The Effect of Different Chemical Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of Resin-Matrix Ceramic Repaired with Resin Composite.

Q1 Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1785531
Satit Prabriputaloong, Nantawan Krajangta, Awiruth Klaisiri
{"title":"The Effect of Different Chemical Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of Resin-Matrix Ceramic Repaired with Resin Composite.","authors":"Satit Prabriputaloong, Nantawan Krajangta, Awiruth Klaisiri","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1785531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study investigates the effect of different chemical surface treatment protocols with different functional monomers of universal adhesives on the shear bond strength between resin-matrix ceramic and resin composite.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> Eighty resin-matrix ceramics (Shofu block HC) were built and designed into eight groups of ten specimens and surface treated with HC primer (HC) and/or three universal adhesives (single bond universal [SBU], Scotchbond universal plus [SBP], and Tetric N-bond universal [TNU]) assigning follows; group 1, nonsurface treated; group 2, HC; group 3, SBU; group 4, HC + SBU; group 5, SBP; group 6, HC + SBP; group 7, TNU; group 8, HC + TNU. A template was put on the specimen center, and then pushed packable resin composite. Mechanical testing machinery was used to examine the samples' shear bond strength (SBS) values. To examine failure patterns, the debonded specimen surfaces were examined by a stereomicroscope.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong> The one-way analysis of variance method was used to evaluate the data, and the Tukey's test was used to determine the significant level (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The highest SBS was obtained in group 6 (39.25 ± 1.65 MPa). Group 1 (4.15 ± 0.54 MPa) had the lowest SBS. Group 6 exhibited the highest percentage of cohesive failure patterns (70%). High SBS values were frequently correlated with the surface treatment groups and the cohesive failure patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The application of HC primer prior to the universal adhesive is an alternative protocol for enhancing the repair bond strength between resin-matrix ceramic and resin composite interfaces. Moreover, the application of HC primer prior to the SBP is the best strategy for resin-matrix ceramic and resin composite repairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"165-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1785531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  This study investigates the effect of different chemical surface treatment protocols with different functional monomers of universal adhesives on the shear bond strength between resin-matrix ceramic and resin composite.

Materials and methods:  Eighty resin-matrix ceramics (Shofu block HC) were built and designed into eight groups of ten specimens and surface treated with HC primer (HC) and/or three universal adhesives (single bond universal [SBU], Scotchbond universal plus [SBP], and Tetric N-bond universal [TNU]) assigning follows; group 1, nonsurface treated; group 2, HC; group 3, SBU; group 4, HC + SBU; group 5, SBP; group 6, HC + SBP; group 7, TNU; group 8, HC + TNU. A template was put on the specimen center, and then pushed packable resin composite. Mechanical testing machinery was used to examine the samples' shear bond strength (SBS) values. To examine failure patterns, the debonded specimen surfaces were examined by a stereomicroscope.

Statistical analysis:  The one-way analysis of variance method was used to evaluate the data, and the Tukey's test was used to determine the significant level (p < 0.05).

Results:  The highest SBS was obtained in group 6 (39.25 ± 1.65 MPa). Group 1 (4.15 ± 0.54 MPa) had the lowest SBS. Group 6 exhibited the highest percentage of cohesive failure patterns (70%). High SBS values were frequently correlated with the surface treatment groups and the cohesive failure patterns.

Conclusion:  The application of HC primer prior to the universal adhesive is an alternative protocol for enhancing the repair bond strength between resin-matrix ceramic and resin composite interfaces. Moreover, the application of HC primer prior to the SBP is the best strategy for resin-matrix ceramic and resin composite repairs.

不同化学表面处理对用树脂复合材料修复的树脂基质陶瓷粘接强度的影响
目的:本研究探讨了通用粘合剂不同功能单体的不同化学表面处理方案对树脂基质陶瓷和树脂复合材料之间剪切粘接强度的影响:本研究探讨了不同功能单体通用粘合剂的不同化学表面处理方案对树脂基陶瓷和树脂复合材料之间剪切粘接强度的影响:制作八十个树脂基陶瓷(Shofu block HC)并将其设计为八组,每组十个试样,然后用 HC 底漆(HC)和/或三种通用粘合剂(single bond universal [SBU]、Scotchbond universal plus [SBP]和 Tetric N-bond universal [TNU])进行表面处理,分配如下;第 1 组,未进行表面处理;第 2 组,HC;第 3 组,SBU;第 4 组,HC + SBU;第 5 组,SBP;第 6 组,HC + SBP;第 7 组,TNU;第 8 组,HC + TNU。在试样中心放置模板,然后推入可包装树脂复合材料。使用机械测试设备检测试样的剪切粘接强度(SBS)值。统计分析采用单因素方差分析法:统计分析:采用单因素方差分析法评估数据,并用 Tukey 检验确定显著性水平(p 结果:第 6 组的 SBS 值最高,第 7 组的 SBS 值最低,第 8 组的 SBS 值最高,第 9 组的 SBS 值最低:第 6 组的 SBS 最高(39.25 ± 1.65 兆帕)。第 1 组的 SBS 最低(4.15 ± 0.54 兆帕)。第 6 组的内聚破坏模式比例最高(70%)。高 SBS 值经常与表面处理组别和内聚破坏模式相关:结论:在使用通用粘合剂之前使用碳氢化合物底漆是提高树脂基质陶瓷和树脂复合材料界面之间修复粘接强度的一种替代方案。此外,在使用 SBP 之前使用 HC 底漆是树脂-基质陶瓷和树脂复合材料修复的最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信