How can we reward you? A compliance and reward ontology (CaRO) for eliciting quantitative reward rules for engagement in mHealth app and healthy behaviors
IF 4 2区 医学Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
{"title":"How can we reward you? A compliance and reward ontology (CaRO) for eliciting quantitative reward rules for engagement in mHealth app and healthy behaviors","authors":"Mor Peleg , Nicole Veggiotti , Lucia Sacchi , Szymon Wilk","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>When developing mHealth apps with point reward systems, knowledge engineers and domain experts should define app requirements capturing quantitative reward patterns that reflect patient compliance with health behaviors. This is a difficult task, and they could be aided by an ontology that defines systematically quantitative behavior goals that address more than merely the recommended behavior but also rewards for partial compliance or practicing the behavior more than recommended. No ontology and algorithm exist for defining point rewards systematically.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed an OWL ontology for point rewards that leverages the Basic Formal Ontology, the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology and the Gamification Domain Ontology. This Compliance and Reward Ontology (CaRO) allows defining temporal elementary reward patterns for single and multiple sessions of practicing a behavior. These could be assembled to define more complex temporal patterns for persistence behavior over longer time intervals as well as logical combinations of simpler reward patterns. We also developed an algorithm for calculating the points that should be rewarded to users, given data regarding their actual performance. A natural language generation algorithm generates from ontology instances app requirements in the form of user stories. To assess the usefulness of the ontology and algorithms, information system students who are trained to be system analysts/knowledge engineers evaluated whether the ontology and algorithms can improve the requirement elicitation of point rewards for compliance patterns more completely and correctly.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For single-session rewards, the ontology improved formulation of two of the six requirements as well as the total time for specifying them. For multi-session rewards, the ontology improved formulation of five of the 11 requirements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CaRO is a first attempt of its kind, and it covers all of the cases of compliance and reward pattern definitions that were needed for a full-scale system that was developed as part of a large European project. The ontology and algorithm are available at <span>https://github.com/capable-project/rewards.</span><svg><path></path></svg></p></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 104655"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153204642400073X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
When developing mHealth apps with point reward systems, knowledge engineers and domain experts should define app requirements capturing quantitative reward patterns that reflect patient compliance with health behaviors. This is a difficult task, and they could be aided by an ontology that defines systematically quantitative behavior goals that address more than merely the recommended behavior but also rewards for partial compliance or practicing the behavior more than recommended. No ontology and algorithm exist for defining point rewards systematically.
Methods
We developed an OWL ontology for point rewards that leverages the Basic Formal Ontology, the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology and the Gamification Domain Ontology. This Compliance and Reward Ontology (CaRO) allows defining temporal elementary reward patterns for single and multiple sessions of practicing a behavior. These could be assembled to define more complex temporal patterns for persistence behavior over longer time intervals as well as logical combinations of simpler reward patterns. We also developed an algorithm for calculating the points that should be rewarded to users, given data regarding their actual performance. A natural language generation algorithm generates from ontology instances app requirements in the form of user stories. To assess the usefulness of the ontology and algorithms, information system students who are trained to be system analysts/knowledge engineers evaluated whether the ontology and algorithms can improve the requirement elicitation of point rewards for compliance patterns more completely and correctly.
Results
For single-session rewards, the ontology improved formulation of two of the six requirements as well as the total time for specifying them. For multi-session rewards, the ontology improved formulation of five of the 11 requirements.
Conclusion
CaRO is a first attempt of its kind, and it covers all of the cases of compliance and reward pattern definitions that were needed for a full-scale system that was developed as part of a large European project. The ontology and algorithm are available at https://github.com/capable-project/rewards.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.