Comparing stimulus preference and response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication with auditory stimulation

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Jennifer L. Cook, Rasha R. Baruni, Jonathan W. Pinkston, John T. Rapp, Raymond G. Miltenberger, Shreeya Deshmukh, Emma Walker, Sharayah Tai
{"title":"Comparing stimulus preference and response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication with auditory stimulation","authors":"Jennifer L. Cook,&nbsp;Rasha R. Baruni,&nbsp;Jonathan W. Pinkston,&nbsp;John T. Rapp,&nbsp;Raymond G. Miltenberger,&nbsp;Shreeya Deshmukh,&nbsp;Emma Walker,&nbsp;Sharayah Tai","doi":"10.1002/jeab.915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined a conjugate approach for evaluating auditory stimulus preference for 81 participants using force as a continuous response dimension. First, the researchers used a verbal preference assessment to evaluate each participant's preference for listening to five genres of music. This process identified high-preference and low-preference music for each participant. Thereafter, the researchers exposed each participant to the five music genres in a randomized order while using a hand dynamometer to measure their response force to increase the auditory clarity of the music. The results indicate (a) 63% of the participants' high-preference music genres corresponded to the genre for which they exerted the highest mean force and (b) most participants' low-preference music genres corresponded to the genre for which they exerted the lowest mean force. These findings are consistent with those from Davis et al. (2021) and further support using conjugate preparations for measuring the relative value of some stimulus events.</p>","PeriodicalId":17411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","volume":"122 1","pages":"11-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeab.915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined a conjugate approach for evaluating auditory stimulus preference for 81 participants using force as a continuous response dimension. First, the researchers used a verbal preference assessment to evaluate each participant's preference for listening to five genres of music. This process identified high-preference and low-preference music for each participant. Thereafter, the researchers exposed each participant to the five music genres in a randomized order while using a hand dynamometer to measure their response force to increase the auditory clarity of the music. The results indicate (a) 63% of the participants' high-preference music genres corresponded to the genre for which they exerted the highest mean force and (b) most participants' low-preference music genres corresponded to the genre for which they exerted the lowest mean force. These findings are consistent with those from Davis et al. (2021) and further support using conjugate preparations for measuring the relative value of some stimulus events.

比较共轭制备中的刺激偏好和反应力:听觉刺激的重复。
本研究采用一种共轭方法,以力作为连续反应维度,对 81 名参与者的听觉刺激偏好进行评估。首先,研究人员使用口头偏好评估来评价每位参与者对聆听五种音乐类型的偏好。这一过程确定了每位参与者对音乐的高偏好度和低偏好度。之后,研究人员按照随机顺序让每位受试者聆听五种类型的音乐,同时使用手部测力计测量他们的反应力,以提高音乐的听觉清晰度。结果表明:(a) 63% 的参与者的高偏好音乐类型与他们平均用力最大的音乐类型相对应;(b) 大多数参与者的低偏好音乐类型与他们平均用力最小的音乐类型相对应。这些发现与 Davis 等人(2021 年)的研究结果一致,并进一步支持使用共轭准备来测量某些刺激事件的相对价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior is primarily for the original publication of experiments relevant to the behavior of individual organisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信