Validation and Cultural Adaptation of Persian Version of Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Q4 Medicine
Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-01-08 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.31138/mjr.130723.pvm
Elham Aflaki, Faezeh Sehatpour, Sheida Banihashemi
{"title":"Validation and Cultural Adaptation of Persian Version of Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.","authors":"Elham Aflaki, Faezeh Sehatpour, Sheida Banihashemi","doi":"10.31138/mjr.130723.pvm","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multidimensional disease. In addition to quantitative factors, qualitative factors play an important role in the progress and outcome of the diseases. One of the most effective methods of collecting qualitative information is questionnaires reported by patients. The data obtained from the questionnaires are as important as the clinical criteria. Multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) is one of the latest questionnaires that provide useful information in a short time.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the reliability and validity of the Persian form of MDAHAQ for the use of Iranian patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two groups of participants were selected for this study. The validity test group included 110 patients, and the reliability test group included 140 patients. Translation and adaption of MDHAQ were performed by using Guillemin guidelines. The reliability was tested by using test-retest and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Persian version of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) was used for assessing the criterion validity. The correlation between the MDHAQ score and Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and the Persian version of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) was evaluated using the Spearman coefficient. Discriminant validity was tested in groups of patients based on two varied disease activities based on CDAI and DAS28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test-retest with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) gave a coefficient of 0.865(95% CI: 0.809, 0.904) for physical function and 0.786(95% CI: 0.698, 0.848) for psychological items. Cronbach's alpha was 0.885 and 0.705 for physical function and psychological dimensions respectively. The Persian version of the MDHAQ had a good to strong correlation with the Persian version of the HAQ (ranging from 0.604 to 0.962) and also with CDAI (ranging from 0.616 to 0.838) and a moderate correlation with DAS28 (ranging from 0.415 to 0.439).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian form of MDHAQ is a reliable and valid instrument for the routine evaluation of RA patients in rheumatology clinics in Iranian RA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":32816,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"83-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11082758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.130723.pvm","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multidimensional disease. In addition to quantitative factors, qualitative factors play an important role in the progress and outcome of the diseases. One of the most effective methods of collecting qualitative information is questionnaires reported by patients. The data obtained from the questionnaires are as important as the clinical criteria. Multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) is one of the latest questionnaires that provide useful information in a short time.

Objectives: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Persian form of MDAHAQ for the use of Iranian patients.

Method: Two groups of participants were selected for this study. The validity test group included 110 patients, and the reliability test group included 140 patients. Translation and adaption of MDHAQ were performed by using Guillemin guidelines. The reliability was tested by using test-retest and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Persian version of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) was used for assessing the criterion validity. The correlation between the MDHAQ score and Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and the Persian version of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) was evaluated using the Spearman coefficient. Discriminant validity was tested in groups of patients based on two varied disease activities based on CDAI and DAS28.

Results: Test-retest with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) gave a coefficient of 0.865(95% CI: 0.809, 0.904) for physical function and 0.786(95% CI: 0.698, 0.848) for psychological items. Cronbach's alpha was 0.885 and 0.705 for physical function and psychological dimensions respectively. The Persian version of the MDHAQ had a good to strong correlation with the Persian version of the HAQ (ranging from 0.604 to 0.962) and also with CDAI (ranging from 0.616 to 0.838) and a moderate correlation with DAS28 (ranging from 0.415 to 0.439).

Conclusion: The Persian form of MDHAQ is a reliable and valid instrument for the routine evaluation of RA patients in rheumatology clinics in Iranian RA patients.

类风湿关节炎患者波斯语版多维健康评估问卷的验证与文化适应性研究
背景:类风湿性关节炎(RA)是一种多维疾病。除定量因素外,定性因素在疾病的进展和结果中也起着重要作用。收集定性信息的最有效方法之一是患者报告的调查问卷。从问卷中获得的数据与临床标准同样重要。多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)是最新的问卷之一,能在短时间内提供有用的信息:目的:研究适用于伊朗患者的多维健康评估问卷(MDAHAQ)波斯语版的可靠性和有效性:方法:本研究选择了两组参与者。有效性测试组包括 110 名患者,可靠性测试组包括 140 名患者。MDHAQ 的翻译和改编采用 Guillemin 指南。可靠性测试采用重复测试和克朗巴赫α进行内部一致性检验。波斯语版健康评估问卷(HAQ)用于评估标准效度。使用斯皮尔曼系数评估了 MDHAQ 得分与疾病活动评分-28(DAS28)、临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)和波斯语版健康评估问卷(HAQ)之间的相关性。在基于 CDAI 和 DAS28 的两种不同疾病活动的患者组中测试了判别效度:使用类内相关系数(ICC)进行的重测显示,身体功能和心理项目的相关系数分别为 0.865(95% CI:0.809, 0.904)和 0.786(95% CI:0.698, 0.848)。身体功能和心理维度的 Cronbach's alpha 分别为 0.885 和 0.705。MDHAQ波斯语版与HAQ波斯语版(0.604-0.962)和CDAI(0.616-0.838)有良好到较强的相关性,与DAS28(0.415-0.439)有中等程度的相关性:结论:MDHAQ波斯语版是一种可靠有效的工具,可用于伊朗风湿病诊所对RA患者进行常规评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信