A Doctrinal Approach to Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Sweden

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1017/s1574019624000178

Mikael Ruotsi

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The delegation theory of unconstitutional constitutional amendments, a limited theory of unamendability – Applying a doctrinal approach to justify unconstitutional constitutional amendments – Introducing a typology of unconstitutionality – The practical deficiencies and internal inconsistencies of the delegation theory – The limited role of the doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendments in the Swedish context – The redundancy of constituent power as a legal concept

查看原文本刊更多论文

处理违宪宪法修正案的理论方法：瑞典宪法修正案的司法审查

违宪宪法修正案的授权理论，一种有限的不可修正性理论 - 运用理论方法证明违宪宪法修正案的合理性 - 引入违宪类型学 - 授权理论的实际缺陷和内部不一致 - 在瑞典背景下违宪宪法修正案理论的有限作用 - 制宪权作为一个法律概念的冗余性

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.