Prevalence and factors associated with the perception of perineal laceration: a cross-sectional study with data from the Nascer no Brasil Survey, 2011 and 2012.

IF 2.5 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude Pub Date : 2024-04-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S2237-96222024V33E2023621.EN
Luciana Mamede, Daniele Marano, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Junior
{"title":"Prevalence and factors associated with the perception of perineal laceration: a cross-sectional study with data from the Nascer no Brasil Survey, 2011 and 2012.","authors":"Luciana Mamede, Daniele Marano, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Junior","doi":"10.1590/S2237-96222024V33E2023621.EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the prevalence of perineal laceration, based on the self-reported perception of postpartum women, and to analyze factors associated with its occurrence in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 23,894 postpartum women, excluding twin pregnancies, cesarean sections, and births with episiotomies, between 2011 and 2012. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of association between the event and maternal, fetus/newborn, obstetric and clinical management characteristics were estimated in hierarchical Poisson regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4,606 postpartum women, 49.5% (95%CI 46.1;42.9) self-reported perineal laceration. Being an adolescent (PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25), primipara (PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63), having had excessive gestational weight gain (PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29) and having undergone the Kristeller maneuver (PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29) increased the proportion of the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results found call for prenatal care and adjustments to childbirth care so as to be in accordance with current recommendations.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration was 49.5%. Being in the adolescent age group, primiparity, excessive gestational weight and the Kristeller maneuver were risk factors associated with the event.</p><p><strong>Implications for services: </strong>Studying self-reported prevalence of perineal laceration supports new care practices, highlights the prevention of risk factors considered modifiable and confirms the need to follow current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Perspectives: </strong>New national studies are needed comparing prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration with that recorded in medical records in order to support care practices and public obstetric policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51473,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","volume":"33 ","pages":"e2023621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222024V33E2023621.EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the prevalence of perineal laceration, based on the self-reported perception of postpartum women, and to analyze factors associated with its occurrence in Brazil.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 23,894 postpartum women, excluding twin pregnancies, cesarean sections, and births with episiotomies, between 2011 and 2012. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of association between the event and maternal, fetus/newborn, obstetric and clinical management characteristics were estimated in hierarchical Poisson regression models.

Results: Out of 4,606 postpartum women, 49.5% (95%CI 46.1;42.9) self-reported perineal laceration. Being an adolescent (PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25), primipara (PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63), having had excessive gestational weight gain (PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29) and having undergone the Kristeller maneuver (PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29) increased the proportion of the outcome.

Conclusion: The results found call for prenatal care and adjustments to childbirth care so as to be in accordance with current recommendations.

Main results: Prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration was 49.5%. Being in the adolescent age group, primiparity, excessive gestational weight and the Kristeller maneuver were risk factors associated with the event.

Implications for services: Studying self-reported prevalence of perineal laceration supports new care practices, highlights the prevention of risk factors considered modifiable and confirms the need to follow current guidelines.

Perspectives: New national studies are needed comparing prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration with that recorded in medical records in order to support care practices and public obstetric policies.

会阴裂伤的发生率及相关因素:利用 2011 年和 2012 年巴西 Nascer 调查数据进行的横断面研究。
目的根据产后妇女的自我报告,描述会阴裂伤的发生率,并分析巴西发生会阴裂伤的相关因素:这是一项横断面研究,在 2011 年至 2012 年间对 23894 名产后妇女进行了调查,其中不包括双胎妊娠、剖宫产和使用外阴切开术的分娩。在分层泊松回归模型中估算了事件与产妇、胎儿/新生儿、产科和临床管理特征之间的患病率(PR)和95%置信区间(95%CI):在 4 606 名产后妇女中,49.5%(95%CI 46.1;42.9)的妇女自述会阴裂伤。青少年(PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25)、初产妇(PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63)、妊娠体重增加过多(PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29)和接受过克里斯特勒手法(PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29)会增加出现这种结果的比例:主要结果:产前护理和分娩护理的调整应符合当前的建议:主要结果:自我报告的会阴裂伤发生率为 49.5%。青少年年龄组、初产妇、妊娠体重过大和克里斯特勒手法是与该事件相关的风险因素:对服务的启示:对会阴裂伤发生率的自我报告研究支持了新的护理实践,强调了预防被认为是可以改变的风险因素,并证实了遵循现行指南的必要性:需要开展新的全国性研究,比较自我报告的会阴裂伤发生率和医疗记录中记录的发生率,以支持护理实践和公共产科政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信