The case against routine outcome monitoring

IF 1.2 4区心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY

Clinical Psychologist Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1080/13284207.2024.2347648

Matteo Zuccala

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practice of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) – that is, monitoring clinical outcomes using standardized measures at regular intervals – is becoming increasingly ubiquitous for everyday practiti...

查看原文本刊更多论文

反对常规结果监测的理由

常规结果监测 (ROM) - 即定期使用标准化测量方法监测临床结果 - 在日常实践中越来越普遍。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

6.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychologist is the journal of the Australian Psychological Society’s College of Clinical Psychologists. The journal is international in scope, with an aim to keep abreast of local and international developments in the field of clinical psychology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles across a range of topics of broad general relevance to clinical psychologists working in clinical and health settings, including assessment and treatment of psychopathology, and issues relevant to training in clinical psychology. An important aim of Clinical Psychologist is to bridge the gap between clinical research and clinical practice by ensuring timely dissemination of high quality peer-reviewed articles. Clinical Psychologist publishes state of the art reviews, research papers, brief reports, and clinical case studies. The journal occasionally publishes special issues, guest edited by specialists, devoted to a single topic.