Redefining cerebellar assessment: A comprehensive review of the cerebellum's cognitive and affective roles and the efficacy of CCAS scales.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-04-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_226_2024
Albert Alan, Michelle Ennabe, Muath Alsarafandi, Noor Malik, Edward R Laws, Martin Weinand
{"title":"Redefining cerebellar assessment: A comprehensive review of the cerebellum's cognitive and affective roles and the efficacy of CCAS scales.","authors":"Albert Alan, Michelle Ennabe, Muath Alsarafandi, Noor Malik, Edward R Laws, Martin Weinand","doi":"10.25259/SNI_226_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging research expands our understanding of the cerebellum beyond motor control to include cognitive, emotional, and autonomic functions. This review examines the cerebellum's complex role, spotlighting Schmahmann's syndrome, or cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS), which impairs executive functions, language, and spatial processing. It emphasizes advancements in diagnosing CCAS and the imperative of developing superior diagnostic tools for managing cerebellar pathologies effectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed using databases such as PubMed, OVID Embase, and OVID Medline. Using the keywords \"cerebellar cognitive, affective syndrome\" and \"Schmahmann syndrome,\" the search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines for systemic review, in which the selection process narrowed down an initial set of 54 articles to 12, focusing on the impact of the CCAS scale on diagnosing and understanding Schmahmann's syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review's analysis confirms the cerebellum's roles in motor and cognitive functions and underscores the CCAS scale as a significant advancement in detecting cerebellar deficits, surpassing traditional assessments such as the mini-mental state examination and Montreal cognitive assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review emphasizes the importance of understanding the cerebellum's involvement in cognition and emotion and the crucial role of the CCAS scale for identifying cerebellar impairments. It calls for better diagnostic tools to assess CCAS accurately and suggests enhancing the CCAS Scale to reflect cultural and educational diversity. This will improve the diagnosis and treatment of cerebellar disorders, promoting a comprehensive neurological perspective on the cerebellum's functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_226_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emerging research expands our understanding of the cerebellum beyond motor control to include cognitive, emotional, and autonomic functions. This review examines the cerebellum's complex role, spotlighting Schmahmann's syndrome, or cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS), which impairs executive functions, language, and spatial processing. It emphasizes advancements in diagnosing CCAS and the imperative of developing superior diagnostic tools for managing cerebellar pathologies effectively.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using databases such as PubMed, OVID Embase, and OVID Medline. Using the keywords "cerebellar cognitive, affective syndrome" and "Schmahmann syndrome," the search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines for systemic review, in which the selection process narrowed down an initial set of 54 articles to 12, focusing on the impact of the CCAS scale on diagnosing and understanding Schmahmann's syndrome.

Results: The review's analysis confirms the cerebellum's roles in motor and cognitive functions and underscores the CCAS scale as a significant advancement in detecting cerebellar deficits, surpassing traditional assessments such as the mini-mental state examination and Montreal cognitive assessment.

Conclusion: This review emphasizes the importance of understanding the cerebellum's involvement in cognition and emotion and the crucial role of the CCAS scale for identifying cerebellar impairments. It calls for better diagnostic tools to assess CCAS accurately and suggests enhancing the CCAS Scale to reflect cultural and educational diversity. This will improve the diagnosis and treatment of cerebellar disorders, promoting a comprehensive neurological perspective on the cerebellum's functions.

重新定义小脑评估:全面回顾小脑的认知和情感作用以及 CCAS 量表的功效。
背景:新近的研究拓展了我们对小脑的认识,使其不仅限于运动控制,还包括认知、情感和自主神经功能。这篇综述探讨了小脑的复杂作用,重点介绍了影响执行功能、语言和空间处理能力的施马曼综合征或小脑认知情感综合征(CCAS)。报告强调了在诊断CCAS方面取得的进展,以及开发优质诊断工具以有效控制小脑病变的必要性:使用 PubMed、OVID Embase 和 OVID Medline 等数据库进行了全面的文献检索。使用关键词 "小脑认知、情感综合征 "和 "Schmahmann综合征",按照《2020年系统综述和Meta分析首选报告项目》的系统综述指南进行检索,在筛选过程中将最初的54篇文章缩小到12篇,重点关注CCAS量表对诊断和理解Schmahmann综合征的影响:结果:综述分析证实了小脑在运动和认知功能中的作用,并强调CCAS量表在检测小脑功能缺陷方面取得了重大进展,超越了小型精神状态检查和蒙特利尔认知评估等传统评估方法:本综述强调了了解小脑参与认知和情感的重要性,以及CCAS量表在识别小脑功能障碍方面的关键作用。它呼吁使用更好的诊断工具来准确评估 CCAS,并建议加强 CCAS 量表以反映文化和教育的多样性。这将改善小脑疾病的诊断和治疗,促进从全面的神经学角度看待小脑的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信