In silico modelling of stroke volume, cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance in cardiovascular safety pharmacology studies by telemetry

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pascal Champeroux , Jérôme Thireau , Jean-Yves Le Guennec , Raafat Fares
{"title":"In silico modelling of stroke volume, cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance in cardiovascular safety pharmacology studies by telemetry","authors":"Pascal Champeroux ,&nbsp;Jérôme Thireau ,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Le Guennec ,&nbsp;Raafat Fares","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2024.107512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The principle of proportionality of the systolic area of the central aortic pressure to stroke volume (SV) has been long known. The aim of the present work was to evaluate an in silico solution derived from this principle for modelling SV (iSV model) in cardiovascular safety pharmacology studies by telemetry. Blood pressure was measured in the abdominal aorta in accordance with standard practice. Central aortic pressure was modelled from the abdominal aortic pressure waveform using the N-point moving average (NPMA) method for beat-to-beat estimation of SV. First, the iSV was compared to the SV measured by ultrasonic flowmetry in the ascending aorta (uSV) after various pharmacological challenges in beagle dogs anaesthetised with etomidate/fentanyl. The iSV showed minimal bias (0.2 mL i.e. 2%) and excellent agreement with uSV. Then, previous telemetry studies including reference vasoactive and inotropic compounds were retrospectively reanalysed to model drug effects on stroke volume (iSV), cardiac output (iCO) and systemic vascular resistance (iSVR). Among them, the examples of nicardipine and isoprenaline highlight risks of erroneous or biased estimation of drug effects from the abdominal aortic pressure due to pulse pressure amplification. Furthermore, the examples of verapamil, quinidine and moxifloxacin show that iSV, iCO and iSVR are earlier biomarkers than blood pressure itself for predicting drug effect on blood pressure. This in silico modelling approach included in vivo telemetry safety pharmacology studies can be considered as a New Approach Methodology (NAM) that provides valuable additional information and contribute to improving non-clinical translational research to the clinic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 107512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871924000224/pdfft?md5=191927eb65dacbf511c1a7be6e86d5ab&pid=1-s2.0-S1056871924000224-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871924000224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The principle of proportionality of the systolic area of the central aortic pressure to stroke volume (SV) has been long known. The aim of the present work was to evaluate an in silico solution derived from this principle for modelling SV (iSV model) in cardiovascular safety pharmacology studies by telemetry. Blood pressure was measured in the abdominal aorta in accordance with standard practice. Central aortic pressure was modelled from the abdominal aortic pressure waveform using the N-point moving average (NPMA) method for beat-to-beat estimation of SV. First, the iSV was compared to the SV measured by ultrasonic flowmetry in the ascending aorta (uSV) after various pharmacological challenges in beagle dogs anaesthetised with etomidate/fentanyl. The iSV showed minimal bias (0.2 mL i.e. 2%) and excellent agreement with uSV. Then, previous telemetry studies including reference vasoactive and inotropic compounds were retrospectively reanalysed to model drug effects on stroke volume (iSV), cardiac output (iCO) and systemic vascular resistance (iSVR). Among them, the examples of nicardipine and isoprenaline highlight risks of erroneous or biased estimation of drug effects from the abdominal aortic pressure due to pulse pressure amplification. Furthermore, the examples of verapamil, quinidine and moxifloxacin show that iSV, iCO and iSVR are earlier biomarkers than blood pressure itself for predicting drug effect on blood pressure. This in silico modelling approach included in vivo telemetry safety pharmacology studies can be considered as a New Approach Methodology (NAM) that provides valuable additional information and contribute to improving non-clinical translational research to the clinic.

通过遥测技术对心血管安全药理学研究中的每搏容量、心输出量和全身血管阻力进行硅建模。
中心主动脉压力的收缩面积与每搏量(SV)成正比的原理由来已久。本研究的目的是评估在心血管安全性药理学研究中通过遥测建立 SV 模型(iSV 模型)的硅学解决方案。按照标准做法测量腹主动脉血压。使用 N 点移动平均(NPMA)法根据腹主动脉压力波形建立中心主动脉压力模型,以逐次估计 SV。首先,对使用依托咪酯/芬太尼麻醉的小猎犬进行各种药理挑战后,将 iSV 与升主动脉超声流量计测量的 SV(uSV)进行比较。iSV 显示的偏差极小(0.2 mL,即 2%),与 uSV 的一致性极佳。然后,对以前的遥测研究(包括参考血管活性和肌力化合物)进行了回顾性重新分析,以模拟药物对每搏容量(iSV)、心输出量(iCO)和全身血管阻力(iSVR)的影响。其中,尼卡地平和异丙肾上腺素的例子突出表明,由于脉压放大,从腹主动脉压估算药物效应存在错误或偏差的风险。此外,维拉帕米、奎尼丁和莫西沙星的例子表明,在预测药物对血压的影响方面,iSV、iCO 和 iSVR 是比血压本身更早的生物标志物。这种包含体内遥测安全药理学研究的硅学建模方法可被视为一种新方法(NAM),可提供有价值的额外信息,有助于改进从非临床转化到临床的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信