Regenerated Cellulosic Fibres Blended with Cotton to Enhance the Performance and Comfort Properties of Single Jersey Spandex Knitted Fabrics: A Sustainable Approach

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES
Aamer Khan, Muhammad Mohsin, Haji Qutab, Umar Abdullah, Muhammad Awais, Komal Iftikhar
{"title":"Regenerated Cellulosic Fibres Blended with Cotton to Enhance the Performance and Comfort Properties of Single Jersey Spandex Knitted Fabrics: A Sustainable Approach","authors":"Aamer Khan, Muhammad Mohsin, Haji Qutab, Umar Abdullah, Muhammad Awais, Komal Iftikhar","doi":"10.1007/s12221-024-00568-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Low production rate than demand and non-sustainability of cotton growth emphasise the world for its substitution. Regenerated cellulosic fibres (RCFs) are the best replacement options in terms of sustainability and performance properties. In this research, we compared the regenerated fibres and cotton fibres blended yarns and single jersey spandex knitted fabrics based on those yarns with 100% cotton yarns and single jersey spandex knitted fabrics and tried to single out the most suitable regenerated/ cotton fibre blend option as the best replacement for cotton fibre in terms of performance and comfort properties along with sustainability. 30/1 Nec yarns were produced by blending cotton with lyocell, modal and Viscose Rayon fibres in (60:40) weight ratios. Single jersey knitted fabrics with 20 denier (20 D) spandex filaments were developed from the said yarns and compared with 100% cotton-based knitted fabrics. Performance properties of yarns such as strength, uniformity and hairiness and fabric properties such as skewness, bursting strength, and pilling along with some comfort properties, e.g. flexural rigidity, air permeability and vertical wicking were also evaluated. RCF-blended yarns and fabrics exhibited improved performance and comfort properties as compared to 100% cotton yarns and fabrics, especially cotton/lyocell-blended yarns and fabrics. The cotton/lyocell (60:40)-blended yarns exhibited 16% higher strength, 36% better yarn performance and 13% less hairiness when compared to 100% cotton. Similarly, the fabrics of the cotton/lyocell (60:40) blend exhibited 32% less spirality, 25% more bursting strength, twice as much airflow and five times higher moisture flow with comparable flexural rigidity as compared to the 100% cotton fabric.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":557,"journal":{"name":"Fibers and Polymers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fibers and Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-024-00568-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low production rate than demand and non-sustainability of cotton growth emphasise the world for its substitution. Regenerated cellulosic fibres (RCFs) are the best replacement options in terms of sustainability and performance properties. In this research, we compared the regenerated fibres and cotton fibres blended yarns and single jersey spandex knitted fabrics based on those yarns with 100% cotton yarns and single jersey spandex knitted fabrics and tried to single out the most suitable regenerated/ cotton fibre blend option as the best replacement for cotton fibre in terms of performance and comfort properties along with sustainability. 30/1 Nec yarns were produced by blending cotton with lyocell, modal and Viscose Rayon fibres in (60:40) weight ratios. Single jersey knitted fabrics with 20 denier (20 D) spandex filaments were developed from the said yarns and compared with 100% cotton-based knitted fabrics. Performance properties of yarns such as strength, uniformity and hairiness and fabric properties such as skewness, bursting strength, and pilling along with some comfort properties, e.g. flexural rigidity, air permeability and vertical wicking were also evaluated. RCF-blended yarns and fabrics exhibited improved performance and comfort properties as compared to 100% cotton yarns and fabrics, especially cotton/lyocell-blended yarns and fabrics. The cotton/lyocell (60:40)-blended yarns exhibited 16% higher strength, 36% better yarn performance and 13% less hairiness when compared to 100% cotton. Similarly, the fabrics of the cotton/lyocell (60:40) blend exhibited 32% less spirality, 25% more bursting strength, twice as much airflow and five times higher moisture flow with comparable flexural rigidity as compared to the 100% cotton fabric.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

再生纤维素纤维与棉混纺以提高单面氨纶针织物的性能和舒适性:一种可持续的方法
棉花产量低、供不应求,以及棉花增长的不可持续性,凸显了世界对棉花替代品的需求。就可持续性和性能特性而言,再生纤维素纤维(RCF)是最佳的替代选择。在这项研究中,我们将再生纤维和棉纤维混纺纱线以及基于这些纱线的单面氨纶针织面料与 100% 棉纱线和单面氨纶针织面料进行了比较,试图找出最合适的再生纤维/棉纤维混纺方案,作为棉纤维在性能、舒适性和可持续性方面的最佳替代品。通过将棉纤维与莱赛尔纤维、莫代尔纤维和粘胶人造丝纤维按(60:40)重量比混纺,生产出 30/1 Nec 纱线。用上述纱线开发出了带有 20 旦(20D)氨纶长丝的单面针织物,并与 100%棉基针织物进行了比较。此外,还评估了纱线的强度、均匀度和毛羽等性能特性,以及织物的斜度、爆破强度和起球等特性,还有一些舒适特性,如弯曲刚度、透气性和垂直排汗性。与 100% 纯棉纱线和织物相比,RCF 混纺纱线和织物的性能和舒适性都有所提高,尤其是棉/芳纶混纺纱线和织物。与 100% 棉相比,棉/离聚纤维(60:40)混纺纱线的强力提高了 16%,纱线性能提高了 36%,毛羽减少了 13%。同样,与 100% 棉织物相比,棉/纤维素(60:40)混纺织物的螺旋度降低了 32%,爆破强度提高了 25%,空气流动性提高了两倍,湿气流动性提高了五倍,挠曲刚性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fibers and Polymers
Fibers and Polymers 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
267
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: -Chemistry of Fiber Materials, Polymer Reactions and Synthesis- Physical Properties of Fibers, Polymer Blends and Composites- Fiber Spinning and Textile Processing, Polymer Physics, Morphology- Colorants and Dyeing, Polymer Analysis and Characterization- Chemical Aftertreatment of Textiles, Polymer Processing and Rheology- Textile and Apparel Science, Functional Polymers
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信