Integrity assessment of shale gas wells in Changning Block based on hierarchical analysis method

IF 2.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Luo Wei, Chenlong Fu, Wenzhe Li, Yanzhe Gao, Lixue Guo, Yangyang Liu, Fuyuan Liang, Aoyin Jia, Quanying Guo
{"title":"Integrity assessment of shale gas wells in Changning Block based on hierarchical analysis method","authors":"Luo Wei, Chenlong Fu, Wenzhe Li, Yanzhe Gao, Lixue Guo, Yangyang Liu, Fuyuan Liang, Aoyin Jia, Quanying Guo","doi":"10.1007/s13202-024-01806-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The integrity of shale gas wells is crucial in ensuring safety and efficiency throughout the development process. Such integrity spans the entire process of drilling and fracturing horizontal wells and is an essential indicator for ensuring safe and stable production throughout the lifespan of the well. This study investigates methods for assessing the integrity of shale gas wells by employing the analytic hierarchy process combined with experimental data to establish evaluation criteria and weights. The assessment is carried out specifically on shale gas wells in Changning Block. Results indicate that the integrity of these shale gas wells is influenced by various factors, such as drilling and fracturing processes. Moreover, the integrity assessment of indicators such as oil layer casing/technical casing, liquid carrying capacity, and tube column deformation is relatively low, indicating a need for enhanced monitoring and management. The comprehensive evaluation results indicate that, overall, the integrity rating of shale gas wells is generally considered “common,” but some potential safety hazards still remain that require timely attention and resolution. Case analysis reveals varying levels of integrity risks in shale gas wells. Case 1’s score of 93.51 warrants attention but is still deemed generally safe. However, Case 2’s score of 73.89 indicates a disaster level, emphasizing urgent intervention needs. Critical factors such as pressure, cementation quality, and corrosion demand proactive management for safe, sustainable operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01806-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integrity of shale gas wells is crucial in ensuring safety and efficiency throughout the development process. Such integrity spans the entire process of drilling and fracturing horizontal wells and is an essential indicator for ensuring safe and stable production throughout the lifespan of the well. This study investigates methods for assessing the integrity of shale gas wells by employing the analytic hierarchy process combined with experimental data to establish evaluation criteria and weights. The assessment is carried out specifically on shale gas wells in Changning Block. Results indicate that the integrity of these shale gas wells is influenced by various factors, such as drilling and fracturing processes. Moreover, the integrity assessment of indicators such as oil layer casing/technical casing, liquid carrying capacity, and tube column deformation is relatively low, indicating a need for enhanced monitoring and management. The comprehensive evaluation results indicate that, overall, the integrity rating of shale gas wells is generally considered “common,” but some potential safety hazards still remain that require timely attention and resolution. Case analysis reveals varying levels of integrity risks in shale gas wells. Case 1’s score of 93.51 warrants attention but is still deemed generally safe. However, Case 2’s score of 73.89 indicates a disaster level, emphasizing urgent intervention needs. Critical factors such as pressure, cementation quality, and corrosion demand proactive management for safe, sustainable operations.

Abstract Image

基于层次分析法的长宁区块页岩气井完整性评估
页岩气井的完整性对于确保整个开发过程的安全和效率至关重要。这种完整性贯穿水平井钻井和压裂的整个过程,是确保油井在整个生命周期内安全稳定生产的重要指标。本研究调查了评估页岩气井完整性的方法,采用层次分析法结合实验数据,建立评估标准和权重。评估专门针对长宁区块的页岩气井。结果表明,这些页岩气井的完整性受到钻井和压裂工艺等多种因素的影响。此外,油层套管/技术套管、携液能力、管柱变形等指标的完整性评价相对较低,表明需要加强监测和管理。综合评价结果表明,总体而言,页岩气井的完整性评价总体上属于 "一般",但仍存在一些安全隐患,需要及时关注和解决。案例分析揭示了页岩气井不同程度的完整性风险。案例 1 的评分为 93.51 分,需要引起注意,但仍被视为总体安全。然而,案例 2 的得分为 73.89,表明已达到灾难级别,需要紧急干预。压力、固井质量和腐蚀等关键因素需要积极管理,以实现安全、可持续的运营。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is an international open access journal that publishes original and review articles as well as book reviews on leading edge studies in the field of petroleum engineering, petroleum geology and exploration geophysics and the implementation of related technologies to the development and management of oil and gas reservoirs from their discovery through their entire production cycle. Focusing on: Reservoir characterization and modeling Unconventional oil and gas reservoirs Geophysics: Acquisition and near surface Geophysics Modeling and Imaging Geophysics: Interpretation Geophysics: Processing Production Engineering Formation Evaluation Reservoir Management Petroleum Geology Enhanced Recovery Geomechanics Drilling Completions The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice as detailed here: https://www.springer.com/us/editorial-policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信