Minding the Gap: Tools for Trust Engineering of Artificial Intelligence

IF 0.7 Q4 ERGONOMICS

Ergonomics in Design Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1177/10648046241249903

Stephen L. Dorton, Jeff C. Stanley

引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing consensus and appreciation for the importance of trust in the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies; however, there is a reliance on principles-based frameworks. Recent research has highlighted the principles/practice gap, where principles alone are not actionable, and may not be wholly effective in developing more trustworthy AI. We argue for complementary, evidence-based tools to close the principles/practice gap, and present ELATE (Evidence-Based List of Exploratory Questions for AI Trust Engineering) as one such resource. We discuss several tools or approaches for making ELATE actionable within the context of systems development.

查看原文本刊更多论文

弥合差距：人工智能信任工程工具

信任在人工智能（AI）技术开发中的重要性日益得到共识和重视；然而，人们对基于原则的框架存在依赖。最近的研究凸显了原则/实践之间的差距，在这种情况下，仅有原则是不可行的，在开发更值得信赖的人工智能方面也不一定完全有效。我们主张使用基于证据的补充工具来缩小原则/实践差距，并提出了 ELATE（人工智能信任工程探索性问题证据清单）作为这样一种资源。我们将讨论几种工具或方法，使 ELATE 在系统开发中具有可操作性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Ergonomics in Design ERGONOMICS-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications is intended to serve the needs of practicing human factors/ergonomics professionals who are concerned with the usability of products, systems, tools, and environments. It provides up-to-date demonstrations of the importance of HF/E principles in design and implementation. Articles, case studies, anecdotes, debates, and interviews focus on the way in which HF/E research and methods are applied in the design, development, prototyping, test and evaluation, training, and manufacturing processes of a product or system.