Design and Implementation of a Standardised Clinical Decision Support Algorithm for Fever

P. O. Ana, A. E. Edim, U. J. Ekah, G. A. Inyang, F. P. Ana
{"title":"Design and Implementation of a Standardised Clinical Decision Support Algorithm for Fever","authors":"P. O. Ana, A. E. Edim, U. J. Ekah, G. A. Inyang, F. P. Ana","doi":"10.9734/air/2024/v25i41084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to design a decision support tool to assist in providing quality treatment that is consistent with World Health Organization (WHO) and Nigerian National guidelines. The system is designed to allow clinicians to administer care within their competent level working from one algorithm. The system will help them to identify emergencies associated with fever symptoms and to recommend stabilisation actions before a referral is made. This new system allows structured assessment of patients who should receive optimal care and improved data transmission to the next caregiver. In this study, we used an explanatory approach, starting with the quantitative data collection phase which is the administration of questionnaires and Pre and Post questionnaires followed by qualitative data from focus group discussions over the clinician experience using the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS). Focus group discussions were performed to authenticate the quantitative data to have a more holistic view of the CDSS. Using elements of the decision support system together with the clinician's decision showed that the clinicians felt that they worked more systematically and communicated more effectively with others. They felt more professional when using the decision support system. 73% of clinicians reported using CDSS in almost every consultation and 93% used the CDSS in the majority of their consultations during the three-month testing period. The mean total test score before the CDSS was 2.5 and this increased by the end of the test period to a mean score of 9.6, an improvement of 74.4%.  The results of this study showed that with the help of a decision support system, patients were properly identified and stabilised before they were referred, and the clinicians stayed on their competency level. It allowed caregivers to interact professionally without bias. However, the decision support system requires more extensive testing to enhance the evidence base relating to the vital parameters and the use of the decision support system.","PeriodicalId":502836,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Research","volume":"110 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/air/2024/v25i41084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to design a decision support tool to assist in providing quality treatment that is consistent with World Health Organization (WHO) and Nigerian National guidelines. The system is designed to allow clinicians to administer care within their competent level working from one algorithm. The system will help them to identify emergencies associated with fever symptoms and to recommend stabilisation actions before a referral is made. This new system allows structured assessment of patients who should receive optimal care and improved data transmission to the next caregiver. In this study, we used an explanatory approach, starting with the quantitative data collection phase which is the administration of questionnaires and Pre and Post questionnaires followed by qualitative data from focus group discussions over the clinician experience using the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS). Focus group discussions were performed to authenticate the quantitative data to have a more holistic view of the CDSS. Using elements of the decision support system together with the clinician's decision showed that the clinicians felt that they worked more systematically and communicated more effectively with others. They felt more professional when using the decision support system. 73% of clinicians reported using CDSS in almost every consultation and 93% used the CDSS in the majority of their consultations during the three-month testing period. The mean total test score before the CDSS was 2.5 and this increased by the end of the test period to a mean score of 9.6, an improvement of 74.4%.  The results of this study showed that with the help of a decision support system, patients were properly identified and stabilised before they were referred, and the clinicians stayed on their competency level. It allowed caregivers to interact professionally without bias. However, the decision support system requires more extensive testing to enhance the evidence base relating to the vital parameters and the use of the decision support system.
发热标准化临床决策支持算法的设计与实施
本研究旨在设计一种决策支持工具,以协助提供符合世界卫生组织(WHO)和尼日利亚国家指导方针的优质治疗。该系统的设计目的是让临床医生能够在其能力范围内,根据一种算法进行治疗。该系统将帮助他们识别与发热症状相关的紧急情况,并在转诊前建议采取稳定病情的措施。这一新系统可对应接受最佳护理的患者进行结构化评估,并改进向下一位护理人员的数据传输。在这项研究中,我们采用了一种解释性方法,从定量数据收集阶段开始,即发放调查问卷和前后问卷,然后通过焦点小组讨论获得定性数据,了解临床医生使用临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的经验。焦点小组讨论是为了验证定量数据,以便更全面地了解 CDSS。将决策支持系统的元素与临床医生的决定结合起来使用显示,临床医生认为他们的工作更加系统化,与他人的沟通更加有效。他们在使用决策支持系统时感到更加专业。在为期三个月的测试期间,73% 的临床医生表示几乎在每次会诊中都使用了 CDSS,93% 的临床医生在大部分会诊中都使用了 CDSS。使用 CDSS 之前,测试总分的平均值为 2.5 分,测试期结束后,总分的平均值增至 9.6 分,提高了 74.4%。 这项研究的结果表明,在决策支持系统的帮助下,病人在转诊前得到了正确的识别和稳定,临床医生也保持了自己的能力水平。该系统使护理人员能够不带偏见地进行专业互动。不过,决策支持系统还需要更广泛的测试,以加强与生命参数和决策支持系统使用相关的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信