Long-term frequent fire and cattle grazing alter dry forest understory vegetation

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Becky K. Kerns, Michelle A. Day
{"title":"Long-term frequent fire and cattle grazing alter dry forest understory vegetation","authors":"Becky K. Kerns,&nbsp;Michelle A. Day","doi":"10.1002/eap.2972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding fire and large herbivore interactions in interior western forests is critical, owing to the extensive and widespread co-occurrence of these two disturbance types and multiple present and future implications for forest resilience, conservation and restoration. However, manipulative studies focused on interactions and outcomes associated with these two disturbances are rare in forested rangelands. We investigated understory vegetation response to 5-year spring and fall prescribed fire and domestic cattle grazing exclusion in ponderosa pine stands and reported long-term responses, almost two decades after the first entry fires. In fall burn areas open to cattle grazing, total understory cover prior to utilization was about 12% lower compared with fall burn areas where cattle were experimentally excluded. This response was not strongly driven by a particular palatable or unpalatable plant functional group. Fire and grazing are likely interacting in a numerically mediated process, as we found little evidence to support a functionally moderated pathway. Post-fire green-up may equalize forage to a certain extent and concentrate herbivores in the smaller burned areas within pastures, constraining a positive understory response to burning. Fall fire and grazing also increased annual forbs and resprouting shrubs. The effects of spring burning were relatively minor, and we found no interaction with grazing. The nonnative annual grass <i>Bromus tectorum</i> (cheatgrass) remains a problematic invader linked to fall burning but not grazing in stands that had higher propagule pressure when the experiment was initiated. At these sites, exotic grass was a major component of the vegetation by 2015, and invasion was also increasing in spring burn and unburned areas. Information from our study suggests that frequent fall fires and cattle grazing combined may reduce understory resilience in similar dry ponderosa pine forests. Consideration of longer fire return intervals, resting areas after fire, virtual fencing, or burning entire pastures may help to mitigate the effects noted in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding fire and large herbivore interactions in interior western forests is critical, owing to the extensive and widespread co-occurrence of these two disturbance types and multiple present and future implications for forest resilience, conservation and restoration. However, manipulative studies focused on interactions and outcomes associated with these two disturbances are rare in forested rangelands. We investigated understory vegetation response to 5-year spring and fall prescribed fire and domestic cattle grazing exclusion in ponderosa pine stands and reported long-term responses, almost two decades after the first entry fires. In fall burn areas open to cattle grazing, total understory cover prior to utilization was about 12% lower compared with fall burn areas where cattle were experimentally excluded. This response was not strongly driven by a particular palatable or unpalatable plant functional group. Fire and grazing are likely interacting in a numerically mediated process, as we found little evidence to support a functionally moderated pathway. Post-fire green-up may equalize forage to a certain extent and concentrate herbivores in the smaller burned areas within pastures, constraining a positive understory response to burning. Fall fire and grazing also increased annual forbs and resprouting shrubs. The effects of spring burning were relatively minor, and we found no interaction with grazing. The nonnative annual grass Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) remains a problematic invader linked to fall burning but not grazing in stands that had higher propagule pressure when the experiment was initiated. At these sites, exotic grass was a major component of the vegetation by 2015, and invasion was also increasing in spring burn and unburned areas. Information from our study suggests that frequent fall fires and cattle grazing combined may reduce understory resilience in similar dry ponderosa pine forests. Consideration of longer fire return intervals, resting areas after fire, virtual fencing, or burning entire pastures may help to mitigate the effects noted in this study.

长期频繁的火灾和放牧改变了干旱森林的林下植被。
了解西部内陆森林中火灾与大型食草动物之间的相互作用至关重要,因为这两种干扰类型广泛存在,而且对森林的恢复能力、保护和恢复具有多方面的现实和未来影响。然而,在森林牧场中,侧重于与这两种干扰相关的相互作用和结果的操纵性研究却很少见。我们在松柏林中调查了林下植被对为期 5 年的春季和秋季规定火灾以及家畜放牧排斥的反应,并报告了首次进入火灾近 20 年后的长期反应。在开放放牧的秋季焚烧区,与实验性禁牛的秋季焚烧区相比,利用前的林下植被总覆盖度降低了约 12%。这种反应并不是由特定的适口或不适口植物功能群强烈驱动的。火灾和放牧很可能是以数量为媒介的相互作用过程,因为我们几乎没有发现证据支持以功能为媒介的途径。火灾后的植被恢复可能会在一定程度上均衡牧草,并使食草动物集中在牧场内较小的烧毁区域,从而限制了林下植物对火灾的积极反应。秋季的火烧和放牧也增加了一年生草本植物和重生灌木。春季焚烧的影响相对较小,而且我们没有发现与放牧的交互作用。在试验开始时繁殖压力较高的林分中,非本地一年生草 Bromus tectorum(欺骗草)仍然是一种与秋季燃烧而非放牧有关的问题入侵者。在这些地点,外来草到 2015 年已成为植被的主要组成部分,在春季焚烧和未焚烧地区的入侵也在增加。我们的研究结果表明,频繁的秋季火灾和放牧可能会降低类似干旱松柏林的林下恢复力。考虑延长火灾复燃间隔、火后休息区、虚拟围栏或烧毁整个牧场可能有助于减轻本研究中注意到的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信