Relative Performance of Volume of Distribution Prediction Methods for Lipophilic Drugs with Uncertainty in LogP Value.

Abstract

Purpose: The goal was to assess, for lipophilic drugs, the impact of logP on human volume of distribution at steady-state (VD_ss) predictions, including intermediate fut and Kp values, from six methods: Oie-Tozer, Rodgers-Rowland (tissue-specific Kp and only muscle Kp), GastroPlus, Korzekwa-Nagar, and TCM-New.

Method: A sensitivity analysis with focus on logP was conducted by keeping pKa and fup constant for each of four drugs, while varying logP. VD_ss was also calculated for the specific literature logP values. Error prediction analysis was conducted by analyzing prediction errors by source of logP values, drug, and overall values.

Results: The Rodgers-Rowland methods were highly sensitive to logP values, followed by GastroPlus and Korzekwa-Nagar. The Oie-Tozer and TCM-New methods were only modestly sensitive to logP. Hence, the relative performance of these methods depended upon the source of logP value. As logP values increased, TCM-New and Oie-Tozer were the most accurate methods. TCM-New was the only method that was accurate regardless of logP value source. Oie-Tozer provided accurate predictions for griseofulvin, posaconazole, and isavuconazole; GastroPlus for itraconazole and isavuconazole; Korzekwa-Nagar for posaconazole; and TCM-New for griseofulvin, posaconazole, and isavuconazole. Both Rodgers-Rowland methods provided inaccurate predictions due to the overprediction of VD_ss.

Conclusions: TCM-New was the most accurate prediction of human VD_ss across four drugs and three logP sources, followed by Oie-Tozer. TCM-New showed to be the best method for VD_ss prediction of highly lipophilic drugs, suggesting BPR as a favorable surrogate for drug partitioning in the tissues, and which avoids the use of fup.