Determining the Optimal Length of Clinical Education Experiences: Surveying Doctor of Physical Therapy Academic and Clinical Faculty.

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000342
Mitch Wolden, Cindy Flom-Meland, Lori N Gusman, Elsa Drevyn, Christine McCallum
{"title":"Determining the Optimal Length of Clinical Education Experiences: Surveying Doctor of Physical Therapy Academic and Clinical Faculty.","authors":"Mitch Wolden, Cindy Flom-Meland, Lori N Gusman, Elsa Drevyn, Christine McCallum","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/review of literature: </strong>There is wide variability in the length of full-time clinical education experiences (CEEs) among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs. We investigated academic and clinical faculty perspectives on the optimal length and level of agreement on the length, timing, and offering of full-time CEEs.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A survey assessing perspectives on the optimal length and level of agreement for the length, timing, and offering of full-time CEEs was completed by 100 academic and 240 clinical faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Differences between academic and clinical faculty responses on the optimal length and level of agreement were assessed with a 2-sample test of proportions and 2-sample t -test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants believed that the length of full-time CEEs (in weeks) should be single CEE 10.6 (SD 2.3); first CEE 7.8 (SD 2.1); terminal CEE 12.5 (SD 5.4); integrated CEE 9.6 (SD 1.9); and total CEEs 37.2 (SD 6.9). There were significant differences (MD = -3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.6 to -1.6) between academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the total length of CEEs. No significant differences between academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the length of single, first, terminal, or integrated CEEs. There were significant differences between academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the optimal length of inpatient (MD = 1.1; 95% CI 0.6-1.6) and specialty (MD = 0.8; 95% CI 0.2-1.3) settings. There were significant differences between academic and clinical faculty level of agreement for 8 of 15 items.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>There was consistency between academic and clinical faculty regarding the perceived optimal length of full-time CEEs. Academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the optimal length of terminal full-time CEEs (12.5 weeks) were different than those for the national average (21.8 weeks) length of terminal full-time CEEs. Our study provides evidence to support DPT programs' clinical education curriculum decisions regarding the length of full-time CEEs to optimize students learning and maturation.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":"239-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/review of literature: There is wide variability in the length of full-time clinical education experiences (CEEs) among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs. We investigated academic and clinical faculty perspectives on the optimal length and level of agreement on the length, timing, and offering of full-time CEEs.

Subjects: A survey assessing perspectives on the optimal length and level of agreement for the length, timing, and offering of full-time CEEs was completed by 100 academic and 240 clinical faculty.

Methods: Differences between academic and clinical faculty responses on the optimal length and level of agreement were assessed with a 2-sample test of proportions and 2-sample t -test.

Results: Participants believed that the length of full-time CEEs (in weeks) should be single CEE 10.6 (SD 2.3); first CEE 7.8 (SD 2.1); terminal CEE 12.5 (SD 5.4); integrated CEE 9.6 (SD 1.9); and total CEEs 37.2 (SD 6.9). There were significant differences (MD = -3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.6 to -1.6) between academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the total length of CEEs. No significant differences between academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the length of single, first, terminal, or integrated CEEs. There were significant differences between academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the optimal length of inpatient (MD = 1.1; 95% CI 0.6-1.6) and specialty (MD = 0.8; 95% CI 0.2-1.3) settings. There were significant differences between academic and clinical faculty level of agreement for 8 of 15 items.

Discussion and conclusion: There was consistency between academic and clinical faculty regarding the perceived optimal length of full-time CEEs. Academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the optimal length of terminal full-time CEEs (12.5 weeks) were different than those for the national average (21.8 weeks) length of terminal full-time CEEs. Our study provides evidence to support DPT programs' clinical education curriculum decisions regarding the length of full-time CEEs to optimize students learning and maturation.

确定临床教育经历的最佳长度:调查物理治疗博士的学术和临床教师。
导言/文献综述:物理治疗博士(DPT)课程中全日制临床教育经历(CEE)的长度存在很大差异。我们调查了学术和临床教师对全日制 CEEs 最佳长度的看法以及在长度、时间和提供方面的一致程度:100名学术教师和240名临床教师完成了一项调查,评估了他们对全日制继续教育课程的最佳长度以及在长度、时间和开设方面的一致程度的看法:方法:采用 2 样本比例检验和 2 样本 t 检验,评估学术教师和临床教师对最佳时长和协议水平的回答之间的差异:参与者认为,全日制继续教育课程的长度(以周为单位)应为单次继续教育课程 10.6 周(标准差 2.3 周);首次继续教育课程 7.8 周(标准差 2.1 周);结业继续教育课程 12.5 周(标准差 5.4 周);综合继续教育课程 9.6 周(标准差 1.9 周);总继续教育课程 37.2 周(标准差 6.9 周)。学术教师和临床教师对 CEE 总时长的看法存在明显差异(MD = -3.0;95% 置信区间 [CI] -4.6~-1.6)。在单次、首次、终结性或综合 CEE 的时间长度方面,学术教师和临床教师的观点无明显差异。对于住院(MD = 1.1;95% CI 0.6-1.6)和专科(MD = 0.8;95% CI 0.2-1.3)的最佳时长,学术界和临床教师的观点存在明显差异。在 15 个项目中,学术教师和临床教师对其中 8 个项目的同意程度存在明显差异:学术教师和临床教师对全职继续教育最佳时间的看法是一致的。学术教师和临床教师对终结性全日制继续教育课程最佳长度(12.5 周)的看法不同于对全国终结性全日制继续教育课程平均长度(21.8 周)的看法。我们的研究为支持 DPT 项目的临床教育课程决策提供了证据,这些决策涉及全日制 CEE 的长度,以优化学生的学习和成熟度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信