Is Popliteus Tendon a Redundant Structure in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Vikash Kapoor, Ashish Raj, Anirban Chatterjee, Kaustav Debnath
{"title":"Is Popliteus Tendon a Redundant Structure in Total Knee Arthroplasty?","authors":"Vikash Kapoor, Ashish Raj, Anirban Chatterjee, Kaustav Debnath","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01173-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Many studies have shown that injury to the popliteus tendon has little consequence for the static stability of the knee following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, very few studies have evaluated the effect of intraoperative iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury on the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following TKA. This study aimed to determine the incidence of iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury in our subset of the population and to find out its effect on PROMs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>100 consecutive osteoarthritic varus knees with flexion deformities less than 20° were operated upon by a single senior experienced arthroplasty surgeon. Patients were assessed intraoperatively for any iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury, the injury site, and the amount of injury which was quantified and graded. PROMs applied for assessment at 1-year follow-up were Knee Society Score (KSS 1), Knee Function Score (KSS 2), and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>17% of cases had an iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury. Thirteen had grade II injuries, whereas four had grade III injuries. There was no statistical significance in post-operative knee mobility and PROMs among those with popliteus tendon injury versus non-injured patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The incidence of iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury is higher than what we expected. The tendon injury remains a risk, but it is unclear how the popliteus tendon injury will affect patients after the TKA. In our series, such an injury during knee replacement does not affect the functioning of the knee in the short term; however, a long-term follow-up is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01173-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Many studies have shown that injury to the popliteus tendon has little consequence for the static stability of the knee following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, very few studies have evaluated the effect of intraoperative iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury on the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following TKA. This study aimed to determine the incidence of iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury in our subset of the population and to find out its effect on PROMs.

Methods

100 consecutive osteoarthritic varus knees with flexion deformities less than 20° were operated upon by a single senior experienced arthroplasty surgeon. Patients were assessed intraoperatively for any iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury, the injury site, and the amount of injury which was quantified and graded. PROMs applied for assessment at 1-year follow-up were Knee Society Score (KSS 1), Knee Function Score (KSS 2), and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

Results

17% of cases had an iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury. Thirteen had grade II injuries, whereas four had grade III injuries. There was no statistical significance in post-operative knee mobility and PROMs among those with popliteus tendon injury versus non-injured patients.

Conclusion

The incidence of iatrogenic popliteus tendon injury is higher than what we expected. The tendon injury remains a risk, but it is unclear how the popliteus tendon injury will affect patients after the TKA. In our series, such an injury during knee replacement does not affect the functioning of the knee in the short term; however, a long-term follow-up is warranted.

Abstract Image

腘绳肌腱是全膝关节置换术中的多余结构吗?
背景许多研究表明,腘绳肌腱损伤对全膝关节置换术(TKA)后膝关节的静态稳定性影响不大。然而,很少有研究评估术中先天性腘绳肌腱损伤对 TKA 术后患者报告结果(PROMs)的影响。本研究旨在确定腘绳肌肌腱先天性损伤在我们的亚组人群中的发生率,并找出其对PROMs的影响。方法 100例屈曲畸形小于20°的连续骨关节炎膝关节外翻患者由一名经验丰富的资深关节置换外科医生进行手术。术中评估患者是否存在先天性腘绳肌腱损伤、损伤部位和损伤程度,并进行量化和分级。随访1年时的评估采用的PROMs包括膝关节社会评分(KSS 1)、膝关节功能评分(KSS 2)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)。其中 13 例为 II 级损伤,4 例为 III 级损伤。有腘绳肌肌腱损伤的患者与没有损伤的患者在术后膝关节活动度和PROMs方面没有统计学意义。肌腱损伤仍然存在风险,但腘绳肌肌腱损伤对 TKA 术后患者的影响尚不清楚。在我们的系列研究中,膝关节置换术中的这种损伤在短期内不会影响膝关节的功能,但需要进行长期随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信