effective and faster-acting medication compared to a combination of dexamethasone and metoclopramide for the treatment of acute migraine headaches. This finding highlights the potential of magnesium sulfate as a preferred option for rapid pain relief in clinical settings, particularly for female patients.
硫酸镁和地塞米松/甲氧氯普胺治疗急性偏头痛的疗效比较
背景:偏头痛是一种以剧烈头痛和使人衰弱为特征的神经系统疾病,是影响全球数百万人的重大公共卫生问题。偏头痛病理生理学的复杂性往往使其治疗具有挑战性。尽管治疗方法多种多样,但如何最有效、最快速地缓解偏头痛急性发作仍是临床实践中的一个相关问题:本研究旨在比较硫酸镁和地塞米松/甲氧氯普胺联合治疗急性偏头痛的疗效,以确定快速缓解疼痛的最有效治疗方案:这项随机对照试验于2015年11月25日至2016年5月24日在拉瓦尔品第贝娜齐尔-布托医院急诊医学科进行,历时6个月。A 组在 100 毫升生理盐水中加入 1 克硫酸镁,持续 15 分钟;B 组在类似的生理盐水中加入 8 毫克地塞米松和 10 毫克甲氧氯普胺,输注时间相同。在基线和用药两小时后,使用数字评分量表(NRS)对疼痛严重程度进行评估。数据使用 SPSS 25 版进行分析,计算年龄和 NRS 评分的平均值 ± 标准差。计算性别和疗效的频率和百分比。组间疗效比较采用卡方检验(Chi-square tests),并进行分层以控制年龄和性别,然后进行分层后卡方检验。P值≤0.05为具有统计学意义:结果显示,两组患者的疼痛缓解程度存在明显差异。在 A 组中,23 名患者(65.7%)报告疼痛明显缓解,而在 B 组中,13 名患者(34.3%)报告疼痛明显缓解(P=0.017)。按年龄分层显示,在 30 岁以下的患者中,A 组有 11 名患者(31.4%)的疼痛得到缓解,而 B 组只有 8 名患者(22.9%)(P=0.202)。在 30 岁以上的患者中,A 组有 12 名患者(34.3%)报告疼痛缓解,而 B 组只有 5 名患者(14.3%)(P=0.084)。性别分层显示,男性患者中,A 组有 5 人(14.3%)疼痛缓解,B 组有 9 人(25.7%)(P=0.408);女性患者中,A 组有 18 人(51.4%)疼痛缓解,B 组有 4 人(11.4%)(P=0.000):在治疗急性偏头痛方面,硫酸镁比地塞米松和甲氧氯普胺联合用药更有效、起效更快。这一发现凸显了硫酸镁作为临床快速止痛首选药物的潜力,尤其是对女性患者而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信