Norm Contestation in EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

Diego Badell
{"title":"Norm Contestation in EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights","authors":"Diego Badell","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The EU considers gender equality fundamental to its identity, with Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) playing a crucial role. This article delves into the contested aspects of EU foreign policy concerning SRHR from 1997 to 2021. Through document analysis and 18 semi‐structured interviews, it discerns three phases of contestation. Between 1997 and 2017, contestation was institutionalised within the EU, and the norm was reinforced. However, from 2017 to 2020, validity contestation arose as Hungary, Poland and the United States formed an alliance opposing SRHR, resulting in their symbolic exclusion from the EU's normative community. In 2021, within a less polarised international context (with the United States returning to consensus on SRHR), Hungary and Poland reaffirmed their commitment to the EU's SRHR consensus, highlighting the resilience of the norm.","PeriodicalId":516279,"journal":{"name":"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"120 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The EU considers gender equality fundamental to its identity, with Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) playing a crucial role. This article delves into the contested aspects of EU foreign policy concerning SRHR from 1997 to 2021. Through document analysis and 18 semi‐structured interviews, it discerns three phases of contestation. Between 1997 and 2017, contestation was institutionalised within the EU, and the norm was reinforced. However, from 2017 to 2020, validity contestation arose as Hungary, Poland and the United States formed an alliance opposing SRHR, resulting in their symbolic exclusion from the EU's normative community. In 2021, within a less polarised international context (with the United States returning to consensus on SRHR), Hungary and Poland reaffirmed their commitment to the EU's SRHR consensus, highlighting the resilience of the norm.
欧盟外交政策中的规范争议:性与生殖健康和权利案例
欧盟认为性别平等是其身份的根本,而性健康和生殖健康及权利(SRHR)则发挥着至关重要的作用。本文深入探讨了 1997 年至 2021 年欧盟外交政策中有关性与生殖健康和权利的有争议的方面。通过文件分析和 18 个半结构式访谈,文章发现了三个争议阶段。在 1997 年至 2017 年期间,欧盟内部将争议制度化,规范得到加强。然而,从 2017 年到 2020 年,匈牙利、波兰和美国结成联盟,反对性健康和生殖健康及权利,导致它们被象征性地排除在欧盟的规范社区之外,从而引发了有效性的争议。2021 年,在两极分化较少的国际背景下(美国重新就性健康和生殖健康及权利达成共识),匈牙利和波兰重申其对欧盟性健康和生殖健康及权利共识的承诺,突出了该规范的复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信