Comparison of Proparacaine, Tetracaine, and Oxybuprocaine in Corneal Sensitivity Measurement.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Paula Basso Dias, Marta Dos Anjos Rodrigues Parchen, Daniel Wasilewski
{"title":"Comparison of Proparacaine, Tetracaine, and Oxybuprocaine in Corneal Sensitivity Measurement.","authors":"Paula Basso Dias, Marta Dos Anjos Rodrigues Parchen, Daniel Wasilewski","doi":"10.1089/jop.2023.0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aimed to determine the onset and duration of action of 3 commercially available topical anesthetic solutions in Brazil, using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau<sup>®</sup>, Paris, France) and to quantitatively assess patient-reported discomfort during application. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A prospective, randomized, masked, and double-blind study was conducted, involving 40 eyes from 21 patients. Patients were administered each one of the topical anesthetics weekly, and corneal sensitivity was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer's corneal touch threshold (CTT). Patients rated the burning sensation using a visual analogue scale (VAS). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 21 patients (42.9% male), with a mean age of 31.95 years (±standard deviation = 10.17, range = 22.0-58.0), corneal sensitivity significantly decreased 30 s after application, returning to baseline after 30 min for all groups (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Significant differences in CTT were observed at 5 min, with proparacaine exhibiting a superior anesthetic effect (<i>P</i> = 0.0003), at 10 min, where tetracaine displayed the most substantial anesthetic effect (<i>P</i> = 0.0135), and at 20 min, where tetracaine demonstrated the highest anesthetic efficacy (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). VAS scores indicated the most intense burning sensation with tetracaine (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Men reported experiencing more discomfort during instillation compared with women (<i>P</i> = 0.0168). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Proparacaine exhibited the fastest onset of action among the 3 topical anesthetics and provided a more comfortable eye sensation during instillation. However, tetracaine demonstrated the longest duration of action despite causing more discomfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":16689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"215-221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2023.0148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the onset and duration of action of 3 commercially available topical anesthetic solutions in Brazil, using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (Luneau®, Paris, France) and to quantitatively assess patient-reported discomfort during application. Methods: A prospective, randomized, masked, and double-blind study was conducted, involving 40 eyes from 21 patients. Patients were administered each one of the topical anesthetics weekly, and corneal sensitivity was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer's corneal touch threshold (CTT). Patients rated the burning sensation using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: Among the 21 patients (42.9% male), with a mean age of 31.95 years (±standard deviation = 10.17, range = 22.0-58.0), corneal sensitivity significantly decreased 30 s after application, returning to baseline after 30 min for all groups (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in CTT were observed at 5 min, with proparacaine exhibiting a superior anesthetic effect (P = 0.0003), at 10 min, where tetracaine displayed the most substantial anesthetic effect (P = 0.0135), and at 20 min, where tetracaine demonstrated the highest anesthetic efficacy (P < 0.0001). VAS scores indicated the most intense burning sensation with tetracaine (P < 0.0001). Men reported experiencing more discomfort during instillation compared with women (P = 0.0168). Conclusions: Proparacaine exhibited the fastest onset of action among the 3 topical anesthetics and provided a more comfortable eye sensation during instillation. However, tetracaine demonstrated the longest duration of action despite causing more discomfort.

比较 Proparacaine、Tetracaine 和 Oxybuprocaine 在角膜敏感度测量中的作用。
目的:本研究旨在使用 Cochet-Bonnet 血压计(Luneau®,法国巴黎)确定巴西市场上 3 种外用麻醉剂溶液的起效时间和作用持续时间,并定量评估患者报告的使用过程中的不适感。研究方法进行了一项前瞻性、随机、蒙面和双盲研究,涉及 21 名患者的 40 只眼睛。患者每周使用一种局部麻醉剂,并使用 Cochet-Bonnet 角膜触觉阈值(CTT)测量角膜敏感度。患者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对灼烧感进行评分。结果:在 21 名平均年龄为 31.95 岁(± 标准差 = 10.17,范围 = 22.0-58.0)的患者(42.9% 为男性)中,角膜敏感度在用药 30 秒后显著下降,30 分钟后所有组别均恢复至基线(P P = 0.0003),10 分钟时四卡因的麻醉效果最好(P = 0.0135),20 分钟时四卡因的麻醉效果最好(P P = 0.0168)。结论在三种局部麻醉剂中,丙美卡因起效最快,而且在灌注过程中眼睛感觉更舒适。不过,尽管四卡因会引起更多不适,但其作用持续时间却最长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal that combines the fields of ophthalmology and pharmacology to enable optimal treatment and prevention of ocular diseases and disorders. The Journal delivers the latest discoveries in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutics for the treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics coverage includes: Glaucoma Cataracts Retinal degeneration Ocular infection, trauma, and toxicology Ocular drug delivery and biotransformation Ocular pharmacotherapy/clinical trials Ocular inflammatory and immune disorders Gene and cell-based therapies Ocular metabolic disorders Ocular ischemia and blood flow Proliferative disorders of the eye Eyes on Drug Discovery - written by Gary D. Novack, PhD, featuring the latest updates on drug and device pipeline developments as well as policy/regulatory changes by the FDA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信