Controversies in minimally invasive surgery for invasive cervical cancer

Q4 Medicine
O. Churuksaeva, L. A. Kolomiets, A. L. Chernyshova, A. Villert, M. O. Ochirov, Yu. M. Trushchuk, A. A. Maltseva, L. Tashireva
{"title":"Controversies in minimally invasive surgery for invasive cervical cancer","authors":"O. Churuksaeva, L. A. Kolomiets, A. L. Chernyshova, A. Villert, M. O. Ochirov, Yu. M. Trushchuk, A. A. Maltseva, L. Tashireva","doi":"10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-2-26-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Determination of the feasibility of performing minimally invasive surgery for invasive cervical cancer and identification of criteria for optimal surgical access that ensures safety, effectiveness, and satisfactory immediate and long-term results remain challenging in gynecological oncology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term treatment outcomes in patients with invasive cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy via laparotomy compared to those who underwent minimally invasive surgery. Material and methods. Treatment outcomes of 91 patients with invasive carvical cancer were analyzed. The assessment of the objective tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using the RECIST scale (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) was confirmed by clinical, ultrasound and CT/ MRI findings. The Kaplan-Maier curves and the log-rank criterion were used to compare the time of relapse-free and overall survivals. Statistical analysis and visualization of the analysis results were performed using prism 9.5.1 (GraphPad, USA). Results. The presence of parametrial lymphovascular space invasion and the frequency of lymphadenopathy were comparable for both groups of patients. there were no statistically significant differences in the number of the resected lymph nodes, but there was a statistically significant difference in volume of blood loss and the duration of surgery between the groups (p=0.0001). Every third patient was diagnosed with stage IIIC after surgery (pelvic lymph node lesion). Intraoperative complications were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group (6.7 % vs 13 %). No significant differences in the proportion of relapses of the disease between the groups were found (9.6 % in the laparotomy group vs 11.7 % in the laparoscopy group). There were no significant differences in overall and relapse-free survival between the groups. Conclusion. Minimally invasive surgery is a promising and adequate surgical technique for the treatment of cervical cancer. However, additional studies are needed to determine the indications for these surgeries.","PeriodicalId":21881,"journal":{"name":"Siberian journal of oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-2-26-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Determination of the feasibility of performing minimally invasive surgery for invasive cervical cancer and identification of criteria for optimal surgical access that ensures safety, effectiveness, and satisfactory immediate and long-term results remain challenging in gynecological oncology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term treatment outcomes in patients with invasive cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy via laparotomy compared to those who underwent minimally invasive surgery. Material and methods. Treatment outcomes of 91 patients with invasive carvical cancer were analyzed. The assessment of the objective tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using the RECIST scale (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) was confirmed by clinical, ultrasound and CT/ MRI findings. The Kaplan-Maier curves and the log-rank criterion were used to compare the time of relapse-free and overall survivals. Statistical analysis and visualization of the analysis results were performed using prism 9.5.1 (GraphPad, USA). Results. The presence of parametrial lymphovascular space invasion and the frequency of lymphadenopathy were comparable for both groups of patients. there were no statistically significant differences in the number of the resected lymph nodes, but there was a statistically significant difference in volume of blood loss and the duration of surgery between the groups (p=0.0001). Every third patient was diagnosed with stage IIIC after surgery (pelvic lymph node lesion). Intraoperative complications were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group (6.7 % vs 13 %). No significant differences in the proportion of relapses of the disease between the groups were found (9.6 % in the laparotomy group vs 11.7 % in the laparoscopy group). There were no significant differences in overall and relapse-free survival between the groups. Conclusion. Minimally invasive surgery is a promising and adequate surgical technique for the treatment of cervical cancer. However, additional studies are needed to determine the indications for these surgeries.
侵袭性宫颈癌微创手术的争议
背景。在妇科肿瘤学领域,确定对浸润性宫颈癌实施微创手术的可行性以及确定最佳手术入路的标准,以确保安全、有效以及令人满意的近期和远期疗效,仍然是一项挑战。本研究旨在评估通过开腹手术接受根治性子宫切除术的浸润性宫颈癌患者与接受微创手术的患者的近期和远期治疗效果。材料和方法分析了 91 例浸润性宫颈癌患者的治疗效果。通过临床、超声波和 CT/ MRI 检查结果,使用 RECIST 量表(实体瘤反应评估标准)评估肿瘤对新辅助化疗的客观反应。采用卡普兰-迈尔曲线和对数秩标准比较无复发生存期和总生存期。使用 prism 9.5.1(GraphPad,美国)对分析结果进行统计分析和可视化。结果两组患者的宫旁淋巴管间隙侵犯情况和淋巴结病变频率相当。两组患者切除的淋巴结数量无统计学差异,但两组患者的失血量和手术时间差异有统计学意义(P=0.0001)。术后每三名患者中就有一人被诊断为 IIIC 期(盆腔淋巴结病变)。腹腔镜手术组的术中并发症明显低于开腹手术组(6.7% vs 13%)。两组患者的复发率无明显差异(开腹手术组为9.6%,腹腔镜手术组为11.7%)。两组患者的总存活率和无复发存活率无明显差异。结论。微创手术是治疗宫颈癌的一种很有前景且适当的手术技术。然而,还需要更多的研究来确定这些手术的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Siberian journal of oncology
Siberian journal of oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objectives of the journal are: -to promote the establishment of Russia’s leading worldwide positions in the field of experimental and clinical oncology- to create the international discussion platform intended to cover all aspects of basic and clinical cancer research, including carcinogenesis, molecular biology, epidemiology, cancer prevention, diagnosis and multimodality treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy), anesthetic management, medical and social rehabilitation, palliative care as well as the improvement of life quality of cancer patients- to encourage promising young scientists to be actively involved in cancer research programs- to provide a platform for researches and doctors all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in cancer related problems. (to create a communication platform for the expansion of cooperation between Russian and foreign professional associations).- to provide the information about the latest worldwide achievements in different fields of oncology The most important tasks of the journal are: -to encourage scientists to publish their research results- to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest - to invite the most prominent Russian and foreign authors to share their latest research findings with cancer research community- to promote the exchange of research information, clinical experience, current trends and the recent developments in the field of oncology as well as to review interesting cases encountered by colleagues all over the world- to expand the editorial board and reviewers with the involvement of well-known Russian and foreign experts- to provide open access to full text articles- to include the journal into the international database- to increase the journal’s impact factor- to promote the journal to the International and Russian markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信