Assessment of an in-house IgG ELISA targeting SARS-CoV-2 RBD: Applications in infected and vaccinated individuals

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Hernan Hermes Monteiro da Costa , Valeria Oliveira Silva , Gustavo Carvalho Amorim , Marcia Grando Guereschi , Luciana Marciano Sergio , Carlos Henrique Rodrigues Gomes , Marisa Ailin Hong , Elaine Lopes de Oliveira , Luis Fernando de Macedo Brígido , Jose Angelo Lauletta Lindoso , Carlos Roberto Prudencio
{"title":"Assessment of an in-house IgG ELISA targeting SARS-CoV-2 RBD: Applications in infected and vaccinated individuals","authors":"Hernan Hermes Monteiro da Costa ,&nbsp;Valeria Oliveira Silva ,&nbsp;Gustavo Carvalho Amorim ,&nbsp;Marcia Grando Guereschi ,&nbsp;Luciana Marciano Sergio ,&nbsp;Carlos Henrique Rodrigues Gomes ,&nbsp;Marisa Ailin Hong ,&nbsp;Elaine Lopes de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Luis Fernando de Macedo Brígido ,&nbsp;Jose Angelo Lauletta Lindoso ,&nbsp;Carlos Roberto Prudencio","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2024.113683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study evoluated an in-house Spike Receptor Binding Domain Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (RBD-IgG-ELISA) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in infected and vaccinated individuals. The assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 99.25%, and accuracy of 95.13%. Precision and reproducibility were highly consistent. The RBD-IgG-ELISA was able to detect 96.25% of Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed cases for SARS-CoV-2 infection, demonstrating positive and negative predictive values of 99,18% and 91,69%, respectively. In an epidemiological survey, ELISA, lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA), and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) exhibited diagnostic sensitivities of 68.29%, 63.41%, and 70.73%, respectively, along with specificities of 82.93%, 80.49%, and 80.49%, respectively. Agreement between RBD-IgG-ELISA/PCR was moderate (k index 0.512). However, good agreement between different assays (RBD-IgG-ELISA/LFIA k index 0.875, RBD-IgG-ELISA/ECLIA k index 0.901). Test performance on individuals' samples were inferior due to seroconversion time and chronicity. The IgG-RBD-ELISA assay demonstrated its effectiveness in monitoring antibody levels among healthcare professionals, revealing significant differences both before and after the administration of the third vaccine dose, with heightened protection levels observed following the third dose in five Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine regimens. In conclusion, the RBD-IgG-ELISA exhibits high reproducibility, specificity, and sensitivity, making it a suitable assay validated for serosurveillance and for obtaining information about COVID-19 infections or vaccinations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":"530 ","pages":"Article 113683"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175924000681","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evoluated an in-house Spike Receptor Binding Domain Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (RBD-IgG-ELISA) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in infected and vaccinated individuals. The assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 99.25%, and accuracy of 95.13%. Precision and reproducibility were highly consistent. The RBD-IgG-ELISA was able to detect 96.25% of Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed cases for SARS-CoV-2 infection, demonstrating positive and negative predictive values of 99,18% and 91,69%, respectively. In an epidemiological survey, ELISA, lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA), and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) exhibited diagnostic sensitivities of 68.29%, 63.41%, and 70.73%, respectively, along with specificities of 82.93%, 80.49%, and 80.49%, respectively. Agreement between RBD-IgG-ELISA/PCR was moderate (k index 0.512). However, good agreement between different assays (RBD-IgG-ELISA/LFIA k index 0.875, RBD-IgG-ELISA/ECLIA k index 0.901). Test performance on individuals' samples were inferior due to seroconversion time and chronicity. The IgG-RBD-ELISA assay demonstrated its effectiveness in monitoring antibody levels among healthcare professionals, revealing significant differences both before and after the administration of the third vaccine dose, with heightened protection levels observed following the third dose in five Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine regimens. In conclusion, the RBD-IgG-ELISA exhibits high reproducibility, specificity, and sensitivity, making it a suitable assay validated for serosurveillance and for obtaining information about COVID-19 infections or vaccinations.

评估针对 SARS-CoV-2 RBD 的内部 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试验:在感染者和疫苗接种者中的应用。
该研究旨在评估一种用于检测感染者和疫苗接种者体内 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 抗体的内部尖峰受体结合域酶联免疫吸附试验(RBD-ELISA)。使用 RBD 重组蛋白,该测定的灵敏度为 91%,特异性为 99.25%,准确性为 95.13%。精确度和再现性高度一致。在聚合酶链反应(PCR)确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 感染病例中,RBD-IgG-ELISA 能够检测出 96.25%的病例,阳性预测值为 99.18%,阴性预测值为 91.69%。在一项流行病学调查中,ELISA、侧流免疫层析(LFIA)和电化学发光免疫测定(ECLIA)的诊断灵敏度分别为 68.29%、63.41% 和 70.73%,特异性分别为 82.93%、80.49% 和 80.49%。RBD-IgG-ELISA/PCR 之间的一致性一般(k 指数为 0.512)。然而,不同检测方法之间的一致性良好(RBD-IgG ELISA/LFIA k 指数为 0.875,RBD-IgG ELISA/ECLIA k 指数为 0.901)。由于血清转换时间和慢性化,个人样本的检测结果较差。IgG-RBD-ELISA测定证明了它在监测医疗保健专业人员抗体水平方面的有效性,显示了接种第三剂疫苗前后的显著差异,在五种冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗接种方案中,接种第三剂疫苗后的保护水平都有所提高。总之,RBD-IgG ELISA 具有很高的可重复性、特异性和灵敏度,适合用于血清监测和获取有关 COVID-19 感染或疫苗接种的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信