O. Churuksaeva, L. A. Kolomiets, A. L. Chernyshova, A. Villert, M. O. Ochirov, Yu. M. Trushchuk, A. A. Maltseva, L. Tashireva
{"title":"Controversies in minimally invasive surgery for invasive cervical cancer","authors":"O. Churuksaeva, L. A. Kolomiets, A. L. Chernyshova, A. Villert, M. O. Ochirov, Yu. M. Trushchuk, A. A. Maltseva, L. Tashireva","doi":"10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-2-26-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Determination of the feasibility of performing minimally invasive surgery for invasive cervical cancer and identification of criteria for optimal surgical access that ensures safety, effectiveness, and satisfactory immediate and long-term results remain challenging in gynecological oncology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term treatment outcomes in patients with invasive cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy via laparotomy compared to those who underwent minimally invasive surgery. Material and methods. Treatment outcomes of 91 patients with invasive carvical cancer were analyzed. The assessment of the objective tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using the RECIST scale (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) was confirmed by clinical, ultrasound and CT/ MRI findings. The Kaplan-Maier curves and the log-rank criterion were used to compare the time of relapse-free and overall survivals. Statistical analysis and visualization of the analysis results were performed using prism 9.5.1 (GraphPad, USA). Results. The presence of parametrial lymphovascular space invasion and the frequency of lymphadenopathy were comparable for both groups of patients. there were no statistically significant differences in the number of the resected lymph nodes, but there was a statistically significant difference in volume of blood loss and the duration of surgery between the groups (p=0.0001). Every third patient was diagnosed with stage IIIC after surgery (pelvic lymph node lesion). Intraoperative complications were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group (6.7 % vs 13 %). No significant differences in the proportion of relapses of the disease between the groups were found (9.6 % in the laparotomy group vs 11.7 % in the laparoscopy group). There were no significant differences in overall and relapse-free survival between the groups. Conclusion. Minimally invasive surgery is a promising and adequate surgical technique for the treatment of cervical cancer. However, additional studies are needed to determine the indications for these surgeries.","PeriodicalId":21881,"journal":{"name":"Siberian journal of oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-2-26-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background. Determination of the feasibility of performing minimally invasive surgery for invasive cervical cancer and identification of criteria for optimal surgical access that ensures safety, effectiveness, and satisfactory immediate and long-term results remain challenging in gynecological oncology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term treatment outcomes in patients with invasive cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy via laparotomy compared to those who underwent minimally invasive surgery. Material and methods. Treatment outcomes of 91 patients with invasive carvical cancer were analyzed. The assessment of the objective tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using the RECIST scale (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) was confirmed by clinical, ultrasound and CT/ MRI findings. The Kaplan-Maier curves and the log-rank criterion were used to compare the time of relapse-free and overall survivals. Statistical analysis and visualization of the analysis results were performed using prism 9.5.1 (GraphPad, USA). Results. The presence of parametrial lymphovascular space invasion and the frequency of lymphadenopathy were comparable for both groups of patients. there were no statistically significant differences in the number of the resected lymph nodes, but there was a statistically significant difference in volume of blood loss and the duration of surgery between the groups (p=0.0001). Every third patient was diagnosed with stage IIIC after surgery (pelvic lymph node lesion). Intraoperative complications were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group (6.7 % vs 13 %). No significant differences in the proportion of relapses of the disease between the groups were found (9.6 % in the laparotomy group vs 11.7 % in the laparoscopy group). There were no significant differences in overall and relapse-free survival between the groups. Conclusion. Minimally invasive surgery is a promising and adequate surgical technique for the treatment of cervical cancer. However, additional studies are needed to determine the indications for these surgeries.
期刊介绍:
The main objectives of the journal are: -to promote the establishment of Russia’s leading worldwide positions in the field of experimental and clinical oncology- to create the international discussion platform intended to cover all aspects of basic and clinical cancer research, including carcinogenesis, molecular biology, epidemiology, cancer prevention, diagnosis and multimodality treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy), anesthetic management, medical and social rehabilitation, palliative care as well as the improvement of life quality of cancer patients- to encourage promising young scientists to be actively involved in cancer research programs- to provide a platform for researches and doctors all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in cancer related problems. (to create a communication platform for the expansion of cooperation between Russian and foreign professional associations).- to provide the information about the latest worldwide achievements in different fields of oncology The most important tasks of the journal are: -to encourage scientists to publish their research results- to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest - to invite the most prominent Russian and foreign authors to share their latest research findings with cancer research community- to promote the exchange of research information, clinical experience, current trends and the recent developments in the field of oncology as well as to review interesting cases encountered by colleagues all over the world- to expand the editorial board and reviewers with the involvement of well-known Russian and foreign experts- to provide open access to full text articles- to include the journal into the international database- to increase the journal’s impact factor- to promote the journal to the International and Russian markets