Aufarbeitung der Corona-Pandemiemaßnahmen - Evidenzbasierte Risikokommunikation muss ein zentrales Thema sein

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ingrid Mühlhauser , Johannes Pantel , Gabriele Meyer
{"title":"Aufarbeitung der Corona-Pandemiemaßnahmen - Evidenzbasierte Risikokommunikation muss ein zentrales Thema sein","authors":"Ingrid Mühlhauser ,&nbsp;Johannes Pantel ,&nbsp;Gabriele Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evidence-based and comprehensible health information is a key element of evidence-based medicine and public health. The goal is informed decision-making based on realistic estimations of health risks and accurate expectations about benefits and harms of interventions. In Germany, standards of evidence-based risk information were poorly followed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frequently, public information was biased, fragmentary and misleading. Pandemic-related threat scenarios induced emotional distress and unnecessary anxiety. A systematic and comprehensive evaluation of the pandemic measures is crucial, but still pending in Germany. A critical analysis of risk communication by experts, politicians and the media during the pandemic should be a key element of the evaluation process. Evaluation of decision making and media reporting during the pandemic should improve preparedness for future crises.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"186 ","pages":"Pages 35-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000527/pdfft?md5=cf5d5d6ed253eab8d1d9ee8ad223ac3b&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000527-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence-based and comprehensible health information is a key element of evidence-based medicine and public health. The goal is informed decision-making based on realistic estimations of health risks and accurate expectations about benefits and harms of interventions. In Germany, standards of evidence-based risk information were poorly followed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frequently, public information was biased, fragmentary and misleading. Pandemic-related threat scenarios induced emotional distress and unnecessary anxiety. A systematic and comprehensive evaluation of the pandemic measures is crucial, but still pending in Germany. A critical analysis of risk communication by experts, politicians and the media during the pandemic should be a key element of the evaluation process. Evaluation of decision making and media reporting during the pandemic should improve preparedness for future crises.

[评估冠状病毒大流行期间采取的公共卫生措施:以证据为基础的风险交流必须成为中心议题]。
以证据为基础的、可理解的健康信息是循证医学和公共卫生的关键要素。其目标是根据对健康风险的现实估计和对干预措施利弊的准确预期做出知情决策。在德国,COVID-19 大流行期间,以证据为基础的风险信息标准没有得到很好的遵守。公共信息往往有失偏颇、支离破碎并具有误导性。与大流行病相关的威胁情景诱发了情绪困扰和不必要的焦虑。对大流行病措施进行系统全面的评估至关重要,但在德国仍有待进行。对专家、政治家和媒体在大流行病期间进行的风险交流进行批判性分析应成为评估过程的关键要素。对大流行病期间的决策和媒体报道进行评估应能改进对未来危机的准备工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信