How prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges: the importance of confidence, trust, and safety.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Henriette Bruun, Louise Milling, Daniel Wittrock, Søren Mikkelsen, Lotte Huniche
{"title":"How prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges: the importance of confidence, trust, and safety.","authors":"Henriette Bruun, Louise Milling, Daniel Wittrock, Søren Mikkelsen, Lotte Huniche","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01061-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethical challenges constitute an inseparable part of daily decision-making processes in all areas of healthcare. Ethical challenges are associated with moral distress that can lead to burnout. Clinical ethics support has proven useful to address and manage such challenges. This paper explores how prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges. The study is part of a larger action research project to develop and test an approach to clinical ethics support that is sensitive to the context of emergency medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We explored ethical challenges and management strategies in three focus groups, with 15 participants in total, each attended by emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and prehospital anaesthesiologists. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The approach to data analysis was systematic text condensation approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We stratified the management of ethical challenges into actions before, during, and after incidents. Before incidents, participants stressed the importance of mutual understandings, shared worldviews, and a supportive approach to managing emotions. During an incident, the participants employed moral perception, moral judgments, and moral actions. After an incident, the participants described sharing ethical challenges only to a limited extent as sharing was emotionally challenging, and not actively supported by workplace culture, or organisational procedures. The participants primarily managed ethical challenges informally, often using humour to cope.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis supports and clarifies that confidence, trust, and safety in relation to colleagues, management, and the wider organisation are essential for prehospital emergency personnel to share ethical challenges and preventing moral distress turning into burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01061-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ethical challenges constitute an inseparable part of daily decision-making processes in all areas of healthcare. Ethical challenges are associated with moral distress that can lead to burnout. Clinical ethics support has proven useful to address and manage such challenges. This paper explores how prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges. The study is part of a larger action research project to develop and test an approach to clinical ethics support that is sensitive to the context of emergency medicine.

Methods: We explored ethical challenges and management strategies in three focus groups, with 15 participants in total, each attended by emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and prehospital anaesthesiologists. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The approach to data analysis was systematic text condensation approach.

Results: We stratified the management of ethical challenges into actions before, during, and after incidents. Before incidents, participants stressed the importance of mutual understandings, shared worldviews, and a supportive approach to managing emotions. During an incident, the participants employed moral perception, moral judgments, and moral actions. After an incident, the participants described sharing ethical challenges only to a limited extent as sharing was emotionally challenging, and not actively supported by workplace culture, or organisational procedures. The participants primarily managed ethical challenges informally, often using humour to cope.

Conclusion: Our analysis supports and clarifies that confidence, trust, and safety in relation to colleagues, management, and the wider organisation are essential for prehospital emergency personnel to share ethical challenges and preventing moral distress turning into burnout.

院前急救人员如何应对伦理挑战:信心、信任和安全的重要性。
背景:伦理挑战是医疗保健各个领域日常决策过程中不可分割的一部分。伦理挑战与可能导致职业倦怠的道德困扰有关。临床伦理支持已被证明有助于应对和管理此类挑战。本文探讨了院前急救人员如何应对伦理挑战。该研究是一个更大的行动研究项目的一部分,该项目旨在开发和测试一种适合急救医学环境的临床伦理支持方法:我们在三个焦点小组中探讨了伦理挑战和管理策略,每个小组共有 15 人参加,分别由急救医疗技术人员、护理人员和院前麻醉师组成。对焦点小组进行了录音和逐字记录。数据分析方法为系统文本浓缩法:我们将伦理挑战的管理分为事前、事中和事后三个阶段。在事件发生前,参与者强调了相互理解、共同的世界观和支持性情绪管理方法的重要性。在事件发生期间,参与者运用了道德认知、道德判断和道德行动。在事件发生后,参与者仅在有限的程度上分享了道德挑战,因为分享在情绪上具有挑 战性,并且没有得到工作场所文化或组织程序的积极支持。参与者主要以非正式的方式应对道德挑战,通常使用幽默来应对:我们的分析支持并阐明了与同事、管理层和更广泛的组织相关的信心、信任和安全对于院前急救人员分享伦理挑战和防止道德困扰转化为职业倦怠至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信