[Implementation of an Open Door Policy on Two Acute Care Units].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1055/a-2296-0327
Lisa Katharina Schreiber, Florian Sattler, Andreas Jochen Fallgatter, Tilman Steinert, Florian Metzger
{"title":"[Implementation of an Open Door Policy on Two Acute Care Units].","authors":"Lisa Katharina Schreiber, Florian Sattler, Andreas Jochen Fallgatter, Tilman Steinert, Florian Metzger","doi":"10.1055/a-2296-0327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the amendments to the Baden-Württemberg Psychiatric Assistance Act, psychiatric patients who are treated involuntarily can be admitted to open wards. As a result, a comprehensive research project was carried out to implement an open-door policy. This work evaluates the attitudes of patients and therapeutic teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over the course of a year, 8 focus groups with 6 to 11 participants were conducted with patients and staff before and at the end of the intervention phase and analyzed qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concept of open doors was received positively. The staff raised safety concerns whereas on the patient side the door status seemed to be of limited relevance regarding the experience of autonomy or stigmatization.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The elaboration of conflict issues allows a further development of specific concepts towards the implementation of open doors on psychiatric acute wards.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":"300-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2296-0327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the amendments to the Baden-Württemberg Psychiatric Assistance Act, psychiatric patients who are treated involuntarily can be admitted to open wards. As a result, a comprehensive research project was carried out to implement an open-door policy. This work evaluates the attitudes of patients and therapeutic teams.

Methods: Over the course of a year, 8 focus groups with 6 to 11 participants were conducted with patients and staff before and at the end of the intervention phase and analyzed qualitatively.

Results: The concept of open doors was received positively. The staff raised safety concerns whereas on the patient side the door status seemed to be of limited relevance regarding the experience of autonomy or stigmatization.

Discussion: The elaboration of conflict issues allows a further development of specific concepts towards the implementation of open doors on psychiatric acute wards.

[在两家急症监护室实施开放政策]。
背景:自《巴登符腾堡州精神病援助法》修订后,非自愿接受治疗的精神病患者可以住进开放式病房。因此,巴登一符腾堡州开展了一项综合研究项目,以落实开放政策。这项工作对病人和治疗团队的态度进行了评估:方法:在一年的时间里,在干预阶段之前和结束时,对病人和员工进行了 8 次焦点小组讨论,每次有 6 到 11 人参加,并对结果进行了定性分析:结果:"敞开大门 "的概念得到了积极响应。工作人员提出了安全方面的问题,而在病人方面,门的状态似乎与自主体验或耻辱感关系不大:讨论:对冲突问题的阐述有助于进一步发展具体概念,以便在精神科急症病房实施开放式病房。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信