F. Zanlungo, Zeynep Yucel, Claudio Feliciani, K. Nishinari, Takayuki Kanda
{"title":"Congestion Number Analysis of Cross-Flow Dynamics: Experimental Data and Simulations","authors":"F. Zanlungo, Zeynep Yucel, Claudio Feliciani, K. Nishinari, Takayuki Kanda","doi":"10.17815/cd.2024.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We recently proposed the \"Congestion Number\" (CN) as a metricto evaluate the state of a pedestrian crowd. Such metric, whose definition is based on the gradient of the rotor of the crowd velocity field, appears to provide additional information with respect to traditional metrics based on pedestrian density and flow.\nWe also published two works on the dynamics of orthogonally crossing pedestrian flows under different density regimes. In the first manuscript we analysed experimental data by using traditionalobservables such as density, velocity and relative position between pedestrians, along with less explored ones such as body orientation. In the second one we proposed a hierarchy of simulation models to reproduce the cross-flow dynamics, and used the aforementioned observables to compare such models.\nBased on theoretical considerations and analysis of real world data, we believe the crossing flow setting to be a good arena to test the CN metric, and in this work we perform a CN analysis on the empirical and simulation data. Results show that simulation models, which reproduced almost perfectly the density time dependence of the pedestrian crowd, fail to reproduce the CN one. Actually, models \"outperform\" the pedestrian crowd when analysed using CN. These preliminary results suggest that the CN metric may provide useful information not only in crowd assessment but also in model evaluation.","PeriodicalId":93276,"journal":{"name":"Collective dynamics","volume":"65 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collective dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17815/cd.2024.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We recently proposed the "Congestion Number" (CN) as a metricto evaluate the state of a pedestrian crowd. Such metric, whose definition is based on the gradient of the rotor of the crowd velocity field, appears to provide additional information with respect to traditional metrics based on pedestrian density and flow.
We also published two works on the dynamics of orthogonally crossing pedestrian flows under different density regimes. In the first manuscript we analysed experimental data by using traditionalobservables such as density, velocity and relative position between pedestrians, along with less explored ones such as body orientation. In the second one we proposed a hierarchy of simulation models to reproduce the cross-flow dynamics, and used the aforementioned observables to compare such models.
Based on theoretical considerations and analysis of real world data, we believe the crossing flow setting to be a good arena to test the CN metric, and in this work we perform a CN analysis on the empirical and simulation data. Results show that simulation models, which reproduced almost perfectly the density time dependence of the pedestrian crowd, fail to reproduce the CN one. Actually, models "outperform" the pedestrian crowd when analysed using CN. These preliminary results suggest that the CN metric may provide useful information not only in crowd assessment but also in model evaluation.