Real-world efficacy and safety of BRAF-targeted therapy for patients with advanced melanoma: A single-center retrospective study in Japan

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Eiji Nakano, Akira Takahashi, Dai Ogata, Kenjiro Namikawa, Naoya Yamazaki
{"title":"Real-world efficacy and safety of BRAF-targeted therapy for patients with advanced melanoma: A single-center retrospective study in Japan","authors":"Eiji Nakano,&nbsp;Akira Takahashi,&nbsp;Dai Ogata,&nbsp;Kenjiro Namikawa,&nbsp;Naoya Yamazaki","doi":"10.1111/1346-8138.17263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most clinical trials investigating targeted therapies for patients harboring <i>BRAF</i> V600 mutations have included mostly White patients, and data for Asian patients are scarce. Although there are several retrospective studies in Japanese patients, they have investigated only the dabrafenib + trametinib regimen, and have had a short follow-up period. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to update previous studies and compare the outcomes with those in White patients. We analyzed 89 patients who received dabrafenib + trametinib or encorafenib + binimetinib, including 11 who received both treatment regimens. The overall response rate was 79.8%, with complete response in 25 patients (28.1%) and partial response in 45 patients (51.7%). The median progression-free survival was 13.7 months, and the median overall survival was 32.9 months. The 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 31.8% and 47.9%, respectively. Although the two regimens showed no significant differences in efficacy, their safety profiles differed, as reported in clinical trials. Therefore, the most frequent adverse event associated with the dabrafenib + trametinib regimen was pyrexia (61.3%) and that of encorafenib + binimetinib was blurred vision (32.0%). Switching directly to another targeted therapy after progressive disease showed no clinical response; however, rechallenge followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy showed a certain response. As a prognostic factor, performance status was associated with progression-free survival, and performance status, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, and dose interruption were associated with overall survival in the multivariate analysis. Real-world data on targeted therapy for patients with melanoma in Japan suggest that both dabrafenib + trametinib and encorafenib + binimetinib show similar efficacy and safety in Asian and White patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology","volume":"51 9","pages":"1199-1207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1346-8138.17263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most clinical trials investigating targeted therapies for patients harboring BRAF V600 mutations have included mostly White patients, and data for Asian patients are scarce. Although there are several retrospective studies in Japanese patients, they have investigated only the dabrafenib + trametinib regimen, and have had a short follow-up period. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to update previous studies and compare the outcomes with those in White patients. We analyzed 89 patients who received dabrafenib + trametinib or encorafenib + binimetinib, including 11 who received both treatment regimens. The overall response rate was 79.8%, with complete response in 25 patients (28.1%) and partial response in 45 patients (51.7%). The median progression-free survival was 13.7 months, and the median overall survival was 32.9 months. The 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 31.8% and 47.9%, respectively. Although the two regimens showed no significant differences in efficacy, their safety profiles differed, as reported in clinical trials. Therefore, the most frequent adverse event associated with the dabrafenib + trametinib regimen was pyrexia (61.3%) and that of encorafenib + binimetinib was blurred vision (32.0%). Switching directly to another targeted therapy after progressive disease showed no clinical response; however, rechallenge followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy showed a certain response. As a prognostic factor, performance status was associated with progression-free survival, and performance status, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, and dose interruption were associated with overall survival in the multivariate analysis. Real-world data on targeted therapy for patients with melanoma in Japan suggest that both dabrafenib + trametinib and encorafenib + binimetinib show similar efficacy and safety in Asian and White patients.

针对晚期黑色素瘤患者的 BRAF 靶向疗法的实际疗效和安全性:日本单中心回顾性研究。
大多数针对 BRAF V600 突变患者的靶向疗法临床试验主要包括白人患者,而亚洲患者的数据很少。虽然有几项针对日本患者的回顾性研究,但这些研究只调查了达拉非尼+曲美替尼方案,而且随访时间较短。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,以更新之前的研究,并将其结果与白人患者的结果进行比较。我们分析了89名接受达拉非尼+曲美替尼或安戈非尼+替米替尼治疗的患者,其中包括11名同时接受两种治疗方案的患者。总体应答率为79.8%,其中25例患者(28.1%)完全应答,45例患者(51.7%)部分应答。无进展生存期中位数为13.7个月,总生存期中位数为32.9个月。3年无进展生存率和总生存率分别为31.8%和47.9%。尽管这两种治疗方案在疗效上没有明显差异,但正如临床试验报告的那样,它们的安全性却有所不同。因此,达拉非尼+曲美替尼方案最常见的不良反应是热病(61.3%),而安戈非尼+比尼美替尼方案最常见的不良反应是视力模糊(32.0%)。疾病进展后直接换用另一种靶向治疗没有临床反应;但重新挑战后再用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗有一定反应。作为预后因素,表现状态与无进展生存期相关,而在多变量分析中,表现状态、血清乳酸脱氢酶水平和剂量中断与总生存期相关。日本黑色素瘤患者靶向治疗的实际数据表明,达拉非尼+曲美替尼和安戈非尼+替尼美替尼对亚裔和白人患者具有相似的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dermatology
Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
368
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatology is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Japanese Dermatological Association and the Asian Dermatological Association. The journal aims to provide a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in dermatology and to promote the discipline of dermatology in Japan and throughout the world. Research articles are supplemented by reviews, theoretical articles, special features, commentaries, book reviews and proceedings of workshops and conferences. Preliminary or short reports and letters to the editor of two printed pages or less will be published as soon as possible. Papers in all fields of dermatology will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信