Traditional vs. modified Ringer lactate-based del Nido cardioplegia impacts on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: results from a clinical trial

Naser Kachoueian, Farhad Gorjipour, Salimeh Janghorban, Majid Torkashvand, Mohammad Parsa Mahjoob, Hossein Aslani, Mohamadjavad Mehrabanian, Fazel Gorjipour
{"title":"Traditional vs. modified Ringer lactate-based del Nido cardioplegia impacts on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: results from a clinical trial","authors":"Naser Kachoueian, Farhad Gorjipour, Salimeh Janghorban, Majid Torkashvand, Mohammad Parsa Mahjoob, Hossein Aslani, Mohamadjavad Mehrabanian, Fazel Gorjipour","doi":"10.1051/ject/2024010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: myocardial protection with cardioplegia solution is one of the precautions during coronary bypass grafting surgery (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to reduce myocardial damage and ischemia/reperfusion injuries. Unfortunately, the major component of the del Nido cardioplegia solution, Plasma-Lyte A, is unreachable in Iran due to high cost. Therefore, we have utilized lactate Ringer's solution as the base solution for our modified del Nido solution (LR DN).\nStudy design and methods: the present clinical trial was performed on 18-75 year old patients (EF>35%) undergoing CABG with CPB in Imam Hossein hospital Tehran-Iran in 2021. Patients were randomly allocated to LR DN (modified del Nido cardioplegia) and PL DN (standard del Nido cardioplegia solution) groups. Serum level of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) at baseline, declamp, ICU admission, and 24 hours after admission, the type and dosage of inotrope agents, EF, rate of arrhythmia after clamp removal and lactate level were measured and compared between groups.\nResults: 109 patients were recruited. There were no statistically significant differences between the PL DN cardioplegia and LR DN groups for cardiopulmonary bypass times, cardiac enzymes, transfusion requirements, and arterial blood gases. However, postoperative serum levels of cTnI among patients in the LR DN group was significantly higher than patients of the PL DN group after ICU admission and 24 hours postoperatively. Also, more patients needed epinephrine administration in the operating room in the LR DN group (29.8% vs. 11.5%; p: 0.019 vs. PL DN group).\nConclusion: we concluded that standard del Nido cardioplegia solution offers better myocardial protection compared with Ringer's lactate-based del Nido cardioplegia in adult patients undergoing CABG with CPB. We recommend using standard del Nido cardioplegia with a base of Plasma-Lyte A for patients presenting for CABG surgery.","PeriodicalId":309024,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2024010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: myocardial protection with cardioplegia solution is one of the precautions during coronary bypass grafting surgery (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to reduce myocardial damage and ischemia/reperfusion injuries. Unfortunately, the major component of the del Nido cardioplegia solution, Plasma-Lyte A, is unreachable in Iran due to high cost. Therefore, we have utilized lactate Ringer's solution as the base solution for our modified del Nido solution (LR DN). Study design and methods: the present clinical trial was performed on 18-75 year old patients (EF>35%) undergoing CABG with CPB in Imam Hossein hospital Tehran-Iran in 2021. Patients were randomly allocated to LR DN (modified del Nido cardioplegia) and PL DN (standard del Nido cardioplegia solution) groups. Serum level of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) at baseline, declamp, ICU admission, and 24 hours after admission, the type and dosage of inotrope agents, EF, rate of arrhythmia after clamp removal and lactate level were measured and compared between groups. Results: 109 patients were recruited. There were no statistically significant differences between the PL DN cardioplegia and LR DN groups for cardiopulmonary bypass times, cardiac enzymes, transfusion requirements, and arterial blood gases. However, postoperative serum levels of cTnI among patients in the LR DN group was significantly higher than patients of the PL DN group after ICU admission and 24 hours postoperatively. Also, more patients needed epinephrine administration in the operating room in the LR DN group (29.8% vs. 11.5%; p: 0.019 vs. PL DN group). Conclusion: we concluded that standard del Nido cardioplegia solution offers better myocardial protection compared with Ringer's lactate-based del Nido cardioplegia in adult patients undergoing CABG with CPB. We recommend using standard del Nido cardioplegia with a base of Plasma-Lyte A for patients presenting for CABG surgery.
传统与改良林格乳酸盐del Nido心脏麻痹对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者临床疗效的影响:临床试验结果
导言:使用心脏麻痹溶液保护心肌是使用心肺旁路(CPB)进行冠状动脉旁路移植手术(CABG)期间的预防措施之一,以减少心肌损伤和缺血/再灌注损伤。遗憾的是,由于价格昂贵,伊朗无法获得 del Nido 心脏麻痹溶液的主要成分血浆-Lyte A。研究设计和方法:本临床试验于 2021 年在伊朗德黑兰伊玛目侯赛因医院对 18-75 岁(EF>35%)接受 CPB 的 CABG 患者进行。患者被随机分配到 LR DN(改良德尔尼多心脏麻痹液)组和 PL DN(标准德尔尼多心脏麻痹液)组。测量基线、解钳、入 ICU 和入院后 24 小时的血清心肌肌钙蛋白 I (cTnI)水平、肌力药物的类型和剂量、EF、解钳后的心律失常发生率和乳酸水平,并进行组间比较:结果:共招募了 109 名患者。在心肺旁路时间、心肌酶、输血需求和动脉血气方面,PL DN 强心剂组和 LR DN 强心剂组之间没有明显的统计学差异。然而,在进入重症监护室后和术后 24 小时内,LR DN 组患者的术后血清 cTnI 水平明显高于 PL DN 组患者。结论:我们得出结论,在使用 CPB 进行 CABG 的成人患者中,标准德尔尼多心脏麻痹溶液与基于林格乳酸盐的德尔尼多心脏麻痹相比,能提供更好的心肌保护。我们建议接受 CABG 手术的患者使用以血浆-Lyte A 为基础的标准德尔尼多心脏麻痹液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信