A situational and stakeholder analysis of health technology assessment in Zimbabwe.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Blessing Dzingirai, Prudence Dambiko, Celia Matyanga, Pinky Manyau, Dexter Tagwireyi, Maarten J Postma, Nyashadzaishe Mafirakureva, Marinus van Hulst
{"title":"A situational and stakeholder analysis of health technology assessment in Zimbabwe.","authors":"Blessing Dzingirai, Prudence Dambiko, Celia Matyanga, Pinky Manyau, Dexter Tagwireyi, Maarten J Postma, Nyashadzaishe Mafirakureva, Marinus van Hulst","doi":"10.1017/S0266462324000266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Systematic priority setting is necessary for achieving high-quality healthcare using limited resources in low- and middle-income countries. Health technology assessment (HTA) is a tool that can be used for systematic priority setting. The objective of this study was to conduct a stakeholder and situational analysis of HTA in Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified and analyzed stakeholders using the International Decision Support Initiative checklist. The identified stakeholders were invited to an HTA workshop convened at the University of Zimbabwe. We used an existing HTA situational analysis questionnaire to ask for participants' views on the need, demand, and supply of HTA. A follow-up survey was done among representatives of stakeholder organizations that failed to attend the workshop. We reviewed two health policy documents relevant to the HTA. Qualitative data from the survey and document review were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight organizations were identified as stakeholders for HTA in Zimbabwe. A total of 41 respondents from these stakeholder organizations participated in the survey. Respondents highlighted that the HTA was needed for transparent decision making. The demand for HTA-related evidence was high except for the health economic and ethics dimensions, perhaps reflecting a lack of awareness. Ministry of Health was listed as a major supplier of HTA data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no formal HTA agency in the Zimbabwe healthcare system. Various institutions make decisions on prioritization, procurement, and coverage of health services. The activities undertaken by these organizations provide context for the institutionalization of HTA in Zimbabwe.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Systematic priority setting is necessary for achieving high-quality healthcare using limited resources in low- and middle-income countries. Health technology assessment (HTA) is a tool that can be used for systematic priority setting. The objective of this study was to conduct a stakeholder and situational analysis of HTA in Zimbabwe.

Methods: We identified and analyzed stakeholders using the International Decision Support Initiative checklist. The identified stakeholders were invited to an HTA workshop convened at the University of Zimbabwe. We used an existing HTA situational analysis questionnaire to ask for participants' views on the need, demand, and supply of HTA. A follow-up survey was done among representatives of stakeholder organizations that failed to attend the workshop. We reviewed two health policy documents relevant to the HTA. Qualitative data from the survey and document review were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Forty-eight organizations were identified as stakeholders for HTA in Zimbabwe. A total of 41 respondents from these stakeholder organizations participated in the survey. Respondents highlighted that the HTA was needed for transparent decision making. The demand for HTA-related evidence was high except for the health economic and ethics dimensions, perhaps reflecting a lack of awareness. Ministry of Health was listed as a major supplier of HTA data.

Conclusions: There is no formal HTA agency in the Zimbabwe healthcare system. Various institutions make decisions on prioritization, procurement, and coverage of health services. The activities undertaken by these organizations provide context for the institutionalization of HTA in Zimbabwe.

对津巴布韦卫生技术评估的形势和利益相关者分析。
目标:在低收入和中等收入国家,要利用有限的资源实现高质量的医疗保健,就必须系统地确定优先事项。卫生技术评估 (HTA) 是一种可用于系统性确定优先事项的工具。本研究的目的是对津巴布韦的 HTA 进行利益相关者和形势分析:方法:我们使用国际决策支持计划清单确定并分析了利益相关者。我们邀请已确定的利益相关者参加在津巴布韦大学召开的 HTA 研讨会。我们使用现有的 HTA 形势分析问卷,询问与会者对 HTA 需求、需求和供应的看法。我们还对未能参加研讨会的利益相关组织代表进行了后续调查。我们审查了两份与 HTA 相关的卫生政策文件。我们采用主题分析法对调查和文件审查中的定性数据进行了分析:结果:48 个组织被确定为津巴布韦 HTA 的利益相关者。来自这些利益相关组织的 41 名受访者参与了调查。受访者强调,透明的决策需要 HTA。对 HTA 相关证据的需求很高,但卫生经济和伦理方面的需求除外,这或许反映了人们缺乏这方面的意识。卫生部被列为 HTA 数据的主要提供者:津巴布韦医疗系统中没有正式的 HTA 机构。各种机构负责决定医疗服务的优先次序、采购和覆盖范围。这些机构开展的活动为津巴布韦的 HTA 制度化提供了背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信