The association between myasthenia gravis and risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Osteoporosis International Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1007/s00198-024-07097-2
Chien-Ju Lin, Yu-Shan Lee, Jiann-Horng Yeh, Shu-Jung Liu, Kuan-Yu Lin
{"title":"The association between myasthenia gravis and risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chien-Ju Lin, Yu-Shan Lee, Jiann-Horng Yeh, Shu-Jung Liu, Kuan-Yu Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00198-024-07097-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), because of their muscle weakness and exposure to corticosteroids treatment, are generally considered to be at increased risk for osteoporosis or fracture. However, clinical evidence of this issue is lacking. In this review, we systematically searched databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Airiti library from inception to the end of November 2023 for cohort studies that compared participants with MG and participants without MG for incidence of osteoporosis or fracture. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. In total, we included 3 studies with 34,865 participants. The pooled meta-analysis using the random effect model demonstrated no significant difference in risk of fracture in the MG group (odds ratio = 1.52; 95% confidence interval = 0.74 to 3.12; I<sup>2</sup> = 93%; between-study variance [τ<sup>2</sup>] = 0.32) compared with that for the non-MG group. Due to limited studies, we could not perform a quantitative analysis for risk of osteoporosis. In conclusion, we found no robust evidence to support the proposition that patients with MG are at higher risk for fracture than general comparators. The explanations and underlying mechanisms of this finding remain unclear, we therefore conclude that additional studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19638,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis International","volume":" ","pages":"1709-1717"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07097-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), because of their muscle weakness and exposure to corticosteroids treatment, are generally considered to be at increased risk for osteoporosis or fracture. However, clinical evidence of this issue is lacking. In this review, we systematically searched databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Airiti library from inception to the end of November 2023 for cohort studies that compared participants with MG and participants without MG for incidence of osteoporosis or fracture. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. In total, we included 3 studies with 34,865 participants. The pooled meta-analysis using the random effect model demonstrated no significant difference in risk of fracture in the MG group (odds ratio = 1.52; 95% confidence interval = 0.74 to 3.12; I2 = 93%; between-study variance [τ2] = 0.32) compared with that for the non-MG group. Due to limited studies, we could not perform a quantitative analysis for risk of osteoporosis. In conclusion, we found no robust evidence to support the proposition that patients with MG are at higher risk for fracture than general comparators. The explanations and underlying mechanisms of this finding remain unclear, we therefore conclude that additional studies are warranted.

Abstract Image

重症肌无力与骨折风险之间的关系:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
肌无力症(MG)患者由于肌肉无力和接受皮质类固醇治疗,通常被认为骨质疏松症或骨折的风险会增加。然而,有关这一问题的临床证据却很缺乏。在本综述中,我们系统地检索了从开始到 2023 年 11 月底的 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Embase 和 Airiti 图书馆等数据库,以寻找比较 MG 患者和非 MG 患者骨质疏松症或骨折发生率的队列研究。我们采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估。我们共纳入了 3 项研究,34865 名参与者。使用随机效应模型进行的汇总荟萃分析表明,与非 MG 组相比,MG 组的骨折风险无显著差异(几率比 = 1.52;95% 置信区间 = 0.74 至 3.12;I2 = 93%;研究间方差 [τ2] = 0.32)。由于研究有限,我们无法对骨质疏松症的风险进行定量分析。总之,我们没有发现有力的证据支持 MG 患者的骨折风险高于一般比较者的观点。这一结论的解释和内在机制仍不清楚,因此我们认为有必要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoporosis International
Osteoporosis International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An international multi-disciplinary journal which is a joint initiative between the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, Osteoporosis International provides a forum for the communication and exchange of current ideas concerning the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. It publishes: original papers - reporting progress and results in all areas of osteoporosis and its related fields; review articles - reflecting the present state of knowledge in special areas of summarizing limited themes in which discussion has led to clearly defined conclusions; educational articles - giving information on the progress of a topic of particular interest; case reports - of uncommon or interesting presentations of the condition. While focusing on clinical research, the Journal will also accept submissions on more basic aspects of research, where they are considered by the editors to be relevant to the human disease spectrum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信