Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction in a Referral Center in Northern Israel.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Israel Medical Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-01
Rabea Haddad, Edo Birati, Hiba Zayyad, Nizar Andria, Eyal Nachum, Erez Kachel, Ibrahim Marai
{"title":"Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction in a Referral Center in Northern Israel.","authors":"Rabea Haddad, Edo Birati, Hiba Zayyad, Nizar Andria, Eyal Nachum, Erez Kachel, Ibrahim Marai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasingly being used; thus, there is an increasing need for transvenous lead extraction (TLE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize our experience with TLE at single referral center in northern Israel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included all patients who underwent TLE at our center between 2019 and 2022, regardless of the indication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 50 patients. The mean age was 69 ± 10.36 years; 78% were males. A total of 99 electrodes were targeted. The mean number of electrodes was 1.96 (range 1-4) per patient. The time between lead implantation and extraction ranged between 1.1 and 34 years with an average of 8.14 ± 5.71 years (median of 7.5 years). Complete lead removal was achieved in 98% of patients and in 98.99% of leads. The complete procedural success rate as well as the clinical procedural success rate was 96%. The procedural failure rate was 4% (1 patient died 2 days after the index procedure and 1 patient remained with large portion of lead). The indication for TLE was infection in 78% of the cohort group. Powered mechanical sheaths were used in 36 patients (72%), laser sheaths in 27 (54%), and a combination of laser and mechanical sheaths in 16 (32%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical and procedural success rates of TLE, primarily for CEID-related infection, were high. A combination of laser and mechanical sheaths was needed in one-third of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50268,"journal":{"name":"Israel Medical Association Journal","volume":"26 5","pages":"273-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasingly being used; thus, there is an increasing need for transvenous lead extraction (TLE).

Objectives: To summarize our experience with TLE at single referral center in northern Israel.

Methods: The study included all patients who underwent TLE at our center between 2019 and 2022, regardless of the indication.

Results: The cohort included 50 patients. The mean age was 69 ± 10.36 years; 78% were males. A total of 99 electrodes were targeted. The mean number of electrodes was 1.96 (range 1-4) per patient. The time between lead implantation and extraction ranged between 1.1 and 34 years with an average of 8.14 ± 5.71 years (median of 7.5 years). Complete lead removal was achieved in 98% of patients and in 98.99% of leads. The complete procedural success rate as well as the clinical procedural success rate was 96%. The procedural failure rate was 4% (1 patient died 2 days after the index procedure and 1 patient remained with large portion of lead). The indication for TLE was infection in 78% of the cohort group. Powered mechanical sheaths were used in 36 patients (72%), laser sheaths in 27 (54%), and a combination of laser and mechanical sheaths in 16 (32%).

Conclusions: The clinical and procedural success rates of TLE, primarily for CEID-related infection, were high. A combination of laser and mechanical sheaths was needed in one-third of patients.

以色列北部一家转诊中心的经静脉抽取铅结果。
背景:心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)的使用越来越广泛,因此,经静脉导联取出术(TLE)的需求也越来越大:总结以色列北部单一转诊中心的 TLE 经验:研究包括 2019 年至 2022 年期间在本中心接受 TLE 的所有患者,无论其适应症如何:结果:共纳入 50 名患者。平均年龄为 69 ± 10.36 岁,78% 为男性。共针对 99 个电极。每位患者的平均电极数为 1.96 个(1-4 个不等)。从导联植入到取出的时间为 1.1 至 34 年,平均为 8.14 ± 5.71 年(中位数为 7.5 年)。98%的患者和98.99%的导联实现了完全取出。完全手术成功率和临床手术成功率均为 96%。手术失败率为 4%(1 名患者在索引手术后 2 天死亡,1 名患者残留大部分导联)。78%的队列中,TLE的适应症是感染。36名患者(72%)使用了动力机械鞘,27名患者(54%)使用了激光鞘,16名患者(32%)结合使用了激光和机械鞘:结论:TLE的临床和手术成功率很高,主要用于治疗CEID相关感染。结论:主要针对 CEID 相关感染的 TLE 临床和手术成功率很高,三分之一的患者需要同时使用激光和机械鞘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Israel Medical Association Journal
Israel Medical Association Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), representing medical sciences and medicine in Israel, is published in English by the Israel Medical Association. The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) was initiated in 1999.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信