Social Support Network and Sedentary Behavior Among US Adults With and Without Mobility Impairment.

IF 2.5 4区医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1177/08901171241252526

Jessie N Stapleton, M Ryan Richardson

{"title":"Social Support Network and Sedentary Behavior Among US Adults With and Without Mobility Impairment.","authors":"Jessie N Stapleton, M Ryan Richardson","doi":"10.1177/08901171241252526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Evidence suggests that sedentary behavior is increased among those with mobility impairment, but the evidence examining the impact of social support networks (SSN) on this relationship remains limited. This study examines the relationship between SSN and sedentary behavior among adults with and without mobility impairment.Design: Cross-sectional.Setting: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2008.Subjects: U.S. adults (≥40 years of age) with (n = 962) and without (n = 1393) mobility impairment.Measures: The Social Support Network (SSN) score was created using self-reported emotional, financial, church, friends, and marital support/status. The dependent variable in this study was the upper quartile of sedentary time in minutes.Results: Both higher SSN score (AOR .43; 95% CI 0.25-.76, P = .045) and poverty to income ratio (PIR) (AOR 2.60; 95% CI 1.40-4.82, P = .01) were significant predictors of increased sedentary time among adults with mobility impairment. Among adults without mobility impairment, higher PIR was the only significant predictor of increased sedentary time (OR 3.59; 95% Cl 1.80-7.15, P < .0001).Conclusion: Higher SSN score was associated with significantly lower odds of increased sedentary time among adults with mobility impairment. A similar relationship was not revealed among adults without mobility impairment. Higher PIR was associated with significantly higher odds of increased sedentary time among adults with and without mobility impairment.","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"1014-1017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241252526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence suggests that sedentary behavior is increased among those with mobility impairment, but the evidence examining the impact of social support networks (SSN) on this relationship remains limited. This study examines the relationship between SSN and sedentary behavior among adults with and without mobility impairment.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2008.

Subjects: U.S. adults (≥40 years of age) with (n = 962) and without (n = 1393) mobility impairment.

Measures: The Social Support Network (SSN) score was created using self-reported emotional, financial, church, friends, and marital support/status. The dependent variable in this study was the upper quartile of sedentary time in minutes.

Results: Both higher SSN score (AOR .43; 95% CI 0.25-.76, P = .045) and poverty to income ratio (PIR) (AOR 2.60; 95% CI 1.40-4.82, P = .01) were significant predictors of increased sedentary time among adults with mobility impairment. Among adults without mobility impairment, higher PIR was the only significant predictor of increased sedentary time (OR 3.59; 95% Cl 1.80-7.15, P < .0001).

Conclusion: Higher SSN score was associated with significantly lower odds of increased sedentary time among adults with mobility impairment. A similar relationship was not revealed among adults without mobility impairment. Higher PIR was associated with significantly higher odds of increased sedentary time among adults with and without mobility impairment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

美国行动不便和行动不便成年人的社会支持网络与久坐行为。

目的：有证据表明，行动不便者的久坐行为会增加，但研究社会支持网络（SSN）对这种关系的影响的证据仍然有限。本研究探讨了社会支持网络与行动不便和行动不便成年人的久坐行为之间的关系：设计：横断面：研究对象：美国成年人（≥ ñ ñ）：美国成年人（≥40 岁）中有行动障碍者（962 人）和无行动障碍者（1393 人）：社会支持网络（SSN）得分是根据自我报告的情感、经济、教会、朋友和婚姻支持/状况得出的。本研究的因变量是以分钟为单位的久坐时间的上四分位数：结果：较高的 SSN 分数（AOR 0.43；95% CI 0.25-.76，P = 0.045）和贫困与收入比（PIR）（AOR 2.60；95% CI 1.40-4.82，P = 0.01）均可显著预测行动不便成年人久坐时间的增加。在没有行动障碍的成年人中，较高的 PIR 是久坐时间增加的唯一显著预测因素（OR 3.59; 95% Cl 1.80-7.15, P < .0001）：结论：在行动不便的成年人中，SSN得分越高，久坐时间增加的几率就越低。在没有行动障碍的成年人中，没有发现类似的关系。在有行动障碍和无行动障碍的成年人中，PIR 越高，久坐时间增加的几率就越大。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

3.70%

发文量

184

期刊介绍： The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.