Brief discussion of the differences in the acupoint location between Meridians and Acupoints and Acupuncture and Moxibustion.

Q3 Medicine
Xin-Ling Li, Jun Zhou, Xin-Yue Zhang, Shi-Rui Cheng, Fang Zeng, Fan-Rong Liang, Zheng-Jie Li
{"title":"Brief discussion of the differences in the acupoint location between <i>Meridians and Acupoints</i> and <i>Acupuncture and Moxibustion</i>.","authors":"Xin-Ling Li, Jun Zhou, Xin-Yue Zhang, Shi-Rui Cheng, Fang Zeng, Fan-Rong Liang, Zheng-Jie Li","doi":"10.13702/j.1000-0607.20221412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are the differences in the location of some acupoints between textbooks <i>Meridians and Acupoints</i> and <i>Acupuncture and Moxibustion</i>. Both of the textbooks are in the category of the \"14<sup>th</sup> Five-Year Plan\". The differences in acupoint location have brought some confusion for students, full-time teachers and researchers in the field of traditional Chinese medicine. In the paper, based on GB/T 12346-2021: <i>Nomenclature and Location of Meridian Points</i>, published in2021, and in reference with GB/T 12346-2006: <i>Nomenclature and Location of Acupuncture Points,</i> published in 2006, the discrepancy in the acupoint location was systematically collated in the aspects of the expression style and layout, text expression and potential difference of location between these two textbooks, published by China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine, People's Medical Publishing House and China Science Publishing. Based on the historical evolution and the academic controversy of acupoint positioning, the reasons of the differences in acupoint location were analyzed, the potential influences on the teaching, examination, competition and research of Chinese medicine acupuncture were explored, and the suggestions for solution were proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":34919,"journal":{"name":"针刺研究","volume":"49 4","pages":"434-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"针刺研究","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13702/j.1000-0607.20221412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are the differences in the location of some acupoints between textbooks Meridians and Acupoints and Acupuncture and Moxibustion. Both of the textbooks are in the category of the "14th Five-Year Plan". The differences in acupoint location have brought some confusion for students, full-time teachers and researchers in the field of traditional Chinese medicine. In the paper, based on GB/T 12346-2021: Nomenclature and Location of Meridian Points, published in2021, and in reference with GB/T 12346-2006: Nomenclature and Location of Acupuncture Points, published in 2006, the discrepancy in the acupoint location was systematically collated in the aspects of the expression style and layout, text expression and potential difference of location between these two textbooks, published by China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine, People's Medical Publishing House and China Science Publishing. Based on the historical evolution and the academic controversy of acupoint positioning, the reasons of the differences in acupoint location were analyzed, the potential influences on the teaching, examination, competition and research of Chinese medicine acupuncture were explored, and the suggestions for solution were proposed.

简述经络与腧穴、针灸与灸法在腧穴位置上的区别。
经络腧穴》和《针灸大成》两本教科书在一些腧穴的位置上存在差异。这两本教材都属于 "十四五 "规划教材。腧穴位置的差异给中医学专业的学生、专职教师和研究人员带来了一些困惑。本文以2021年出版的GB/T 12346-2021《经络腧穴命名与定位》为基础,参照2006年出版的GB/T 12346-2006《腧穴命名与定位》,从表述体例与布局、文字表述、潜在定位差异等方面系统整理了中国中医药出版社、人民卫生出版社、中国科学出版社出版的两本教材在腧穴定位方面的差异。根据腧穴定位的历史演变和学术争鸣,分析了腧穴定位差异的原因,探讨了对中医针灸教学、考试、竞赛和研究的潜在影响,并提出了解决建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
针刺研究
针刺研究 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acupuncture Research was founded in 1976. It is an acupuncture academic journal supervised by the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, co-sponsored by the Institute of Acupuncture of the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences and the Chinese Acupuncture Association. This journal is characterized by "basic experimental research as the main focus, taking into account clinical research and reporting". It is the only journal in my country that focuses on reporting the mechanism of action of acupuncture. The journal has been changed to a monthly journal since 2018, published on the 25th of each month, and printed in full color. The manuscript acceptance rate is about 10%, and provincial and above funded projects account for about 80% of the total published papers, reflecting the latest scientific research results in the acupuncture field and has a high academic level. Main columns: mechanism discussion, clinical research, acupuncture anesthesia, meridians and acupoints, theoretical discussion, ideas and methods, literature research, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信