Ask-Tell-Ask with Bidirectional Feedback Improves Feedback Culture

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joseph A. Dayaa, Milza Howard, Winston Li, Dana Doctor
{"title":"Ask-Tell-Ask with Bidirectional Feedback Improves Feedback Culture","authors":"Joseph A. Dayaa,&nbsp;Milza Howard,&nbsp;Winston Li,&nbsp;Dana Doctor","doi":"10.1007/s40596-024-01980-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The authors sought to assess whether an Ask-Tell-Ask feedback model augmented with bidirectional feedback improves perception of feedback.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Implementation occurred on an inpatient psychiatry unit at University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospitals from July 2022 to June 2023 among attending and resident physicians and medical students. Attending physicians were educated on the Ask-Tell-Ask model and encouraged to hold weekly bidirectional feedback sessions with trainees. Surveys containing scales and free-text response were distributed by email before and after rotations to assess perception of feedback: if feedback was clearly stated, occurred on a predictable basis, included actionable goals, and fostered bidirectional feedback with attendings. For statistical analysis, survey responses were assigned numerical values of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Differences between mean numerical correlates of responses from pre-rotation and post-rotation surveys were analyzed with unpaired <i>t</i>-tests; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Authors independently developed themes from free-text responses, which were consolidated with themes developed by all authors.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean ratings to survey items universally improved following the intervention; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001 and statistically significant. Pre-rotation, feedback culture was described as constrained, fraught, non-actionable, inconsistent, improving, and hierarchical. Post-rotation, the feedback culture within the UNC Department of Psychiatry was described as constructive, consistent, improving, strength-based, approachable, and nonhierarchical.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An Ask-Tell-Ask feedback model with an added emphasis on giving and receiving feedback significantly improves perception of feedback and feedback culture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40596-024-01980-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The authors sought to assess whether an Ask-Tell-Ask feedback model augmented with bidirectional feedback improves perception of feedback.

Methods

Implementation occurred on an inpatient psychiatry unit at University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospitals from July 2022 to June 2023 among attending and resident physicians and medical students. Attending physicians were educated on the Ask-Tell-Ask model and encouraged to hold weekly bidirectional feedback sessions with trainees. Surveys containing scales and free-text response were distributed by email before and after rotations to assess perception of feedback: if feedback was clearly stated, occurred on a predictable basis, included actionable goals, and fostered bidirectional feedback with attendings. For statistical analysis, survey responses were assigned numerical values of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Differences between mean numerical correlates of responses from pre-rotation and post-rotation surveys were analyzed with unpaired t-tests; p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Authors independently developed themes from free-text responses, which were consolidated with themes developed by all authors.

Results

Mean ratings to survey items universally improved following the intervention; all p < 0.0001 and statistically significant. Pre-rotation, feedback culture was described as constrained, fraught, non-actionable, inconsistent, improving, and hierarchical. Post-rotation, the feedback culture within the UNC Department of Psychiatry was described as constructive, consistent, improving, strength-based, approachable, and nonhierarchical.

Conclusions

An Ask-Tell-Ask feedback model with an added emphasis on giving and receiving feedback significantly improves perception of feedback and feedback culture.

双向反馈的 "问-答-问 "改进了反馈文化。
目的作者试图评估 "问-说-问 "反馈模式与双向反馈相结合是否能改善反馈感知:方法:2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 6 月,在北卡罗来纳大学(UNC)医院的精神病科住院部,对主治医师、住院医师和医学生实施了这一反馈模式。主治医师接受了 "问-说-问 "模式的教育,并被鼓励每周与受训者举行双向反馈会议。在轮转前后,通过电子邮件分发了包含量表和自由文本回复的调查问卷,以评估对反馈的看法:反馈是否表达清晰、是否在可预测的基础上进行、是否包含可操作的目标,以及是否促进了与主治医师的双向反馈。为了进行统计分析,调查回复被赋予了 1(非常不同意)到 5(非常同意)的数值。轮转前和轮转后调查回答的平均数值相关性差异采用非配对 t 检验进行分析;P 结果:干预后,对调查项目的平均评分普遍提高;所有 p 结论:在 "问-说-问 "反馈模式中增加了对给予和接受反馈的强调,可显著改善对反馈和反馈文化的认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy. The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信