Comparing Rates of Radiographic Baseplate Loosening Between Cement and Cementless INFINITY Total Ankle Prostheses.

Ian Daniel Millstein, Manisha Koneru, John Epoh Dibato, Pietro Gentile, Adel Mahjoub, Erik Freeland
{"title":"Comparing Rates of Radiographic Baseplate Loosening Between Cement and Cementless INFINITY Total Ankle Prostheses.","authors":"Ian Daniel Millstein, Manisha Koneru, John Epoh Dibato, Pietro Gentile, Adel Mahjoub, Erik Freeland","doi":"10.1177/19386400241247456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total ankle replacement is indicated for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Periprosthetic radiolucency, from separation between the bone and implant, is suggested to be indicative of potential prosthesis failure risk. Anchoring implants with cement may mitigate this. This study aimed to compare rates of periprosthetic radiolucency between patients with cement-affixed and cementless implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 28 patients who underwent total ankle replacement with the INFINITY Total Ankle System (Wright Medical, Memphis, Tennessee) implant between January 2016 and May 2022. Anteroposterior, mortise, and lateral ankle X-rays were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers for tibiotalar angle, talar tilt, and periprosthetic radiolucency. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and chi-square test were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of periprosthetic radiolucency at the most recent follow-up did not significantly differ between cement and cementless groups (57.1% in both groups, P = 1.0). Follow-up tibiotalar and talar tilt angles were not significantly different (P > .51 for all comparisons).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with cemented implants had a similar incidence of periprosthetic radiolucency compared with patients with cementless prostheses. Understanding of long-term clinical outcomes will help inform optimal operative approaches for ankle prostheses.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, Level III, Retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400241247456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400241247456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Total ankle replacement is indicated for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Periprosthetic radiolucency, from separation between the bone and implant, is suggested to be indicative of potential prosthesis failure risk. Anchoring implants with cement may mitigate this. This study aimed to compare rates of periprosthetic radiolucency between patients with cement-affixed and cementless implants.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 28 patients who underwent total ankle replacement with the INFINITY Total Ankle System (Wright Medical, Memphis, Tennessee) implant between January 2016 and May 2022. Anteroposterior, mortise, and lateral ankle X-rays were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers for tibiotalar angle, talar tilt, and periprosthetic radiolucency. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and chi-square test were performed.

Results: The incidence of periprosthetic radiolucency at the most recent follow-up did not significantly differ between cement and cementless groups (57.1% in both groups, P = 1.0). Follow-up tibiotalar and talar tilt angles were not significantly different (P > .51 for all comparisons).

Conclusions: Patients with cemented implants had a similar incidence of periprosthetic radiolucency compared with patients with cementless prostheses. Understanding of long-term clinical outcomes will help inform optimal operative approaches for ankle prostheses.

Levels of evidence: Therapeutic, Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

比较有粘结和无粘结 INFINITY 全踝关节假体的底板松动率。
简介:全踝关节置换术适用于终末期踝关节骨性关节炎:全踝关节置换术适用于终末期踝关节骨关节炎。假体周围放射状粘连是由骨与假体之间的分离造成的,表明假体存在潜在的失效风险。用骨水泥锚定假体可降低这种风险。本研究旨在比较有骨水泥固定和无骨水泥固定植入物患者的假体周围放射性渗出率:对2016年1月至2022年5月期间接受INFINITY全踝关节系统(田纳西州孟菲斯市莱特医疗公司)植入物全踝关节置换术的28名患者进行了回顾性分析。由两名独立审查员对患者的胫距角、距骨倾斜度和假体周围放射性白斑进行前后位、臼位和踝关节侧位X光片审查。进行了 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和卡方检验:结果:在最近的随访中,骨水泥组和无骨水泥组的假体周围放射性白斑发生率无明显差异(两组均为57.1%,P = 1.0)。随访的胫骨和距骨倾斜角度无明显差异(所有比较中P > .51):结论:与使用无骨水泥假体的患者相比,使用骨水泥假体的患者发生假体周围放射性白斑的几率相似。对长期临床结果的了解将有助于为踝关节假体的最佳手术方法提供依据:治疗,III级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信