Sequential free fibula transfers: Quality of life and systematic review

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1002/micr.31184
Robin T. Wu MD, Jennifer An-Jou Lin MD, Charlie Chun-Lin Su MD, Fu-Chan Wei MD, FACS
{"title":"Sequential free fibula transfers: Quality of life and systematic review","authors":"Robin T. Wu MD,&nbsp;Jennifer An-Jou Lin MD,&nbsp;Charlie Chun-Lin Su MD,&nbsp;Fu-Chan Wei MD, FACS","doi":"10.1002/micr.31184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Successive osteoseptocutaneous fibula transfers for jaws reconstruction are rare but important options. This study contributes patient-reported and clinical outcomes, as well as systematically reviews all existing reports.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>All sequential fibula transfers performed by the senior author were reviewed from a prospectively managed database, including University of Washington quality of life (UWQoL). Systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane databases for similar publications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen patients (average age 51.5 years) received sequential fibulas (mean 4.7 years between reconstructions). Secondary fibulas more often had benign indications (72.2% vs. 33.3%, <i>p</i> = .04), most commonly osteoradionecrosis (38.9%). At a mean follow-up of 30.5 months, the average interincisal distance increased from 21.8 to 27.6 mm, and 92.3% tolerated an oral diet following the second fibula.</p>\n \n <p>Eight patients completed the UW-QoL before and after the second fibula, and three prior to the first fibula. Composite physical function was significantly decreased from 96.7 prefibula reconstruction to 63.3 following the first (<i>p</i> &lt; .001) and 64.2 after the second fibula (<i>p</i> &lt; .001). There were no differences in other domains.</p>\n \n <p>The systematic review yielded six articles reporting 56 patients (mean 39 months between fibulas). Secondary fibulas were performed for repeat malignancy (45%) and osteoreadionecrosis (39%), resulting in elevated tube feeding from 20% following the first to 39% following the second, but overall high quality of life in two studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Sequential osteoseptocutaneous fibula reconstructions of jaws are often performed for benign indications such as osteoradionecrosis. Overall function and QoL are comparable with those following the first fibula transfer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Successive osteoseptocutaneous fibula transfers for jaws reconstruction are rare but important options. This study contributes patient-reported and clinical outcomes, as well as systematically reviews all existing reports.

Methods

All sequential fibula transfers performed by the senior author were reviewed from a prospectively managed database, including University of Washington quality of life (UWQoL). Systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane databases for similar publications.

Results

Eighteen patients (average age 51.5 years) received sequential fibulas (mean 4.7 years between reconstructions). Secondary fibulas more often had benign indications (72.2% vs. 33.3%, p = .04), most commonly osteoradionecrosis (38.9%). At a mean follow-up of 30.5 months, the average interincisal distance increased from 21.8 to 27.6 mm, and 92.3% tolerated an oral diet following the second fibula.

Eight patients completed the UW-QoL before and after the second fibula, and three prior to the first fibula. Composite physical function was significantly decreased from 96.7 prefibula reconstruction to 63.3 following the first (p < .001) and 64.2 after the second fibula (p < .001). There were no differences in other domains.

The systematic review yielded six articles reporting 56 patients (mean 39 months between fibulas). Secondary fibulas were performed for repeat malignancy (45%) and osteoreadionecrosis (39%), resulting in elevated tube feeding from 20% following the first to 39% following the second, but overall high quality of life in two studies.

Conclusions

Sequential osteoseptocutaneous fibula reconstructions of jaws are often performed for benign indications such as osteoradionecrosis. Overall function and QoL are comparable with those following the first fibula transfer.

连续游离腓骨转移:生活质量和系统回顾。
背景:连续的骨皮下腓骨转移用于颌骨重建是一种罕见但重要的选择。本研究提供了患者报告和临床结果,并系统回顾了所有现有报告:方法:对资深作者进行的所有腓骨连续转移术进行了回顾,包括华盛顿大学生活质量(UWQoL)前瞻性管理数据库。在 PubMed 和 Cochrane 数据库中对类似出版物进行了系统回顾:18名患者(平均年龄51.5岁)接受了连续腓骨重建(重建间隔平均为4.7年)。二次腓骨多为良性适应症(72.2% vs. 33.3%,p = .04),最常见的是骨软化症(38.9%)。在平均 30.5 个月的随访中,患者的平均颌间距离从 21.8 mm 增加到 27.6 mm,92.3% 的患者在接受第二根腓骨治疗后可以口服饮食。8 名患者在第二根腓骨手术前后完成了 UW-QoL 测评,3 名患者在第一根腓骨手术前完成了 UW-QoL 测评。综合身体功能从腓骨重建前的96.7明显降低到第一根腓骨重建后的63.3(p 结论:腓骨重建后的综合身体功能明显降低:针对骨软化症等良性适应症,通常会对颌骨进行顺序性骨骺腓骨重建。整体功能和生活质量与首次腓骨移植后相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信